Brandon Turbeville) Â In an example of just how deep the roots of Agenda 21 can reach, it is now obvious that the UN-generated guidelines are making their way through state legislatures as well as the federal branch. Not only that, but such legislation has expanded from inside the boundaries of the usual suspects like California and New York, and is now even reaching into southern states like South Carolina, which have traditionally been opposed to such policies.
In a nutshell, the plan calls for governments to take control of all land use and not leave any of the decision making in the hands of private property owners. It is assumed that people are not good stewards of their land and the government will do a better job if they are in control. Individual rights in general are to give way to the needs of communities as determined by the governing body. Moreover, people should be rounded up off the land and packed into human settlements, or islands of human habitation, close to employment centers and transportation. Another program, called the Wildlands Project spells out how most of the land is to be set aside for non-humans.
The Commercial Center Retrofit Act, now in Congressional subcommittee, has been introduced under the cover of merely encouraging the South Carolina Council of Governments to adopt ordinances and guidelines that will “enable the retrofitting of shopping malls and shopping centers into dense, walkable, mixed-use town centers.â€
Now, let me first say that this idea, in and of itself, is not such a bad thing. Allowing andencouraging the retrofitting of buildings so that they use less energy, have less impact on the environment, and blend in with the rest of the community is actually something that should be encouraged. However, the Commercial Center Retrofit Act is not about encouraging such “green†improvements and environmentally-conscious building. This new resolution is solely dedicated to the implementation of Agenda 21.
Â
To encourage the South Carolina Council of Governments to adopt ordinances intended to enable the retrofitting of shopping malls and shopping centers into dense, walkable, mixed-use town centers, and to encourage other measures to promote a human habitat that is hospitable and accessible to more South Carolinians while lessening environmental impacts on the state.
Â
Â
This is another reason we are going to see the FDA with drones, they are scoping out the land masses not for our pleasure or benefit it will be to report on farmers, and those who live in the rural areas. If Agenda 21 take place in your area it will become so petty you can be arrested and or fined for to much dust. Yes dust, and those who live in the desert that seems nearly impossible. That is no joke, and no exaggeration. This is how bad it will get if enough people aren't catching on to Agenda 21.
Here is the story where it is from a new source proving that farmers are being fined for " to much dust"...
Senators fight against potential EPA dust regulation by Amy WestFarmers and ranchers getting fined for creating too much dust? As part of a Clean Air Act the Environmental Protection Agency is asking for twice as strict dust regulations. Some senators are asking the EPA to back off while it said regulating farmers is not part of its plan.
Their farm has been in John Greer's family for more than 120 years. He said dust is just part of the job.
Â
"Marketing our grain, driving up and down our gravel or unimproved roads causes a lot of dust," said Greer.
Â
That is not to mention handling livestock or harvesting crops. But as part of a five year review of Quantitative Health Risk Assessment for Particulate Matter - or dust - the EPA recommends stricter standards.
Â
"We do not know how it is going to affect us but we are afraid it will affect us big time," Greer said.
Â
They are not the only ones. 21 senators wrote EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson asking the EPA to back off. Senator Mike Johanns said the new standards would be devastating for Nebraska agriculture.
Â
"You could go to just about anywhere in the state and we would either be bumping into that or actually over it and then you have all kinds of challenges in terms of how do you mitigate dust when you are out in the field and that sort of thing," said Johanns.
Â
But an EPA spokesman said new rural regulations were never part of the plan.
http://www.khastv.com/news/local/Senators-fight-against-potential-EPA-dust-regulation-99810479.html
They are and have been getting fined :
EPA to regulate … dustemember when Democrats painted themselves as the farmer’s best friend? Here in Minnesota, the Democrats call themselves the Democrat-Farmer-Labor Party as a reminder, and even through last year Democrats stumped heavily in the Midwest with their populist agenda. I wonder whether farmers will still consider Democrats their friends when Barack Obama regulates farm dust — and penalizes them when the wind blows:
http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/02/epa-to-regulate-dust/
Â
Â






Comments: 16