According to Fox News, Bank of America Corp. has begun offering credit cards to customers without Social Security numbers, typically illegal immigrants, the Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday.
In recent year’s banks across the country have been offering checking accounts and even mortgages to the nation's fast-growing ranks of illegal immigrants, adding these immigrants generally have not been able to get major credit cards.
“The new Bank of America card is open to people who lack both a Social Security number and a credit history, as long as they have held a checking accountwith the bank for three months without an overdraft, the Journal said.
Bank of America tested the program last year at five branches in Los Angeles, and last week expanded it to 51 branches in Los Angeles County, home to the largest concentration of illegal immigrants in the U.S., the Journal said.”
Question, shouldn’t these practices be viewed as domestic economic terrorism and the perpetrators held accountable? They seem to be aiding and abetting illegal activities and a larger destruction of lower and middle wage labor standards in the nation.
Or, because they are a commercial activity that special interests profit from, does that mean they live by a different, party protected, standard by virtue of their ability to finance special interests like political parties at such an excessive level?
In other words, is it acceptable to citizens for them to act in ways they destroy the country from within and lower the quality of life for it’s citizens because they can afford to pay the bribes, to special interests who benefit, while the nation as a whole is burdened with the greater costs and loss of sovereignty.
This looks to me like criminality and corruption abounds at many levels here while citizen’s rights and the nation’s interests are abandoned by Crown Party representatives. I don’t see Crown Party representatives from either side of the aisle doing, or planning on doing, anything to end this corruption. It’s quite obvious why and people ought to call them on it.


Comments: 5