The worldwide shortage of water could become, perhaps, the most serious crisis facing the world in this century . For an overview on the water problem see
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?memberId=63486&articleId=281474977063082
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?memberId=63486&articleId=281474977063093
A serious food shortage in 2009 may bring more attention to this approaching crisis.
The world is heading for a drop in agricultural production of 20 to 40 percent, depending on the severity and length of the current global droughts. Food producing nations are imposing food export restrictions. Food prices will soar, and, in poor countries with food deficits, millions will starve.
To understand the depth of the food Catastrophe that faces the world this year, consider the graphic below depicting countries by USD value of their agricultural output, as of 2006.

Consider the same graphic with the countries experiencing droughts highlighted.
The countries that make up two thirds of the world's agricultural output are experiencing drought conditions.
http://tinyurl.com/dbr53p
Catastrophic Fall in 2009 Global Food Production
by Eric deCarbonnel
A lack of credit for farmers limited their ability to buy seeds and fertilizers in 2008/2009 and will limit production around the world. The effects of droughts worldwide will also be amplified by the smaller amount of seeds and fertilizers used to grow crops. The low prices at the end of 2008 discouraged the planting of new crops in 2009. In Kansas for example, farmers seeded nine million acres, the smallest planting for half a century. Wheat plantings this year are down about 4 million acres across the US and about 1.1 million acres in Canada. So even discounting drought related losses, the US, Canada, and other food producing nations are facing lower agricultural output in 2009. Europe, the only big agricultural region relatively unaffected by drought, is set for a big drop in food production. Due to the combination of a late plantings, poorer soil conditions, reduced inputs, and light rainfall, Europe's agricultural output is likely to fall by 10 to 15 percent.
The combined averaged of the ending stock levels of the major trading countries of Australia, Canada, United States, and the European Union have been declining steadily in the last few years:
2002-2005: 47.4 million tons
2007: 37.6 million tons
2008: 27.4 million tons
These inventory numbers are dangerously low, especially considering the possibility that China's reported 60 million tons of grain reserves may not actually exist.
The droughts plaguing the world's biggest agricultural regions should end the debate about deflation in 2009. The demand for agricultural commodities is relatively immune to developments in the business cycles (at least compared to that of energy or base metals), and, with a 20 to 40 percent decline in world production, already rising food prices are headed significantly higher.
The price of agricultural commodities needs to head higher to prevent even greater food shortages and famine. The price of wheat, corn, soybeans, etc must rise to a level which encourages the planting of every available acre with the best possible fertilizers. Otherwise, if food prices stay at their current levels, production will continue to fall, sentencing millions more to starvation.
Instead of "competitive currency devaluations", spiking food prices will likely cause competitive currency appreciation in 2009. Foreign exchange reserves exist for just this type of emergency . Central banks around the world will lower domestic food prices by either directly selling off their reserves to appreciate their currencies or by using them to purchase grain on the world market.
Appreciating a currency is the fastest way to control food inflation. A more valuable currency allows a nation to monopolize more global resources (ie: the overvalued dollar allows the US to consume 25% of the world's oil despite having only 4% of the world's population). If China were to selloff its US reserves, its enormous population would start sucking up the world's food supply like the US has been doing with oil.
When a nation appreciates its currency and starts consuming more of the world's resources, it leaves less for everyone else. So when China appreciates its currency, food shortages worldwide will increase and prices everywhere else will increase. As there is nothing that breeds social unrest like soaring food prices, nations around the world, from Russia, to the EU, to Saudi Arabia, to India, will sell off their foreign reserves to appreciate their currencies and reduce the cost of food imports. In response to this, China will sell even more of its reserves and so on. That is competitive currency appreciation.
With competitive currency appreciation, the world's reserve currency, the dollar, is likely to do very poorly as the central banks liquidate trillions in US holdings to buy food and strengthen their currencies.
Peak water
Lester Brown has written a comprehensive article, "The Geopolitics of Food Scarcity" describing the relation of failed states to population growth and water shortage. http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,druck-606937,00.html
Lester R. Brown is president of the Washington, D.C.-based Earth Policy Institute and author of "Plan B 3.0: Mobilizing to Save Civilization."
He says, "The progressive worldwide depletion of aquifers is making further expansion of food production more difficult. After nearly tripling from 94 million hectares in 1950 to 276 million hectares in 2000, the world's irrigated area abruptly stopped growing. For the world's farmers, peak water apparently has arrived....Of all the environmental trends that are shrinking the world's food supplies, the most immediate is water shortages. In a world where 70 percent of all water use is for irrigation, this is no small matter. The drilling of millions of irrigation wells has pushed water withdrawal in many countries beyond recharge rates from rainfall, leading to groundwater mining. As a result, water tables are now falling in countries that contain half the world's people, including the big three grain producers -- China, India, and the United States.
Aquifer depletion poses a particularly serious threat to China and India where between roughly 80 and 60 percent, respectively, of the grain harvest comes from irrigated land. This compares with only 20 percent in the United States. Most aquifers can be replenished. When they are depleted, the pumping is necessarily reduced to the rate of recharge. Fossil aquifers, however, are not replenishable: For these, depletion brings pumping to an end. Farmers who lose their irrigation water can return to lower-yield dryland farming if rainfall permits, but in more arid regions, such as the southwestern United States or the Middle East, it can mean the end of agriculture altogether.
