The demonization of Iran in the West, especially in the United States, has been evident in the media, notably in the repetition of false versions of it's president's rhetoric, ignoring the content of what he says. Officially, Iran's foreign policy is not to attack anyone. Also, it supports the universal reduction of nuclear weapons .
Ahmadinejad's rhetoric against the "regime" in Israel has been represented as a threat to attack Israel, "to wipe it off map." This is not what he said. He has made clear he has no hatred for the Israeli people or Jews.
His rhetoric does not resonate well with a majority of Iranians, who have severely criticized him for it. Iran, before the 1979 Islamic Revolution, had good relations with Israel. Iranian Jews are not restricted from visiting or emigrating to Israel and those Iranians who have emigrated to Israel can visit Iran.
This is the full transcript of the speech in farsi:
www.president.ir/farsi/ahmadinejad/speeches/1384/aban-84/840804sahyonizm.htm
In his speech, Ahmadinejad declares that Zionism is the West's partner in political oppression of Muslims. He says the "Zionist regime" was imposed on the Islamic world as a bridgehead to achieve domination of the region and its assets. Palestine, he says, is the frontline of the Islamic world's struggle with American hegemony, and its fate will have repercussions for the entire Middle East.
He does not say what sort of settlement the Palestinians should make with Israel. That is their choice. Iran has no right to tell them what to do and it will support any settlement that the Palestinians and Israel agree to.
Ahmadinejad admits that the removal of America's and the Zionists' power in the region may seem inconceivable to many , but, he reminds the audience that, as Ayatollah Khomeini predicted in in the early 1980s, other seemingly invincible empires have disappeared and now only exist in history books. He then lists three regimes that have collapsed or " vanished," within the last 30 years, as Ayatollah Khomeini predicted: The Shah of Iran- the U.S. installed monarch;the Soviet Union;Iran's chief enemy - Iraq's Saddam Hussein
In the first and third cases , Ahmadinejad indicates he is quoting Khomeini's own words ("The Imam said..") foretelling that individual regime's demise.
He concludes by referring to Khomeini's unfulfilled wish. The "Imam" is Khomeini ( 1902-1989):
"The Imam said this regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time. This statement is very wise".
This is the passage that has been widely mistranslated and taken out of context, generally as "Israel should be wiped off the map.". He doesn't say "Israel" . He speaks of the "regime in Jerusalem." Khomeini called for "regime change."
Iran offered to recognize Israel in 2003 in an official letter to the United States, as a pre-concession (among other significant concessions) in return for open negotiations seeking ways to establish normal relations with the United States. The Bush administration did not respond. (As it did not respond to North Korea's repeated offers to continue negotiations that were in process since 2000.)
Iran had given valuable logistical support to the United States in the 2001 military invasion of Afghanistan, including Iranians working with US generals in Afghanistan. It had not interfered with the invasion of Iraq. Yet following the 2003 Iranian offer, Bush made his "axis of evil" speech , calling Iran a terrorist state. This hostility to Iran and its refusal to negotiate without first agreeing to abandon its ongoing nuclear development resulted in the loss of power in the 2005 elections by the reformers to the hardliners in Iran.
However, Ahmadinejad's extreme rhetoric has produced a reaction in Iran and more recently brought a rebuke from the more pragmatic leaders, including Ayatollah Khamenei, the supreme leader, who has the leading political authority in Iran, over that of the president, and determines its foreign policy.


Comments: 17
Talk is easy and less expensive than warfare.
The fact is, that we will never have peace until we learn to listen.
Miller's Law (from psychologist George Miller): "In order to understand what another person is saying, you must assume that it is true, and try to imagine what it could be true OF."
When Bush declared in 2003 that "American's can know that they [the Bush administration] did everything possible to avoid going to war" -- it turns out that a more urate statement would have been that the administration did everything possible to not only ensure that the war happened, but also to try and make the public embrace the idea of going to war.
The same thing is happening now. The White House is secretly writing a script that will lead to war with Iran, and they are once again -- as they did in 2002 and early 2003 with the Iraq war -- enlisting the media to help them sell the war to the public. Rest assured we will not hear from the mainstream corporate media anything that puts Iran in a light different from what the White House wants us to believe: that Iran is actively developing nuclear weapons, and that they intend to use those weapons to wipe out Israel and then us.
Is Israel a "democracy"? No. Citizens have different rights.
Has it a Constitution? No, because that would require its legal system to deal with matters relating to restrictions of the rights of different groups. Even different Jewish groups have certain right denied.
Is it in violation of many UN resolutions? Many.
Elections are held in many countries. The question for many is Israel a terrorist or rogue "regime"?
It is clear that the neo-con team is trying to create the conditions for war.
You are welcome to your opinion, but that doesn't make it true.
Hmm.
Now about Iran: it's been going around the lightworker networks for several years that the Pentagon has scheduled warmongering with Iran and Syria. They're just - you know, the usual - they're just diddling around with secret agents fomenting stuff here and there, working to get the right mix so the most profits go to certain corporatocrats...
I am so glad to hear that the folks in Iran are putting a hush to Ahmadinejad's rhetoric, just our own Congress is trying to tone down this admin. They say Ahmadinejad's cohorts aren't doing so well in their re-elctions, just as Republicans didn't do so well here in our elections.
It's all working out, balance is the key. Both sides have said things they never should have said, but the people of both nations are trying to straighten it out, because we are all tired of their rhetoric, and ready to bring peace.
However, now's the time to take these cold hard rogue-patriarch-warmonger facts and do something to the energy balance.
Like, add feminine energy to the mix.
There are a couple of primary ways of doing this. Rosa's post, above, demonstrates one of them. If you go back and sit in its energy, you may notice a huge love-power vibration emanating from it which directly affects the heart center, or heart chakra.
That's the "Feminine Addition" energy.
Another way of using Feminine power is to use the negative or "Take-Away" power of the downward vortex created during "moontime" or menses. Using that power, for women who are masters of it, could entail something like going into the dreamtime and "seeing" the negative energy zone created by our invasive threatening presence - and then commanding the vortex as you would a regular whirlwind [they can be commanded by adepts], to remove the negativity. That would take the wind out of certain warmongers' sails.
An alternative would be to meet, in spirit, with the Bee Goddess, and ask her to establish hives of "Spirit Bees" in that zone. Bees are transformers of negative energy.
All that is through my "filters," but each of us has his/her own access to personal power and to the dreamtime and the mental field of human consciousness.
It IS time to stop sitting back thinking there's nothing we can do do un-do these foolish cruel-hearted actions, and just get busy sending every possible amount of love to every "enemy", every time the thought of the Middle East comes up.
Time to stop magnifying the negative by focusing on it; and time to MAGNIFY THE POSITIVE POTENTIAL BY DEVOTING ENERGY TO IT.
You have expressed an opinion about the rights of citizens, the legal system etc., haven't you? I'm not interested, as I wrote, in making any further comment here than I already have. If we have a different understanding , fine. I'm leaving it there.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odGev-D3KKk
good one!!
sorry savages
Mitch: There are "facts" and then there seem to be "facts." Which ones do we believe -- the ones about WMD and mushroom clouds? I personally don't think I want to rely on the CIA World Factbook -- and, what in the hell is a "true" democracy? Anything like the democracy we're at risk of losing, while we're busy bringing democracy to the rest of the world?