My mother passed a few years ago, but when she was with us she carried a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia. The World Health Organization has termed schizophrenia as one of the top 10 most disabling conditions in the world.
The American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV) states that incidence worldwide for schizophrenia remains at 1 in 100 individuals.
The DSM-IV also states that incidence in the U.S. in urban areas tends to be a bit higher, for several reasons. Except for large urban settings in the U.S. where certain disenfranchised peoples may be misdiagnosed as schizophrenic, the incidence worldwide remains at 1 percent of the general population. This makes schizophrenia a very common illness.
I have written before about my mother, in My Mother, A Beautiful Soul, Schizophrenic and Mom, All I Ever Wanted Was You, but now I want to address how I feel about the mental health system.
The mental health system has improved greatly since my mother had her breakdown in 1960. She was 34, in excellent health, a housewife and mother with three beautiful girls, a successful husband, and a career as a lab technician. She had everything going for her. She was an artist who painted in oils and exhibited at the university. She studied languages and mandolin, she was an ardent seamstress.
She had phoned my father at work, complaining that men were in the house. My father knew immediately that something had gone terribly wrong. He brought his boss, the department chairman, at the university where he taught.
Together, my father and his boss saw what was happening to my mother. From what I was told, she was panicked at the men who were there in the house with her. I don't know if she saw them, or if she only heard their voices.
She spent 30 days in the county hospital, in the locked ward. There were no medications given, though one did exist, at that time. Every day, they wheeled her to the ECT room, where they strapped her down and fed her electrical shocks until she went into seizures.
This would erase her bad memories, they said. This would help erase some of the 'breakdown in thought control'.
After that month, she returned home. She was remote, she had changed. ECT therapy causes damage to neurotransmitters, severing connections and creating some brain damage. Her intelligence was not affected, but her daily living skills were.
ECT therapy is still used, but less widely so and is safer now. I've known of people who've undergone shock therapy for severe depression, and who've appreciated having had it. I do not agree with it, however, under any circumstances.
I've read a lot about the origins of shock therapy. One of the original inventors of ECT (electro-convulsive therapy) was horrified when he first saw what it had done to a patient. Apparently, he warned: "This must not become standard practice."
Today, medicines that help control delusions and voices help people with schizophrenia.
After my mother's return from the hospital, she went to see a psychologist who prescribed hypnotherapy for her, to examine the roots of her upbringing.
I don't know if my mother discussed her sexual abuse at this time in her life, or if, in fact what role, if any, her having been abused played in the development of her schizophrenia.
I subscribe to several psychiatric online newsletters. Most of the work done in psychiatry is devoted to helping individuals with psychosis, particularly, those with schizophrenia and bipolar illness.
I'm not impressed with how hospitals and private practitioners treat patients, however.
My mother received no medication for her illness from 1960 until 1978, when she had taken flight to Mexico, and was searching for 'a lost child,' the daughter she gave up to adoption in 1963. We had to bring her back from Mexico because Mexico is no place for an ill woman. If she had been placed in a Mexican jail, no one would have been able to help her.
We brought her back from Mexico and she was hospitalized for two weeks and placed under ant psychotic medication, Prolixin. Prolixin is very powerful. Prolixin, as a class of drug, won't prevent delusions or voices from happening, but it helped make sure she wouldn't act on them. These older anti-psychotics cause a lot of brain damage, in the form of tardive dyskenesia, which causes repetitive movements similar to Parkinson's disease.
My mother did extremely well on her medication. She took them regularly for several years before she decided she did not need them. She would then stop taking her medication, and, invariably, the delusions would return.
For her, her delusions centered around working for the government, particularly the FBI. Working for the FBI is a very common delusion for paranoid schizophrenics, apparently. My mother did not work for the FBI, but possessed a heart that cared about all the injustices in the world. She so desperately wanted to make a difference in the world.
