One of the rules of blogging is "don't say it if you wouldn't want to read it in a Letter to the Editor." Well, here's my Letter to the Editor of the Boston Globe (published on Friday) about a rather inappropriate TV commercial during last week's AFC Championship Game, which I reprint here in it's entirety:
I'M SURE for Patriots fans the most upsetting thing about Sunday's game was that final interception. But while that led to a bucketful of tears from my 7-year-old, I knew what to say to make it better. What I couldn't explain took place earlier, when my son screamed in terror and pointed at the TV. I dived for the clicker, but not before he witnessed the brutal "murder" of a showgirl in an ad for "CSI:NY."
Now, I accept responsibility to be on clicker patrol if I let my son stay up after 9 p.m., but it was only 7:30. While I would never seek to limit what others watch, I would propose that commercials for programs such as "CSI" be restricted to a later time slot.
In the meantime, I long for the days when the most violence one might see before 8:00 on a Sunday evening would be on "Mutual of Omaha's Wild Kingdom."
And I wonder why an image of brutal murder is less controversial than Janet Jackson's mammary gland.
DIANE K. DANIELSON
Cohasset
Now, I may be the only person in America who does not watch CSI, but my guess is that they have enough viewers so that they really don't need to advertise during "family hour."


Comments: 9
And in fact, my parents do live in Europe and my child and I watch TV over there all the time and while there's lots of risqué entertainment and nudity, they don't have anything like the gratuitous violence that appears on American television.
Can I also reiterate that my child pointed it out to me, and not vice versa, and asked me why would people want to watch something like that. As a non-CSI watcher, I gave him a true answer – "I don't know why they would, but that a lot of people do." I then explained that while we should never dictate what people watch, or what the networks show, it's fair to request that they run ads for these types of shows later on in the evenings.
Michael W, thanks for the V-Chip idea, but we are actually TiVo'ing things and fast-forwarding through commercials. However, one can't do that with an important AFC game. And I have let my connections as CBS know that this was a bit inappropriate, and that they should consider pushing the time slots for these commercials back a bit.
I've already seen the 'high point' of whatever show it might be....!
The news is even worse!
They spend half the newscast telling you how THEY are your 'friends', etc etc
I'm on your side, Diane.
A little common sense is all we ask, nothing more...
And as a bleeding heart liberal, I thought long and hard over whether or not I wanted to broach a censorship issue. But, as Eric said - it's common sense. If a kid is still young enough to believe Santa Claus really exists, then he's probably not ready to handle CSI (or any ads for it), and it's reasonable to ask the networks to not show them during their own self-proclaimed "family hour".
I agree that it should be limited to later hours.