|
by
Pat K.
Member since:
August 1, 2006 Is Gather snobby?
August 28, 2006 12:11 AM EDT
views: 147
|
comments: 38
I've been on Gather for a while now. It is my first open community. My initial opinion was very favorable. Unfortunately, I am getting somewhat turned off by some of things I've been reading. Since I am new and trying to figure out the best way to use Gather for me, I've run across various complaints. Apparently the Gather creators were ready for a new expansion in membership and has had many updates and changes since it's creation. I have no idea what it was like before I came, but there are rumblings of complaints sounding as if Gather has been invaded. Not only have they been invaded, but the invaders are not smart enough and creative enough to be here. It seems like some veteran Gather members are upset with the additional expansion in content. I don't know if this site was originally marketed to writers, but it seems that they feel the standard has been lowered. Moms posting freebies and deals are not welcome, recipes are a no-no, and definitely don't waste their time with posting articles written by others for the purpose of discussion. So now I am confused by the direction of Gather. I had begun to invite other mothers from the communities I usually frequent and no I am hesitant. The creators of Gather has stated in Town Hall Meetings that there is room for everyone in Gather, but is there really?
To Group:
improve.gather.com
Please provide details below to help Gather review this content. If it is found to be inappropriate and in violation of the Gather Terms of Service, action will be taken.
You have successfully submitted a report for this post.
|
|
|||||
About Gather |
Engagement Marketing |
Make New Friends |
Gather Points |
Advertise on Gather |
Gather Press |
Privacy |
Terms of Service |
Community Guidelines
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Version 16961, "Pacino"; Copyright © 2009 Gather Inc. All rights reserved.


Comments: 38
I think Gather is what you make it. I choose to ignore all those negative people and use it to have some fun. I'll probably lower my interst level after a while, but for now, it's fun!
Where does it state ANYWHERE that those posts shouldn't be on here? My Freebie Frenzy Group has 16 members after only 2 days of existence so I would think that SOMEONE here wants it here. I take that complaint to be a very RUDE and obnoxious statement.
You keep posting YOUR complaints and I will continue to post whatever the crap I want to. Isn't that what Gather is all about?
You just find one in every group, don't ya?
Maybe Gather will create a way for people to block content they do not want to see. Where people can select categories they want to view, or block what they do not.
Freebies or recipes do not bother me at all.
If I see something I am not interesting in, I don't click on it. I see no reason why others can't do the same.
Some people like this, and some people like that.....that is what makes AMERICA free and a wonderful place to live. It is people that think they can run everything that ruins it for everyone else.
Have I seen a big change? Yes, in the fact there are a lot more people than there used to be! Originally most of the people that came here considered themselve writers, but, Gather never, ever advertised that way. You are gonna get complainers no matter where ya go, some would even complain if ya hung them with a new rope!
Don't let it bother ya, ignore them, let them complain...
I read an article and comments. posted two days ago, from the CEO, Tom Gerace. Tom says they are working on adding some new things...example, individual sections just for journaling, blogging, poetry, fiction, freebies etc.
That way the snobs can stick with other snobs...LOL!! Plus a new rating system etc.
Change is on the way...always a good thing. BUT, as we all know, change generates complaints too!
The good read articles that interest them, then comment, offering encouragement, unbiased views, setting nastiness aside.
The mediocre, read articles that interest them and leave no comments at all.
The bad, read ALL articles and leave nasty, personal insulting comments.
All in all....the GOOD wins out.
If you can write poems or short stories, although I probably won't read them...I am sure there are hundreds more that will like to enlighten themselves by reading those type of posts.
That is just my two cents though.
It's funny you mention the personality of literal writing. I used to enter police reports into the computer for police officers. For a long time, everything I wrote sounded like "just the facts, maam." I am really working to make my writing more colorful, but sometimes I forget.
Minnesota Public Radio shut down their online forums several months ago and told its members (including me) to come here. You'll notice that on your profile you are asked if you listen to public radio, which station, and how often (and no, JACK FM - commercial radio at its worst - is not a valid answer). And so there is still a connection, however increasingly tenous, between Public Radio and Gather.com.
Public Radio listeners do not cotton well to commercials. So, yes, those of us who were driven here by MPR (for example) will bristle against Gather.com becoming a dumping ground for "Have you tried this great new product? It really works!" articles.
It appears that I have come across to you as unfriendly, or "snobby," or whatever. I don't represent Gather.com. I just represent myself. Sales pitches and money-saving tips are not what I came to Gather for. I came here for quality writing, intelligent conversation, and dialogue with the kind of people with whom I share common values, interests, and curiosities.
Is Gather.com snobby? No. Am I? Apparently so.
