OK folks, is it just me or does it seem like the average article gets less widely read then before the site "update"? I have written some good stuff and it has gotten 3 or 4 comment (one solid piece on a topical subject got a whopping one comment).. My network has grown in size. So either my recent articles really sucked or the new layout has had a negative impact on things. I am bummed, since I wrote these articles to invoke healthy discussion (OK, in one case I just wanted to brag about my hot love life). What gives?
Why bother? The points seem to accumulate slower, there are less readers, and the site management seems to ignore user requests. I am open to suggestions on blogging sites that get read.
This is not a tongue in cheek message. I am annoyed that the new update has resulted in a change to readership levels. Who is benefiting? Do I have to say something crazy in a title to evoke responses? I even changed the name of one article that I wanted to trigger a debate on the politics of health care to "Insurance Companies Killed My Wife" and no one came. Insurance Companies really did play a huge role in the death of my wife. This is a problem we need to discuss. Maybe if I had titled the article "Stephanie Brail Killed My Wife by Not Supporting Socialized Medicine" (aside to Steph, I know you probably support socialized medicine)? How about "Lance Bass Raises Insurance Costs with Gay Blood"? Maybe "Ratings Troll Refuses to Cover Preexisting Conditions During J5K's Absence"?
I wrote a sexy poem, my first real poem and bravely posted it to Gather. It is evocative. Some read it and commented. But I could use more feedbacl. I get feedback on the lovemaking the poem is about and I find it helpful to have a feedback cycle to always improve.
I spilled my heart about my own experience with metaphysical manifestation like those discussed recently by Aileen Fish and got a few responses from Aileen. It was a great article about how my manifestations began as a teenager. Where are the readers.
Someone please let me in on the secret to inciting a decent debate about serious issues on Gather without resorting to parlor tricks! If that can't be done, teach me parlor tricks! I want to go back to the Gather where taking time to write an article was worth it to get feedback from good people. Did Psycho Troops and Gozer Cause the Good People to Perish? What's the haps?
OK, maybe my articles suck. But before the update people read, commented, and wanted to connect. It seemed I was reaching people and building relationships and exchanging meaningful communications. Now I feel like it isn't worth my time anymore. To get your attention, I entitled this piece "Gather Update Makes Me Cry Like A Little Girl". That's a stretch, I think it was a very manly cry. But you get my drift.
Please, please, please tell me how to win friends and influence people without reading Dale Carnegie all over again! Yes, I know Lance Bass is gay, and AOL plays some bad songs, and John A. knows every's alter-ego? But did people know how the diagnosis code checked on their insurance claim could change their life? Did they know how a teenage boy's dream of driving an Mustang Convertible can come true?
OK. I am getting off the soap box now. I guess I will have to find more productive uses for my time. This Gather thing was fun but if a Gather article is posted into a void, will anyone comment?
About Gather |
Engagement Marketing |
Make New Friends |
Gather Points |
Advertise on Gather |
Gather Press |
Privacy |
Terms of Service |
Community Guidelines
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Version 16961, "Pacino"; Copyright © 2009 Gather Inc. All rights reserved.


Comments: 33
I have not heard back from Gather. I did email David Cooperstein as to what changed about the pionts sytem and he did reply to me in an email that he didn't think anything changed about the pionts system, and that he forwarded my comment to Ben Stephens.
I emailed Ben Stephens separately about the following point: I think the views are "unique views" resulting in a lot fewer points for everybody.
I have not heard back. I do think they (Gather) are overwhelmed, but I would like to know.
Points are slower. Unless people have not been accumulating points before now.
Maybe most people are reading from their network, I don't know. I am chronically underslept and behind in everything in my life.
Thanks for commenting. I know the chronically underslept feeling. I should be calling it a night now...
Let's just get back to where we were. We were all gett used to it.
I promise you, it was not the Gozers or masked men who caused this. I'm not sure who you consider the 'psycho troops', or I'd address that. I would like to point you to the serious writers (that's what I used to do), but hanging with them will only get you lots of 'one' ratings so you probably don't want to be 'seen' with the wrong crowd.
Of course, these are my personal opinions. Probably not worth much, so do with them what you want.
So we're back to where does a person seeking serious discussion on topical issues go to spur said discussion? I am clinging to hope that my investment of time into Gather has not been in vain.
Good night. It's 2am. Sleepy time. Thanks for the commentsa
as for points for good writing or content--forget it. fgather is into cliques and the more you suck up, the more you get.
Add in the fact that every page loads slower, over a cable modem connection, I logged on just as much but interacting much less.
