Almost. By the time this goes to press, I'm sure we will soon have 2245 pages of articles.
When I published my article last night around midnight on the New Gather, it was on page 2215.
Now, the new articles are on page 2244. Soon to be on 2245..
20 articles are on each page. Do the math: 20 articles times 30 pages = 600 articles in 24 hours.
I am surprised because I did not know that SO many articles were published in 24 hours.
By looking at my email notifications, I had assumed about 100 or 200 articles were published.
I'm not about to count my notifications to see how many are commented upon, but you can sort of check that by clicking
Articles / Most Discussed or Most Read.
A lot of people are not getting many comments; a lot are getting very few or zero comments, in fact.
After I publish this, I will personally go into Articles and read at least 10 articles by people I don't know, by people who have few or no comments, before I go to bed.
By going into Articles and scrolling through the notices of published Articles, (and commenting on some) it helps to bring out people who are new to the community, people who do not yet have many (or any) connections, people who are trying their feet in the water...
I'm hoping many of you will do the same. Jump in, the Articles pool is fine.
Don't feel you have to scroll 30 pages to get to everything published in the last 24 hours.
Gather moves at such lightening-quick speed it is impossible to catch up.
But jump aboard that moving train and you'll feel a lot more confident about navigating the New Gather.
And yes, I'm getting back to my old writing very soon. I have an article ready and waiting (since last night, actually); I'm just waiting for some of the fray to die down, so we'll all be ready to relax again.
|
by
Kathryn E.
Member since:
January 15, 2006 The New Gather: 600 articles in 24 hours
July 15, 2006 12:30 AM EDT
(Updated: July 17, 2006 10:40 AM EDT)
views: 109
|
comments: 53
Please provide details below to help Gather review this content. If it is found to be inappropriate and in violation of the Gather Terms of Service, action will be taken.
You have successfully submitted a report for this post.
|
|
You might also likeMore by Kathryn E. |
||||
About Gather |
Engagement Marketing |
Make New Friends |
Gather Points |
Advertise on Gather |
Gather Press |
Privacy |
Terms of Service |
Community Guidelines
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Version 16961, "Pacino"; Copyright © 2009 Gather Inc. All rights reserved.


Comments: 53
Somebody publish something, quick !
But I couldn't find it just now. Though I did find your comment pointint Tom to your new article.
I was mostly off this afternoon and only got back on tonight at midnight. I've known from previous experience that sometimes Gather seems slowest during 12-6 p.m. or so, or 9-6 or 9-8 Eastern Time, because both Coasts, but a lot of Europe, Asia, Australia and likely Africa, too are online. Or could be.
After midinght, less of the East Coast is online, which eliminates a certain number of people.
Does this help, Liz?
Also, have you gotten your notifications back ever? Mine were gone for an afternoon only.
Tom did say somewhere today he thought missing comments was a fluke. And that he'd look into it.
I went into Amazon Shorts the other day and read quite a lot of them. But many more have been published since then. A lot of the authors seem to be new or not well connected and a lot in the Gather community don't seem to know about them. I plant to go back in and read a lot more of them in the next couple of days, too.
Kathryn, good advice on this article.
As per weird things happening, this is pretty much what you get after the first day of such a huge change. Many of the problems can't be anticipated, others need time to troubleshoot. Right now, I think we all feel like we're groping around in the dark. I like Kathryn's advice about perusing the New Articles and checking My Gather for comments on your own articles. Hang in there folks.
but wireless is very dependent on topography, weathr and any other kind of interference. for me, I live under the main takek-off path to prague airport-- and I had great announcements coming from the tower control, but connection could break every minute, or be gone for three days--
it depends on many factors and whether or ot there is a good wifi carrier over there.
I actually don't use My Gather, (too slow for me, is it javascipt that makes it slow? it is a .jsp extension) but I use the BY ME selection after clicking Articles.
Easier at night than during midday. Today, because of the newness of the New Gather, I think everybody and his/her cousin was on, expecially for a weekday.
So, this is my cherished time.
Ed, what's your excuse?
And the resta use guys?
Any takers? By the slice....Dark chocolate pieces, mixed with cake batter and yogurt for moistness and a cup of Cognac, then baked and marinated in a bed of Cognac for 15 minutes before serving.
Oh, I forgot. I have a bottle of wine cooler I have to open. This comment made me thirsty for booze.
\The number is huge; I didn't know that till I read ur article. Wow !
Magi
But another thing worth considering is this is a new build. When developing software, at least developing good software, you insert a lot of debugging code. This code can typically be toggled on or off. When testing you leave it on. I would not be surprised if debugging asserts and alerts were left on for day one leading to seriously decreased performance. Since there appears to have been no large beta test, this would be wise. Although MOST companies would leave debug on through alpha and beta testing and turn it off for production release, but the web sort of tosses those "rules" aside and makes for a anything goes environment.
I am not making excuses for them. i have wicked fast Internet and indeed it is slow and loads with funny priorities in the way it paints the page (not something you can ALWAYS control). I am appalled by the apparent lack of testing and usability testing.
I have decided of all my complaints, the biggest one is the lack of testing or compassion for people with 800x600 or similar screen resolutions, which is a significant portion, if not majority of the users of the Internet. Developers and executives tend to have much higher resolutions, so it is often QA and marketing's job to write in the specs what resolutions should be targeted. This is, to an experienced architect of web sites, a mission critical aspect. If MOST users must scroll right to see the whole page, the site should fail testing. It is OK to probe the capabilities of the target machine and adjust output, but this is not always possible on the web the way it is on local software.