Her delusions also centered around a complicated system of receiving 'communication' via a phone, by 'breathing into the phone.' She claimed to have had sex with Breshnev via the TV.
Her hospitalization in 1978 saw a new era for my mother. Her mind became stable enough for her to return to school (she already had a BS degree in Microbiology) to become a nurse. At age 52. This, she accomplished.
Her life took on new meaning. Her soul brightened. She was more involved with my two sisters and myself than she had ever been. She laughed, she wrote poetry, she continued painting.
Medication had set her free.
For this, I am eternally grateful, to have experienced the return of my mother's soul. For the last 20 years of her life, she told us stories she otherwise had forgotten. She came to visit my children. She cooked, did laundry, bought gifts for my children. She loved life and life loved her.
She was ecstatic to have been given a chance to fully participate in life again. No longer was she relegated to someone whose delusions controlled her every waking moment, someone whose delusions tortured her soul, rendered her incapable of taking care of children, or, at times, even of taking care of herself.
I have read that the newer group of anti-psychotic medications does not cause as much brain damage, as the older classes of anti-psychotics. But I've also read that the effectiveness of these medications in controlling delusions is also questioned.
Recently, I've known a few young adults who also carry the diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia. One man knows that his voices 'which seem to be from God' are not God, yet, he believes them. He knows these voices are a delusion, but no medication relieves him of these delusions.
One young woman I know is grappling with the reality that the 'voices that seem to come from out 'there' are actually coming from my mind.' These are her words, as she described them to me, recently.
Both the young man and the young woman feel stigmatized by their families. This is unfortunate. Nobody asks to contract a mental illness, a disorder of the brain. I'm impressed with research I've seen in the past two decades that describe some of the changes that occur to the brain, during the progression of schizophrenia.
How this research gets translated into what practitioners tell patients or how patients' families feel about their loved ones is not always pretty.
I've found too many practitioners still believe in older Freudian theories, such as the 'bad mother' theory of contributing to the development of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia is complex; it is not a result of bad parenting. My mother did not have bad parenting, generally.
Also overplayed is the genetic factor. This is the theory that states that the children of someone with schizophrenia are more likely to develop schizophrenia, themselves.
I question some of the methods used in creating such conclusions. When one looks at families with this illness (and when one finds a parent and children who also have this illness), I don't think it is possible to really separate genetic causes from environmental causes.
I don't think we've isolated specific genes for schizophrenia, at least, not yet. Environmental causes, such as lower socio-economic status (why does this illness have a greater prevalence in the U.S. among the lower socio-economic groups if the worldwide incidence is at 1 percent of the population?) cannot be ruled out.
There are so many questions left that I cannot answer. Do these new anti-psychotics work? Do they cause less brain damage? Is psychiatry treating our loved ones with schizophrenia in a gentle and professional manner? Is science advancing in its quest to discover the origins and cure for schizophrenia? Are patients less unhappy? Are loved ones less unhappy?
For scientists, schizophrenia is complex. For afflicted patients, it is hell. For loved ones, it is a curse.


Comments: 72
One thing that has always fascinated me is that thin line between madness and genius. There are so many wonderfully creative people (and your mother sounds like one of them) who suffer from mental illness. I often wonder if the mind has difficulty accepting its own greatness.
I doubt that genetics is the overriding factor in schizophrenia. I say that because I know identical twins, one schizophrenic and the other OK. Of course that's just one pair of twins, and their lives aren't over yet, but if I were doing research on this, I'd love to look at whether this is significant.
I'm very glad that your mother recovered enough to spend the last 20 years of her life as a happy and loving person!
Mental illness is a terrible thing for all involved, and until the medical community and the insurance companies recognize it as a true illness, it will not get better.
Thanks for posting this.
