The US Senate is expected to vote as early as Tuesday on a Bosnia-style plan to subdivide Iraq on ethnic lines, touted by backers as the sole hope of forging a federal state out of sectarian strife.
Though the measure is non-binding, and would not force a change in President George W. Bush's war strategy even if it passes, the vote will provide a key test of an idea drawing rising interest in Washington.
Advocates say the plan, championed by Democratic senator and presidential hopeful Joseph Biden, offers a route to a political solution in Iraq that could allow US troops to eventually go home without leaving chaos behind.
A loose autonomous federation of Kurdish, Shiite and Sunni entities might look good on paper, but critics charge it ignores Iraq's ethnic stew, such as cities where ethnic groups live side-by-side and inter-marry, and are not divided by lines on a map.
"Critics have come along and said 'I don't like your plan,'" Biden said, adding: "if you don't like Biden's proposal, what is your idea?"
The plan, drawn up with former Carter administration foreign policy expert Leslie Gelb, would provide for a federal system as permitted by Iraq's constitution, stop Iraq from becoming a failed state and:
- Separate Iraq into Kurdish, Shiite and Sunni entities, with a federal government in Baghdad in charge of border security and oil revenues.
- Aim to defuse sectarian violence by offering Sunnis a share of oil revenues.
- Boost reconstruction aid and debt relief.
- Launch an international diplomatic effort to rally the world's great powers and Iraq's neighbors to the new federation's cause.
The plan, offered as an amendment to a defense policy bill, already has achieved what many other Iraq war measures have failed to do: attract support from across the political chasm carved in Washington by the war.
Several Republicans, who back Bush's troop surge strategy, but bemoan political deadlock in Baghdad, have signed on.
"We have a flawed political design that we are pushing currently in Baghdad," said Republican presidential longshot Senator Sam Brownback, one of 11 co-sponsors of the bill.
Republican Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison looked for inspiration to the Dayton Peace Accords which led to the creation of a semi-autonomous Muslim-Croat federation and a Bosnian Serb Republic.
"I think what we have seen in Bosnia is a lessening of tensions when there is a capability for the security forces, the educational and the religious sects to have their own ability to govern within themselves," she said.
Critics, who have included the White House, have argued Biden plan is a recipe for more chaos in Iraq.
US ally Turkey would oppose such an initiative, fearful of unrest among its Kurdish population, they say, adding that a partitioned Iraq would lead outside powers like Iran and Saudi Arabia to bolster rival ethnic militia.
Other critics say frontier drawing in the Middle East by western powers has caused enough historical heartache, and it should be up to Iraqis to shape their future.
Some also say that partitioning Iraq, even if Baghdad remains whole, could encourage ethnic cleansing.
US ambassador to Baghdad Ryan Crocker backed devolving of power to Iraqi regions, but opposed a formal partition during an appearance in Congress this month.
"Baghdad, in spite of all of the violence it has seen and all of the population displacements, remains a very mixed city, Sunnis and Shia together," Crocker said.
"Any notion that that city of over five million people can be neatly divided up or painlessly cleansed of a huge number of people is just incorrect."
The bipartisan Iraq Study Group, which delivered recommendations in December warned partition could trigger mass population flows, the collapse of the fragile Iraqi security forces and ethnic cleansing by strengthened militias.
But Biden argued that all other options have failed, and says Iraq's ethnic groups are already separating.
"President Bush, and many Democrats continue to cling to choice number one," he said in a campaign mailing to supporters at the weekend, arguing US troops could not "build or force unity where none exists."
|
by
Joe Biden
Member since:
August 20, 2007 Senate to Vote on Iraq Division Plan
September 24, 2007 05:18 PM EDT
views: 82
|
rating: 7.8/10
(4 votes)
|
comments: 12
Please provide details below to help Gather review this content. If it is found to be inappropriate and in violation of the Gather Terms of Service, action will be taken.
You have successfully submitted a report for this post.
|
|
You might also likeMore by Joe Biden |
|||||||
About Gather |
Engagement Marketing |
Make New Friends |
Gather Points |
Advertise on Gather |
Gather Press |
Privacy |
Terms of Service |
Community Guidelines
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Version 16836, "Oz"; Copyright © 2009 Gather Inc. All rights reserved.


Comments: 12
You can learn more about Joe's plan at http://www.planforiraq.com.
It is no one else's business. Get our people out of there and let them come home. Iraq has a government, let them make some decisions and function as a government without interference from anyone.
ACTUALLY the Iraqi constitution calls for such divisions. Setting aside for the moment our American desire to simply see things go the way we say, their constitution calls for most of what the Biden-Gelb plan describes, and it is the ONLY plan anyone has put forward that has a hope in hell of working. To be honest, it's the only plan anyone has put forward.
Has anyone asked the Iraqi's or do we just tell them this is how its going to be? Just wondering with being an autonomous country and all.
"Millions died" AFTER WWII? In the Marshall Plan? It wasn't exactly easy but I believe the reconstruction of Europe was effective and efficient considering the destruction from which it was born.
Ty:
Yugoslavia DID work. The killing there happened before the Dayton accords. Now there is peace there, even some prosperity in some places, and STILL not one American death. That is not "endless war." What we have in Iraq is endless war.
There is NO MILITARY SOLUTION possible in Iraq, only a political, negotiated settlement has even a hope of working.
Yes they did. My mother and grandmother got to experience the effects of countries being devided into sectors. But dont take my word for it. Look it up for yourself if you read the history of Austria and Germany between WWII end and signing their independence treaties.
Yugoslavia WANTED to be split up. That is what their war was all about. It just took our brilliant diplomats years to figure that out. Iraq has clearly stated that they do not favor getting split up so who are we to tell a sovereign nation what they should do. But looking at it from a logical standpoint. You have the north which WANTS to split. This causes some problems for Turkey though but lets not worry about them right now. The southern part might be ok with splitting but the REAL problem and the reason for the surge has been the center of Iraq. There sunni and shia live together side by side. How would you split that appart?
I am sure you have already thought of the technical difficulties of relocating people and made sure that the infastructure is in place to support mass movement of people. What will we do with homes? Or do you prefer an SS type "relocation strategy" where you take peoples properties away and simply allocate it to new incoming people?
Bottom line, this is NOT a new strategy. Its been discussed for years and the Iraqi's dont want it. So instead of having the Senator drum up support in the US, he is really talking to the wrong people. He should go to Iraq and try and sell the idea and offer our asssistance to make this happen. If they want to do it, am all for it...but again I do not think this is NEW and it certainly has not been thought through.
"On October 11 (2005), Iraq's parliament approved legislation to implement the constitution's articles on federalism. Prior to the British colonial period and Saddam's military dictatorship, what is now Iraq functioned as three largely autonomous regions."
"Using our influence is not the same as imposing our will. With 140,000 Americans at risk, we have a right and an obligation to make known our views."
>>>All taken verbatim from the plan<<<<br>
And as for your point about "He should go to Iraq and try and sell the idea and offer our assistance to make this happen." He has, 19 times so far. And since this article was posted the US Senate voted 75-24 in favor of this plan.
As for whether it is "new" or not, I don't care. In your lifetime or mine, there will not be a military solution the the troubles in Iraq, it just won;t happen without a political settlement. You don't like Biden's idea? The Iraqis don't like it? Fine! by all means, suggest one that is more likely to succeed.
And today is day 1631 since President Bush's declaration of "mission accomplished" in Iraq.
art of paul batou