Building a web site is a complex activity involving numerous areas of focus. Some of the top areas are findability-meaning how easy can you find what you want, general usability-how quickly can tasks be accomplished, abandonment rate-how many users abort their tasks for whatever reason is a metric that must be measured and understood, performance vector-how well it works across variety of user types (dial up, broadband, old computers, new computers, big screens, small screens).
I saw a comment about ebay and Google. Let's be fair, a small startup cannot be expected to perform the way large, profitable companies can. But they can be expected to ask "what makes those site successful". In fact, when undertaking a site design I make it a point to quiz every individual involved about their favorite web sites and ask what makes them "work" for them. I then collect those attributes and ask which are reasonable goals for our project.
Lastly, sites are usually businesses, attempting to profit or break even. So a lot of thought must go to maximizing revenue recognition even if it flies in the face of other concerns, although balancing the concerns is always ideal. As I play with this new site I am beginning to grok some of the thoughts behind this new site, but remain annoyed at the usability flaws and apparent functionality loss and continue to wonder why this was not offered in a toggled manner the way Yahoo and other successful sites do it. I know it costs a little more, but I have done much research and the actual total cost is less. You see, when you've done web projects for over a decade and created some of the web functions that are among the busiest in the world, you learn some things. No book will ever give you the insight that a decade in the real world trenches will give you. Likewise, web work involves an interesting and varied cast of characters from the art department to the content producers and there is a level of experience that repeat senior management teams have in bringing these crazy people together and balancing their wildly different views on the world. I continue to hope that what we saw on day one was the result of a rushed release and the above core skill set does exist in the company producing this environment. I care because it has become a fun part of my day to hang out here.
And yes, I indeed have a bit of frustration that I wanted to bring my experience to the Gather.com team. I am not silly enough to believe the world would be perfect if I was involved, but I know that my work on Symantec.com, About.com, Lycos.com, Earthlink.com, and dozens of others with hundreds of millions of users per day renders me one of the most experienced web executives/architects in the Boston area. It is never fun to hear you are not exactly what we are looking for but it is particularly frustrating when from the outside it seems like I was exactly what they needed. I think there was a perception that they needed more of a code jockey then an executive/architect type, but pumping out more code is never smarter then pumping out the right code. After 22 years I can code faster and smarter then most IF that was the best use of my skills, but most companies find that having me work cross functionally on getting the requirements and then breaking the project up and managing the execution is a smarter use of my decades. Anyway, I sleep well at night knowing that billions of dollars and thousands of jobs have been created from my work and continue to hope that some Boston company will value what I have to offer! Maybe this is a good example for me to use when talking to VCs and executive teams interested in me that shows areas that should have been addressed. If you know of a web or software company looking for the best there is, have them email me at rich@richsad.com or see my resume at my simple homepage on http://richsad.com/about_rich.html. I know there are people in Boston area doing cool things and I am ready to go!
Ratio of comments to articles, I don't know.
Gather has mentioned (in TOS? ) that each member has 10 GB of storage space.
Yes, you are right the digital media revolution has given all of us an incredible voice, unparalleled at any time in history and not since Gutenberg has there been such an important discovery as this. That would make an excellent article, Dolphi !!!
I think Gather copes as best it can with a small staff; I'm amazed actually at tne number of hours everyone must be working. They are true Gatherholics !
True, large sites like Ebay and Google have functionality that smaller sites can't be expected to emulate.
I think that Tom is responsive to the needs of Gather members; in his article yesterday, he did comment that he's heard a lot about the orange comment boxes and is taking that issue under advisement, so to speak.
I think your experience, Rich, is excellent, and I'd hired you in a minute.
Has anyone else experienced a dropoff?
I've learned in my 6 months here (anniversary today) that as soon as something requires a click AWAY from a page onto something else, Gatherers are less likely to do this.
Read an article and click comment post. Fine.
Read an artilcle and click a link AWAY from Gather. Less fine.
Read an article and click on another article, directly. Fine.
Read an article and Click Articles, Scroll, find article, Click, Read, Click Comment. Less Fine.
Read an article and Click My Gather. Click on Network Articles. Less Fine.
I think you are correct in your assessment. I was wondering the same thing.
BUT... I have many Macs. One is a brand new 20" iMac Core-Duo Intel-based Mac with a fantastic screen with high resolution. But I am mobile sort of a guy, so my workhorse is a 2 year-old Powerbook 12" G4. The new Gather build is horrible on a small screen like this. I have a 12" Dell and a ~14 IBM and the new site is weak, at best, on those as well. Pull up some research on the screen resolution of "Main Street, World" and you'll see that the small laptops are more representative of the real world's screen resolution then some hot new computer. You have to either shoot for the common denominator (not necessary LOWEST, but mid-range at least) or have it function differently if there is not enough space. What eats me up most about this build is how "all or nothing" it is. Think how happy we'd all be if we could try it, send bug reports and commnts, then toggle back to old build?
KEO, Thank you too for the vote of confidence. I have been doing development for over 20 years with the last decade heavily focused on web sites, services and commerce/revenue oriented sites. Someone in the Boston area must be looking for someone like me. We just haven't found each other. I am eager to resolve this in the next month. I really need the stress and challenges of the development process. It is a big part of my life that is missing. So anyone with networking connections for me contact me at rich@richsad.com. I am ready to kick ass and change the world, or just make some good money, whichever a given company is out to do!
LOL! Not this article...
Rich, I think social networking already is the new killer app. Don't you think it has arrived already?
Rich, good of you to provide your email addy for people to contact you re: software engineering jobs.
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474976767364
So is this good or bad?