I'm so glad your mother was able to regain her life and live with joy again. Thank you so much for sharing this very personal experience. The more people talk about real life situations like this, the more we all understand. As others have said, this is an important topic and you have written very well about it. I want to add that schizophrenia does not look like the picture that is so often portrayed in the media. When I first started working in the mental health field, I was surprised to learn that a person with a mental illness was 4 times as likely to be a victim than the average person in our society. Sometimes, even now, tv and movies fan the fire of misunderstanding by identifying a crazy murderer as schizophrenic or bipolar. From my understanding, it is no more likely for a person with one of these illnesses to be a murderer than the average person in our population. However, it does happen at times and that is what the media focuses on. That very atypical schizphrenic person who listened to his/her "voices" that told him to kill someone. Unfortunately that only increases fear and misunderstanding towards those who most need to be better understood.
All that must have been a lot for you to attempt to comprehend as a child.
Yes there is on going research going on all the time, schizophrenia is a a chemical imbalance in the brain, too much serotonin is deposited in the brain, causing a chemical imbalance, some research will say it is epineprhine that is culprit, therapies are changing, at the hospital I interned at they were using cognitive psychology not psycho analytic approaches.
Yes, ECT leaves a lot to be deisred, though, I, too, have heard of people being helped with it.
Ann, sorry about your sister. It is such a difficult illness and the treatment so imperfect. Thanks for your comment.
I don't really believe the dx of borderline personality disorder, by the way. Here is often means that a pschytiasrist had an antipathry to the patient, that the patient's symptoms do not fit into a category and that BD is the cause.
I think a lof ot people who've had a psycnootic epidos need to spend a LOT more time with people, and a lot LESS time bein locked up. In England, parrots go crazy if they are not in constant social activity.
Of course you know I'm bipolar. I couldn't imagine being afflicted with scizophrenia. For about a year I went to out pateint treatment every day, 5 days a week with bipolars and scizophrenics and witnessed the terrible effects of both the disease and the side effects of thier meds. It is truly horrible. So many had to have such large doses to control their illness that it render them helpless. But this is not always the case. I myself also take three anti psychotic medications, but they are not of the strongest kind and do not have such bad side effects but work wonders for me. It's really all trail and error still in the mental health field.
As far as research goes, I am now taking part in a genetic study on bipolarism (I think that is a word? If not, it is now. Haha!) I just answered a 10 page survey, will spend about 10 hours on the phone with them at the university, and I just sent in three tubes of blood to be studied to help further determine where the DNA comes into play in all this. I hope they are doing the same for scizophrenia.
This is a very insightful and emotional article about a very difficult subject. Observing a loved one go through the difficulties of Schizophrenia is all too familiar to many of us. The questions about what efficacy the newer anti-psychotic medications have is still being worked out. Zyprexia does seem to work very well for some Schizophrenics. The long term effects of these meds are not yet known. Tardive Dyskinesia and even Parkinson's are all too common long term effects of the older medications. For many it is a trade off if they can have some productive years where they are not haunted as much by the voices in their heads. Thank you for the article.
Thank you for sharing.
These hospitals were designed like country clubs and offered the patients activities such as billiards and fishing. Often the patients grew their own food. I tend to like this treatment versus allowing many of our mentally ill to live homeless on the street. There is an underlying philosophy of treating patients with dignity even if they cannot fit into the structure of the world at large. Of course, this idealism ended once it was observed that many patients at these facilities had advanced cases of untreated syphilis, thus it could be claimed that their immoral behavior led them to mental instability.
The overreaching idealism of political eras defines the treatment of the mentally challenged. If there is a Puritan morality then funding for mental health is cut - patients live on the streets until the commit crimes. If there is a spirit of compassion mental health hospitals will at least attempt to treat and provide services (even if many of the actual treatments and services are experimental - at least there is concern).
You bring up some excellent points. Thank you !
Genetics is absolutely a contributing factor in this disease. While 1% of the general population is affected by this disorder, rates of schizophrenia are 10 times higher among close biological relatives of those with the diagnosis. However, environmental factors also play a part. Schizophrenia in an identical twin does not mean that the other twin will develop it. The predisposition to the disorder is inherited, but there must be an environmental "trigger" that activates the predisposition.
