It is exciting today to see organic produce at the supermarket. Organic growing is a common practice now. Organic farming methods involve methods to minimize pesticide use and avoid chemical sprays. These farming methods are producing fruits and vegetables that are more healthful for us to eat.
Unfortunately, we are "commercializing" organic foods. Now, the organic produce you see is likely to come from a great distance. Shipped clear across the country or even imported from other countries. It is still "organic" in the general sense. But we have lost the interaction between grower and eater. Now the produce is being handled multiple times and we are using more of our valuable fuels to get this "organic produce" to the big supermarket chains. We are loosing site of our original concept.
I am a firm believer in "sustainable agriculture," but what exactly is that? It means "putting as much back into the land as you take away, so that the land can continue producing indefinitely". In my garden, I use practices to add nutrients back to the soil to replace those harvested in crops, reusing nutrients by applying my livestock manure to raised beds. I use "integrated pest management" which allows me to use a minimum of intervention between my garden plants and the pests which attack my produce. I also sell locally, so that what I produce is consumed locally. This reduces the use of fossil fuel. Sustainable agriculture puts the eater face to face with the grower.
Our lives and the way we consume are not sustainable: non-renewable resources, especially fossil fuels, are being depleted in alarming rates. Soon, the earth's resources will no longer support the earth's population. Organic farming used to be sustainable, but the big business that they are becoming, is not. The long distance shipping that is now common place is burning up our non-renewable fuel. The high cost of fuel is adding to the cost of organic products. Soon, consumer demand will go down and organic products may not be so readily available.
It is not good to have all of our food produced by a few large companies. Diversity is lost. Quality is compromised. Large corporations have more clout with government and thus regulations may be eased. It is easier for disease to spread on large farms with concentrations of livestock and crops. It is in our best interest, as eaters, to support local farms. Locally grown food is less expensive. It tastes better because it is fresh and in season. If you know the farmer that raises your meat, you also know he cares for his livestock and if he takes pride in what he produces. When you buy locally, you are able to visit the farm and meet the farmer; get to know the grower as a person. Local farms offer more selection. Often, heritage varieties are found, with more food value and more flavor.
As small farms are lost, the countryside is developed. Those lost farms are never regained. Never again, does that land produce food. You can help by supporting local farmers in your area. Buy from Farmer's Markets and buy directly off area farms. Most farmers welcome the opportunity to market directly to the consumer. Get to know the person who produces the food you eat. You won't be disappointed!


Comments: 24
And thanks for emphasizing the importance of making the connection between the consumer and the producer. We buy most of our fresh fruits and vegetables from farmer's markets within close proximity to where we live. As a nation, we need more farmers' markets in low-income urban neighborhoods so more people have access to food far healthier than you'll find in a 7-11.
I also agree that corporate agriculture is a huge problem. But that fight was lost a long time ago. So I don't begrudge agribusiness if they are authentically engaging in organic practices in response to market demand. Even if it isn't ultimately sustainable, it's better for the planet for agribusiness to use less pesticide and fertilizer than before.
It might also be worth mentioning that the USDA did not write the NAIS proposal, requirements, and procedures. Several corporate giants such as Monsanto and Cargill did the actual writing, commissioned by the USDA who then blessed the work and is now in the process of turning it into law. But, enough for now about USDA "circus wagons".
I believe that the absolute best thing anyone can do to protect their food supply is to know how their food is produced and all the people involved in the process. Blind trust in a giant corporation allows them to take shortcuts and push the limits of regulations, and all you get out of it is cheap, possibly adulterated food and the risk that it somehow got contaminated on the way to your table.
America desperately needs small farmers and everyone who has the knowledge, or the curiosity, or the ideals necessary to farm should take the opportunity to do so, wheather its on a hundred acres, a few square feet, or even a couple of flower pots.
It is a crime how the wool is being pulled over the consumer's eyes. I have to laugh every time I see "free range" on a corporate poultry label. Have you ever seen a corporate pasture? Yes, the chickens are outside, but they are confined into small, outdoor pens that just make the square foot requirement to be called "free range". No "pasture" survives long because the birds trample it down before they are slaughtered. This is how the big guys play the game. Free range to a small farmer means a few hundred birds or less, running around in real pasture...sometimes acres of it. The birds eat clean grass and bugs and not chicken poop deposited in overcrowded lots. I wish you all could taste a fresh, home grown chicken. It is nothing like that stinking, bacteria ridden thing you buy at the supermarket!
Corporations have found ways to compete with "Organic" and "All Natural" and even "Free Range". But, I guess the small farmer still has too large a share of the market. Either that, or the small farmer has scared the big guys because now they want them to ID tag each chicken, steer or hog. Lots of paperwork and red tape for the small farmer. Information that will be useless and laws that cannot be enforced.
The tyranny of protection carried too far destroys the freedom we're trying to protect!
:-Y expressions of anger, fear & defiance inserted here :-Y
I am on the board of a group called GardenShare. Our main goal is to educate others about buying local, food security issues and thinking about our food systems. Conversations around "organic and local" come up often. I buy local organic if possible and local if not. I DO NOT buy organic strawberries from California (I live in NY). My husband also read an article about the amount of rocket fuel residues on organic produce from California due to groundwater contamination.
I am part of a wonderful CSA. I know where my food comes and I know when the farmer is stressed or feeling good about his work. How many Americans can say that? I also am able to get local milk/cheese/eggs and we raise our own lamb. I adore looking at my plate this time of year and knowing exactly where every piece came from!
Robin
It's not the veterinary tests that prevent dairy farmers from selling their milk directly to consumers. It's the law that absolutely prohibits the retail sale of unpasteurized milk in all but a small handful of states. The only reason that raw milk cheeses are still available is that they must be aged for a minimum of 60 days before being released for sale. And USDA periodically tries to ban even that.
Robin R,
I see you haven't found the food security group yet.
it's at foodsecurity.gather.com
(end of commercial, Ha!)
WONDERFUL article. Perfect!!
Also, what if you love pineapple and live in New England? Now it's the greedy stomach vs. the principled mind...
http://www.ams.usda.gov/farmersmarkets/map.htm
Whereas I disagree with the statement: "Soon, the earth's resources will no longer support the earth's population." I think it needs more clarification: The earths resources will no longer support the population of Western Civilizations. Americans and other 1st world countries consume resources at more than an alarming rate. However, in 3rd world countries where resources are scarce recycling (or more often reusing) is more common practice.
A good point: diversity is lost. I wish there were more outlets for local foods be become both available and affordable.