Elizabeth Edwards was lucky. She and her husband can afford the best health care.
I was diagnosed with breast cancer December 14, 2004. The cancer was Stage 1 DCIS, but there were 2 sites on my left breast, one at about 5 o’clock and one at about 10 o’clock, so it was decided that I should have a modified radical mastectomy. (In the workups my doctor did before surgery, it was discovered that I have a natural narrowing in one of the blood vessels leading to my heart.) But, the job I had just started said they’d hold my position open for me till I recovered from surgery.
I had the mastectomy on Jan 3, 2005. Less than a week after the drains were removed, I had to have emergency surgery to remove my gall bladder. My workplace then said they “didn’t feel comfortable” with holding my job open any longer, so they let me go. At the end of January, the COBRA I had from a previous job ran out. So, there I was with the “launch window” to commence chemo closing and no insurance to pay for it. Thank God for “Project Access”, a program for low-income people who need medical help. They got an oncologist to agree to treat me for free till I could get on Medicaid. Also, one of the coordinators I had spoken to suggested I apply for temporary disability with Social Security. It was on the basis of disability that I got on Medicaid.
C hemotherapy started March 16. I had 4 treatments, ending in June. (I was bald on my birthday J ). My primary care provider had detected abnormalities in an abdominal ultrasound she had me take, so my oncologist recommended a uterine biopsy to assure all of us that giving me Tamoxifen would not give me uterine cancer. The biopsy results came back showing at least a pre-cancerous condition, so my OB-GYN recommended a hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. This was done on September 9.During all this, I kept telling myself, “Just get through this, and you can get reconstructive surgery.” This would include reconstruction of my left breast and, since I have very large breasts, a reduction of the right one. After all, it was my understanding that practically all insurances approve this surgery since it impacts a woman’s emotional and mental health. I made an appointment with a reconstructive surgeon, and was scheduled for surgery on her first available date -- May 9, 2006.
In January, 2006, I got a letter saying that my Medicaid was approved through January 2007. Then, in March, I got another letter saying that, since I hadn’t completed and returned their eligibility renewal form, I was being cut off. I had never received the form, and called to tell them so. I got another form and returned it completed. In April, they told me I was being cut off because I wasn’t disabled and never was; Medicaid had been granted in error. In fact, I should consider myself lucky if they didn’t bill me to recoup the money that had been paid on my behalf. I asked for a “fair hearing” to dispute the decision. (When a fair hearing is requested, no action is taken till the hearing has been held.)
On May 8, I called the hospital to see when I needed to report the next day. They suggested I call my reconstructive surgeon’s office. I was told by the receptionist that the surgery had been cancelled since I had no insurance. That was how I found out that my Medicaid had been cancelled. To this day, I have heard nothing regarding the requested fair hearing, except that I have not been covered since May of 2006.
I applied for Washington state’s Basic Health program. (I should mention that my husband and I are supporting his 3 adult children, only one of whom contributes to the household financially.) Since we don’t have any legal dependants, only actual ones, they want to charge me $140 a month premium plus $15 co-pays for office visits and meds. Plus more if the hospital enters the picture. My disabled husband makes $1104 a month SSD, and I work for ($7.63) minimum wage, 20 hours a week. (The eldest child gives us $300 a month for her room and board.) There is no way we can afford to insure me.
So, I feel betrayed by the system all the way around. Until recently, I was looking for a new job (Thank goodness, I found one. It's temporary, so no insurance.) Most employers see on my resume that I didn’t work between 12/29/04 (I had an angiogram and couldn’t work the next day) and 12/12/06. They don’t seem to care why, they just aren’t interested in hiring me. My present employer would love to hire me permanently, but they are under-funded and can’t afford me. The two bras I got while covered by Medicaid are wearing out, and I can’t afford to replace them. I have tried to remain positive throughout all this, but it’s getting harder all the time.
When one is looking death in the face, the last thing one should have to think of is how to pay for the necessary treatments. There are a lot of people coming down on the Edwardses because they decided to keep on with their lives after the cancer recurred. At least they had the choice; those of us on the other end of the income spectrum have none. Plus, "keeping on with life" probably won't include going to a doctor for treatment until it's too late. Poor people are MUCH more likely to die of preventable conditions.