Mental health treatment in this country has advanced tremendously over the last century. And while ECT was more common in the early 1970s (when my grandfather had it), there are many more medications and other treatment options today. The number of antidepressant medications available today is staggering. For most people, one of them will be effective. ECT is still utilized as a last resort in folks for whom medications don't work adequately. While it seems scarey and severe, many people analyze the cost-benefit equation in their lives and decide that it is preferable to continuing to live with debilitating depression.
While it is notable that individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia tend to have a lower socio-economic status, one must consider the possibility that symptoms of this disorder (hallucinations, delusions, poor judgement, communication problems) may make it extremely difficult to maintain a high standard of living. It is not necessarily a biased diagnosis of those with lower SES.
I think it is important to understand that people who have mental disorders are not the embodiment of those disorders. For example: Joe may have schizophenia. He is not a schizophrenic. For some folks, I know, this is just a semantic point. But when we are concerned about the stigma that mental illness carries, we each have to be careful to avoid adding to that stigma. There is far more to a person than his/her mental disorder. It is only a small part of who they are.
Thanks for sharing your experience, Kathryn. It gives us a lot to think about.
I do believe that genetics is a factor and environmental factors, too. I wrote an article just a day or so later,
Can Abuse Cause Paranoia - Or Schizophrenia?
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474976770686
to introduce the topic of environmental factors.
As my mother's firstborn and one who saw her transform and who helped her through a lot of her difficulties, I used to worry if I, too, would succumb to this illness.
It took years to realize I would not.
Yes, we are not the diagnosis. That seems to be a fairly recent change in the way people 'who carry the diagnosis of schizophrenia' are mentioned.
Most people still don't get that message.
Agreed that medications are incredibly helpful and that yes, hopefully one of them will work.
I've met a few young people recently (as mentioned in the article) with schizophrenia...they were treated much better than in my mother's day.
I agree that the mental health system leaves a lot to be desired. Even they do not understand all the complexities that exist, yet some claim to be "experts". What the hell is that if they do not have all the facts? How can they even think they are an expert? To me, a good psychiatrist is not afraid to say "I am not sure". If they say anything else on Schizophrenia, they would be lying. And yes, too many people are too quick to judge someone with a mental illness. Even today, it is especially hard if your family does not accept and try to help.
i too continue to work on recovery from the mental health system. as a survivor of sexual abuse and the mental health system, and someone who has worked directly with women as a group leader, i have a great deal i could say about mental health treatment. in fact, i am contemplating a book on the subject.
in hospital, i became fast friends with a man with schizophrenia, and we have been friends now since 1989. thus, i have experienced what a terrible disease it can be. he is a talented artist, a genius in so many areas, and he has shown his paintings over the country. but i watch the illness, and moreover its treatment, take its toll upon his body. he looks terrible today, and i worry.
it took nearly a decade for to get the proper diagnosis of ptsd, something the mental health system too often overlooks in women (and men outside of war). thus, i was treated for everything else. i have a mild case of tardive dyskenesia from first generation anti-psychotics. second generation gave me diabetes. there is a class-action lawsuit currently moving forward in the states and in canada for the latter, zyprexa, and i'm thinking about joining it for several reasons beyond my own damage.
i have a lot to say about the overuse of antipsychotics, but i will save it for another day. for now, just let me embrace you and say how brave you are. they are the shameless who will break the stigma of mental illness. long live the shameless. xoxoxox ~laura
Laura, a lot to be said against the many rather ignorant practitioners in the field when it comes to SA and PTSD. Many practitioners still go into the field to figure themselves out. I have found most practitioners only offer a one-horse or maybe two-horse solution. And yes, the anti-psychotics are terrible - and the second generation do not help that much against psychosis and yes, join that suit.