Nowhere is the shrinkage of irrigated agriculture more dramatic than in Saudi Arabia, a country as water-poor as it is oil-rich. After the Arab oil export embargo in the 1970s, the Saudis realized they were vulnerable to a counter embargo on grain. To become self-sufficient in wheat, they developed a heavily subsidized irrigated agriculture based on pumping water from a fossil aquifer over a half-mile below the surface. In early 2008, with the aquifer largely deplet-ed, the Saudis announced that they will phase out wheat production by 2016 -- after being self-sufficient in this staple food for over 20 years. Saudi Arabia will then be importing roughly 14 million metric tons of wheat, rice, corn, and barley for its Canada-sized population of 30 million people. It is the first country to publicly reveal how aquifer depletion will shrink its grain harvest.
Falling water tables are also adversely affecting harvests in many other countries. In China, a groundwater survey revealed that the water table under the North China Plain, an area that produces over half of the country's wheat and a third of its corn, is falling fast. Overpumping has largely depleted the shallow aquifer, forcing well drillers to turn to the region's deep aquifer, which is not replenishable. The aquifer is dropping at a rate of nearly three meters per year. A 2001 World Bank report predicted "catastrophic consequences for future generations" unless water use and supply can quickly be brought back into balance.
As water tables fall and irrigation wells go dry, China's wheat crop, the world's largest, is shrinking. After peaking at 111 million metric tons in 1997, the harvest fell to 103 million metric tons this year, a drop of seven percent within a decade. During the same period, production of rice, a water-guzzling crop, dropped six percent from 127 million to 119 million tons. Already dependent on imports for nearly 70 percent of its soybeans, China may soon be importing massive quantities of grain as well.
In India the margin between food consumption and survival is even more precarious. The country's farmers have drilled 21 million irrigation wells, with the result that water tables are falling in almost every state. In a survey of India's water situation, British author and journalist Fred Pearce reported in August 2004 in New Scientist magazine that "half of India's traditional hand-dug wells and millions of shallower tube wells have already dried up, bringing a spate of suicides among those who rely on them. Electricity blackouts are reaching epidemic proportions in states where half of the electricity is used to pump water from depths of up to a kilometer."


Comments: 11
The water problem is caused by a multiple set of conditions: Increases in population, industrial and agricultural use, and climate change. Major aquifers, like the Ogallalla that underlies much of the Great Plains, are being drawn down much faster than they can be replenished by rainfall. The result will be desertification of one of the most productive agricultural areas in the world. With world population at 6.5 billion and climbing, it is only a matter of time before major crop failures cause a worldwide famine causing mass starvation. This is bound to lead to military conflicts, possibly even nuclear war.
Yes I am kidding. Yes, it actually is as bad as you say it is. 10 for you.
Yes, the depletion of water is the result of population growth and wrong government policies. I added above a link to Lester Brown's study in which he writes, "The progressive worldwide depletion of aquifers is making further expansion of food production more difficult. After nearly tripling from 94 million hectares in 1950 to 276 million hectares in 2000, the world's irrigated area abruptly stopped growing. For the world's farmers, peak water apparently has arrived."
The global economic crisis has resulted fundamentally because the US took on far too much debt, both public and private, and invented far too exotic and risky forms of debt, creating a massive credit excess "house of cards" that is now collapsing. The liberal capitalist, US-dominated global financial and economic order is giving way to statism in the West,and the dissimilarity between the Russian, Chinese and other statist political and economic ideologies is vanishing.East-West competition is growing on a fundamental level for control of the globe's finite strategic resources and access to, and control over the world's finite capital wealth. These two factors constitute the life-blood of the industrialized economy of any nation, or any grouping of nations. The transfer of wealth from the West to the East enables the East to use its currency reserves to increasingly control international trade and the US ecomony and foreign policy.
I am not sure what you mean by "sustainable production" in reference to the strength of a currency. It usually refers to a specific program for economic development. For example, "10 Principles of Sustainable Production:
Products and packaging are designed to be safe and ecologically sound throughout their life cycle.
Services are organized to satisfy real human needs and promote equity and fairness.
Wastes and ecologically incompatible byproducts are reduced, eliminated or recycled
Chemical substances or physical agents and conditions that present hazards to human health or the environment are eliminated.
Energy and materials are conserved, and the forms of energy and materials used are most appropriate for the desired ends.
Work places and technologies are designed to minimize or eliminate chemical, ergonomic and physical hazards.
Work is organized to conserve and enhance the efficiency and creativity of employees.
The security and well-being of all employees is a priority, as is the continuous development of their talents and capacities.
The communities around workplaces are respected and enhanced economically, socially, culturally and physically.
The long-term economic viability of the enterprise or institution is enhanced.
One of the main causes of the depletion of commonly-shared resources is an unfortunate characteristic of human nature. I wrote an article about this last year called The Tragedy of the Commons.
The US can sell its bonds to China and others because the dollar is still a safe haven, but eventually others will seek ways to diversify more of their reserves , because the dollar's value will decrease. The current global meltdown continues and for the US the standard of living will continue to decrease until it gets its domestic economy in order. The 50 states cannot print money like the Treasury but must depend on their revenues and selling bonds. Rebuilding the economy will take time.
I think every nation needs to develop sustainable production. Many have been but the US has not been enough. The oil addiction, for example, has been maintained by the government/business estblishment. Generally, the government invested 7% per annum in infrastructure, but for many years it has been only 4%. The military has been taking 54% of the budget, but this may in real terms as much as 80%.
The current spending bill is mostly directed to "status quo" projects. That won't be enough. And the banks will have to be bailed out for several trillion more it seems.
The reason our health care ranks about 34th among nations is because the obscene profits special interests are getting is hidden by the government legislation they bought and wrote.