For three days last week, every time I changed pages I got a pop-up asking if I wanted to load some Adobe flashplayer plugin. As far as I can tell, there is no content on gather that requires a flashplayer, just ads! Talk about annoying.
Maybe it's not your writing at all, maybe your articles are pushed down on the article list by other people posting. By the time I am done reading the first page of articles, it's time for me to do something else. Maybe some of your connections are not here anymore, so they are not reading.
Two, Sara said what I suspected. So much new content is pushing me too far down. I do like the accessibility of the new design to new articles.
Wihelmine, sorry to hear about your insurance hassle. I guess there is no perfect answer. I'd still like to search for a good answer.
and it is hard to find articles. i am so sick of these game articles, that people just put up silly stuff. it is ok for them, but i have to scroll through pages of articles 'for me' to find serious ones. and, i don't have the time or energy to read everything. sigh.
i liked your article on the insurance, rich. (and the comments!)
I also think the new formatting is less efficient. My "My Gather" is annoying and wastes valuable space. I really don't care who has signed-on. I can usually surmise as much from reading recent comments.
I've had difficulty disconnecting with people. I've tried purging my connections, and yet they remain in my queue just as before.
In addition, if you're connected to a lot of people and some of them comment a lot, your My Network Activity page will be mainly populated with a lot of meaningless comments. Some members comment on as many things as they possibly can, just for the points. Seeing what they're commenting on won't help you find things you might enjoy reading, because they're commenting on everything. If, like me, you can only see the one most recent page of your network's activity, all those pointless comments will render your network activity page useless, unless you change it with the drop-down menu to 'articles only' listings.
I've found it very helpful to only connect with people who have a good eye for finding the stuff I might also like. I prefer to only connect with people who comment on things they're really interested in, instead of bulk commenting for the points. When I check what they've been commenting on, I tend to find more articles I like without having to spend as much time looking for them. This works in reverse, too. If the people you're connected to have more or less the same philosophy, they'll read and comment on almost everything you publish. They'll join in the conversations that you've joined in, in the comment threads of other members' articles.
One last thing, I dislike the navigation tools in the new gather. Instead of using them, I created a gather bookmark folder in Firefox (my browser of choice), and literally bookmarked every feature of gather that I use with any regularity. Then, I just move around within the site using my own bookmarks. I like it.
I will tell you this, however. Even though someone dinged me on it, I think it helps: In a lot of my articles I use a larger font (kind of by accident, don't tell me how it does that), and the articles are often shorter in length.
I went to one of your articles and was overwhelmed by small type and the huge, long paragraphs. It's not that I can't handle reading complex stuff, but when I'm online, I want it to be brief, to the point, and very easy on the eyes.
Loooong paragraphs in particular are hard to scan in an online article. I will often try to scan the article first to see if it's interesting. People will take some time to get to the point and if the article doesn't grab me right away, I'll often skip it.
So make sure your first paragraph or two is as engaging as possible.
Beyond that, pick a controversial topic, write a snazzy outrageous headline, and you're good to go.
They just take up way too much screenspace for basic things...the font is WAYYYYY too big (even though I think a slightly larger font is better for articles sometimes).
I'm commenting less because the pages load slower. And I'm on Firefox.
I do use Bookmarks.
The left margin was great. I do miss it a lot.
Steph has a point about long paragraphs.
The reason my paragraphs are the sie they are is that in newspaper columns, it was determined by who? what? a long time ago that people only liked to read short graphs in newspaper columns.
My graphs are short for that reason. It helps. A Word Times Roman 12 or so helps the eyes.
The average age on Gather is about 44.
the point about connecting to people is that the email notification of comments or publshing will be in a lot of email notification inboxes.
But a lot of Gatehrers are inactive currently, as compared to a few weeks ago. Contacts need to be updated to reflect the changning membership.
Also, the summer thing held true. Since I wrote the piece I've been running around like crazy with summer stuff and this is first chance i've had to sit down, and on;y for a minute before running around today.
Right after, there were 600 published the first 24 hours, then 200 the next two days.
I think most of the slowdown is due to summer vacation, though it could be Gather, too, I suppose.
Seems kinda funny... the invitation I received said that it was "MySpace for Grown-Ups" yet here I am, less than twelve hours after joining, listening to some guy cry because he's not getting enough comments.
Gather "Might" be for grown-ups, but I haven't found any real network of Actors and Filmmakers here... At the same time, the "Kids" on MySpace don't whine and complain when I read what they have to say without leaving any comments.
I enjoy reading what others have to say, without feeling obligated to comment. Learning something new, or being entertained is far more worthwhile to me than any "Points" I might gain by adding useless comments.