Hugo Chavez has died but apparently his death is not going over well, even though it was expected. The former President died on Tuesday after battling cancer. He had not been seen in public since after surgery in 2012.
According to reports, Chavez's VP is calling out the enemies of Venezuela (including the USA) by saying that they gave the now deceased 58-year-old cancer as a way to make him ill and basically knock him off.
Seriously.

"We have no doubt that commander Chavez was attacked with this illness," VP Nicolas Maduro said. "The old enemies of our fatherland looked for a way to harm his health."
Chavez himself said that the US was responsible for his cancer and Maduro even said that it was similar to the death of Palestine's Arafat who was thought to have been poisoned by his Israeli enemies.
It's kind of crazy to think that Hugo Chavez was given cancer somehow -- whether he was injected with the genes or something else -- but with government being so corrupt, it wouldn't be surprising at all to find out that there is a way to do so.
Do you believe Chavez was "attacked" by the cancer virus?





Comments: 22
Do you believe Chavez was "attacked" by the cancer virus?
Hugo Chavez was a loudmouth communist ideological leader, a boisterous propagandist and nothing more, his death means nothing one way or the other to the American government.
To individual people around the world, his demise may well bring a sad note to the thoughts of some, inasmuch as the loss of any human life, brings to mind the frailty and vulnerability of the human body which God gave us.
It's possible that the Hugo Chavez was poisoned or infected.
We could find out if they keep samples of Chavez's tissues and DNA match the cancer to see if it is known match to something we know has been weaponized. It could be that whatever it was has yet to be made public, but someday it will be. Then it is also possible that he got cancer from some other vector. The history of the US with operations like this is something that will take a long time to live down, especially the way we are behaving in the world, to other countries, other people and even our own people these days.
--
Yet another remarkable and deadly feature of SV40 is its “stealth” ability to cause cancer.
. . . . Meanwhile, other research shows that SV40 has additional cancer-causing tricks. Sometimes the virus sets off the chain reaction that leads to tumor formation, yet manages to leave no trace that it was ever present. In virology, this is described as a hit-and-run mechanism: The virus can cause so much damage that the cell perpetuates its own malignant growth long after the virus has disappeared.
A team of scientists from Bonn has demonstrated this mechanism in rats, showing that SV40 is able to inflict damage in cells and then vanish completely. The German team injected fetal rat brain cells that had been rendered cancerous by large T-antigen into the brains of adult rats. Eighty percent of the adult rats developed a brain cancer that is the rodent equivalent of human medulloblastoma, one of the pediatric brain cancers with which SV40 has been associated and the same type that afflicted Alexander Horwin. When the Bonn researchers searched for large T-antigen in the tumors, it was no longer present in some of the cells. Yet these particular sets of transformed (or malignant) cells appeared to be even more malignant than those that were still expressing the T-antigen–evidently because without the presence of T-antigen, the immune system could no longer recognize them as a threat. Thanks to SV40, and perhaps other viruses, can induce cancer and yet not be readily detectable once tumor start proliferating rapidly. Without the presence of an immunogenic protein like T-antigen, cancer cels are less prone to immune system attack. Thus, after a certain point in tumorogenesis, cancer cells that have rid themselves of the virus have higher survival rates than those that still contain SV40, eventually replacing SV40-infected cells as the dominant subset in some expanding tumors. Yet the ultimate source for the aggressive, “stealth” cancer was still SV40.
Studies from Italy support this novel hypothesis: SV40 is dangerous as long as it is in the right tissue, even if it is not actually present in every, or even most cells. A team led by Luciano Mutti and Giovanni Gaudino discovered that a small number of SV40-infected mesothelial cells can induce malignancy in much larger numbers of nearby noninfected cells. Mutti and Gaudino found that once SV40 invades the mesothelial cells, the virus not only turns on the Met oncogene within the cells it has infected, it also stimulates those cells to send chemical signals to their neighbors, forcing them to turn on Met. Now these neighboring, uninfected cells have also been artificially switched on from a resting phase into an unnatural, hyperactive growth phase. Thus, even if only a few tumor cells contain SV40, growth factors produced by these cells will spur the malignant growth of nearby cells that do not contain the virus.
> Chavez, Kirchner, Paraguay’s Fernando Lugo, Brazil’s Dilma Rousseff and former Brazilian leader Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva have all been diagnosed recently with cancer. All of them are leftists.
How many died for disagreeing with him?
How many died of cold and starvation because of his oil sales.
I canNOT believe that some will praise him for 'helping poor americans' when it was at the expense of the misery and deaths of his own people!
Why not praise chairman mao for giving us cheap goods to help us - as hundreds of millions died?
How bout that Pol Pot eh? ANOTHER great visionary??????????????
Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Che, Castro ..... they ALL believed their visions would help - but not that it would help the poor as they said in public - it would help them in their quest for dominance - as proven in their methods, and outcomes.
Much like the idiots that worship our current leader, profess he is helping all of us, when in fact his methods and policies will destroy us.
And how DARE Jimmy Carter come out with praise for this evil, despicable excuse for a human being?
Versus how many died for opposing US economic interests or trying to live under the dictators the US has installed in South America? Why don't you answer that if you have the guts?
Oh ... I just read your next line ... and you don't know anything about what you are talking about .... are you seriously that misinformed about the world?
But First what on earth doews other actions I completely disagree with, have to do with this situation that I also completely disagree with.
As too the second- in the high country of Venezuala - the4 AVERAGE low temp is about 45 F. Some nights it gets much colder.
Evan at 55 or 60, on a poor diet, that adds to the health issues.
ANd him selling oil at a huge discount, added to the poverty of his people.
I guess I have to explain everything to some folk.
I apologize. I had presumed a minimal level of knowledge.