W e Americans should be ashamed that "the best country in the world" is comfortable treating its citizens like this. We need a national health-care plan, accessible to all.


Comments: 21
I work for a large retailer who is regularly accused of a very interesting version of "corporate welfare" - many of their employees are so poorly paid that they're eligible for a variety of state and federal benefits designed for people who live at poverty level. Depending on whether or not you ask our government or the United Nations, I am either at, or more than ten thousand dollars BELOW poverty level, and have been for a few years now.
It's tragic that there isn't a better solution in this country. However, I think in the end, if costs are going to be manageable, it will have to be a manged whole-health plan, and most Americans will be reluctant to accept such a thing. Being told that in order to have health insurance you can't eat whatever you want, can't weigh whatever you want, and are expected to complete mandatory daily exercise will not sit well with people who believe they live in the "Land of the Free."
Sometimes it's hard for me not to think that the US attitude toward the poor is "...let them die, and decrease the surplus population!"
Medicare didn't pay all of the bills for chemo and her oncologist sent her to another clinic because he said that he couldn't afford to pay for her medicine. And they called and hounded her for payments. When she finally got on Medicaid, too, he wanted her to come back for treatment at his office.
Mommy passed away this past February at my home and I am still so angry over everything that she went through. I don't know if I'll ever get over it.
I wish you the best, Jeannie B.
Universal health care won't solve some of the problems that we want it to deal with, and make a lot of other problems worse. Many countries in Europe have universal health care, but a lot of people there hate it because there's a massive backlog for treatment, sometimes lasting for months. Both the availability and quality of health care would inevitably suffer. It also wouldn't bring the total cost down very much, and it might increase the total cost.
I just read an article in the Financial Analyst Journal that says we have a projected deficit of $65 trillion in projected government spending, almost all of it being from social security and medicare, with medicare being by far the largest expenditure. With the population aging, people demanding more health care, and people living longer, we would have to increase payroll taxes 14.4%, even while calculating an expanding economy and worker productivity, and that's if the new taxes don't hurt the economy. Basically, we're going to have to make big concessions in entitlement spending (including medicare and social security) or we're going to have to greatly increase taxes for everybody, and have a large negative effect on our economy. And that's not just right-wing propaganda, that's a fact.
We could also raise the earnings cap on Social Security. Maybe even means-test benefits so the very rich don't receive them. Both those strategies would go a long way toward reducing the deficit. Of course if the right wing had left the Social Security trust fund alone and didn't add it to the general fund, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
Social Security is not something-for-nothing, it's an annuity that most of us pay for throughout our working lives. It would be criminal to reduce or suspend benefits to those who are basing their retirement plans on those payments, saying, "Sorry - you lose!"
Recently my mammogram came due. Last year I used a BCC (breast Cancer and Cervical) to have the mammo done for free. This year I was told the program was out of funds. I was very upset and irate actually. How can a program so important run out of funds. I contacted our governor's office. Before I knew it, I had people calling me from all branches of government and from the imaging place. I'll have my mammo and won't have to pay out of pocket.
You might want to relate your story to the governor's office or your representatives. This is a good time with all the campaigning going on.
I thought Washington was the most progressive state in terms of healthcare???
Anyway, yes, we do need some serious reform in our health care system.
I did tell my story to my elected representatives. It came as no surprise that none of them answered beyond the usual canned "I'm fighting for you" type emails.
I am sorry for your difficulties. I hope treatment was successful.
I have no health insurance, and many health problems. I feel like a ticking time bomb, just waiting for something major to come along and wipe out all my savings. My fiance wanted to add me to a policy that he could get through his insurance at work, but it was only good for a year and didn't cover pre-existing conditions. That doesn't do me any good.
Now we have to worry about Child #2, who has GI issues that the only GI doc in town won't even see her for (she owes his practice money).
Is there a loophole in the Hippocratic Oath that they're not telling us about? Doctors will try to excuse decisions like this by saying "I don't know anything about billing" or something of the like, but who owns the practice? They do. Therefore, at some point, they handed over life-and-death decisions regarding their patients to the beancounters.
I won my disability claim with Social Security!! So I'll be getting a little cash to help pay off the bills that piled up!!