Nothing personal to anyone, I assure you. I am just trying to learn more about Gather. Without changing screens, I don't know who you are or what you have written. I have been very curious about the history of Gather and why there is a Public Radio connection. Thank you for sharing your earlier introductions to Gather because I had no idea this might be where some of my feeling is coming from. I'd like to know more about the the original purposes and members of Gather so I can understand more about its active members. In other communities where the content is group based (think Yahoo or Geocities) there is plenty of room for everything from Carseats to Nuclear Physics because the Groups don't overlap. The same for bulletin board based groups. This set up is different from any internet community I've participated in. I originally came to gather for intelligent adult conversation and clever writing. For me, a combinations of those elements plus the practical uses such as product recommendations would make a complete community for me. I must say that I am shocked at the tone of some of the responses to this article. I'm just trying to learn to use and maneuver the site.
Take care.
When I scroll through the "recent articles" page and I can see company and product names (in the title or in the first few preview lines) before I even click on an article to read it, the "it's easy to ignore" argument rings pretty hollow.
This morning a member published an article saying "This product is great! Try it!" They did not identify themselves as a Bzz Agent, but they are a member of the bzzagents group, which means that in all likelihood they are a Bzz Agent. Isn't it a violation of your Bzz Agent Codes of Conduct to promote an item WITHOUT first identifying yourself as a Bzz Agent?
This is why I am opposed to the "invasion."
You will find your niche.
gather.com is a reflection of any and every community I have ever been part of, family, school, community, workplace, church.
It is always possible to find a way to enjoy what you are part of. We are all always part of . . . .
I was unclear as to the purpose of Gather. Is it to bring people of like interests together? Is it to bandy about different opinions of the news of the day? Is it for fledgling writers to get a crack at being published?
None of this was made apparent when bzzagent asked us to join Gather. It's like, here it is, try it out. You can't make reports on the Gather bzzblast. They only want your opinions if they survey you, and so far, I've gotten no survey requests. I dont' think that bzzagent knows that there are so many anti-bzzagent people on Gather.
My idea of Gather is that it's a internet website like Myspace, but more mature in nature.
I feel like I've met a lot of interesting people on Gather, and that it's expanded my world just a little bit. I don't mind recipes (I've found it useful!), or looking at freebies. If I don't like something or it doesn't pertain to me, I just go to the next article or photo or group. It's like TV, don't like it, turn the channel or turn it off.
And this press release (" LEADING BOOK PUBLISHER, MEDIA AND BEST-SELLING AUTHORS TAKE INNOVATIVE LEAP ONTO GATHER.COM") would seem to support the idea of Gather.com as a "writer's website."
Granted, Gather.com has grown in fits and starts and perhaps no longer fits the definition of a "Public Radio" or "Writer's" website, but there are many of us who feel that it still should.
This is what I was trying to find out. I have a little better understanding now.
Gather IS large enough for everybody. At last count (April) Tom Gerace said Gather had 25,0000 registered members and many times more unregistered members.
At that time, I was receiving about 600 email notifications in my inbox; now, I have about 4,000 email notifications every day...
Who knows how many people are registered?
In July, about 200 articles were published per day. I counted them. At last count, one day last week, I counted 700 articles published in one day.
Read what you want, ignore the rest.
The people who have commented here all have great articles - check them out...Stick with the kinds of content you know and love - if its freebies, then stick with that.
Plenty of people publish jokes and email forwards. I don't do that and I don't read them. But I find nothing wrong with that, as long as they say that they were not the originators of those items.
Gather.com is a microcosm of society; it is made up of all educational, age, and socioecconomic levels.
Gone are the days back in April when Tom Gerace stated that Gather's average age was 44 and that 70 percent had a college degree.
There are people of all political and religious affiliations, as it should be.
Have a great day, Pat!
Gather IS large enough for everybody. At last count (April) Tom Gerace said Gather had 25,0000 registered members and many times more unregistered members.
At that time, I was receiving about 600 email notifications in my inbox; now, I have about 4,000 email notifications every day...
Who knows how many people are registered?
In July, about 200 articles were published per day. I counted them. At last count, one day last week, I counted 700 articles published in one day.
Read what you want, ignore the rest.
The people who have commented here all have great articles - check them out...Stick with the kinds of content you know and love - if its freebies, then stick with that.
Plenty of people publish jokes and email forwards. I don't do that and I don't read them. But I find nothing wrong with that, as long as they say that they were not the originators of those items.
Gather.com is a microcosm of society; it is made up of all educational, age, and socioecconomic levels.
Gone are the days back in April when Tom Gerace stated that Gather's average age was 44 and that 70 percent had a college degree.
There are people of all political and religious affiliations, as it should be.
Have a great day, Pat!