The News Media last Thursday were full of reports on Syria's allegedly unprovoked mortar attack on Turkish territory which killed five civilians, including three children.Many of the more excitable foreign correspondents were predicting this could be the moment when the West is forced to intervene in the Syria's bloody civil war. At least the media have managed to move on from presenting the conflict as a one sided contest in which the tyrant Assad is slaughtering dissidents.
Whatever origin of the conflict, dissatisfaction with life under Assad, political protest against rising prices and falling living standards or a desire to live under Sharia law in an Islamic theocracy, the solution now does not lie in Syria or Turkey. China and Russia have lined up behind Assad, Europe and the US want him out.
I don't know what the big strategic picture is here, possibly that the world is reforming into three superstates run by oligarchic collectivist regimes as described in George Orwell's 1984, but I am 90% certain that there is a bigger but so far invisible agenda in operation and Syria and Turkey are just cold-war style proxies in the greater conflict that the main power blocs are reluctant to contest head to head.
Most people in the west are sick to death of hearing how we MUST sort out Libya, Egypt, Syria, Iran etc. etc. etc. Every couple of months there's some new middle eastern crisis or African humanitarian disaster that we poor taxpayers are supposed to stump up the money to sort out, no matter how much it costs while our soldiers, sailors and airmen lay down their lives in another futile contract that will resolve nothing.
For most of this year the West has agonised over how to halt the bloodshed in Syria without actually managing to formulate a convincing strategy for ending the violence. Partly this is due to the intervention of the Russians and Chinese who, with support from Iran, have blocked repeated attempts at the U.N. Security Council to agree a resolution that would actually have an impact on the conflict. At the moment Russian and Iranian ships are stationed in the Mediterranean protecting the sea lanes to Syrian ports.
The other factor that has weighed heavily on the deliberations of Western policymakers concerns the ambitions of those seeking to overthrow the regime of President Bashar al-Assad. Given what's happened in Egypt and Libya after the West enthusiastally backed the overthrow of those countries' long-standing dictators, after ill – considered interventions by politically motivated western leaders there is little appetite among the diplomatic corps or senior military personnel in Washington, London or Paris to see the emergence of another Islamist government emerge on the shores of the eastern Mediterranean.
Many voices are saying the deteriorating situation on the Turko-Syrian border could change all that. Last night an emergency meeting of Nato was convened to discuss the crisis, and resulted in the alliance condemning Syria's "flagrant violations of international law."
No hard evidence has been orffered that the Syrian government was behind the attack, in fact the notion that Syrian government-controlled forced launched cross border attacks is ludicrous.
Cui Bono. Who would gain from such attacks? The Western armament industry should NATO instigate some sort of attack on Syria perhaps, but the Islamists behind the civil war in Syria are already being supplied with western arms through Turkey and Iraq. The rebels themselves, fighting fanatically but making little progress while Assad retains the backing of Russia, are desperate for the west to intervene with air attacks So, in all likelihood these attacks originate from the 'rebels', not the government. A "False flag" operation then is high on the list of probabilities but the Syrian rebels are not the only suspect. What if the shelling was instigated by Turkey itself.
The Kurds are a problem for Turkey and have long campaigned for an autonomous region in Syria. In 2010 a Kurdish attack on Turkey with killed many civilians was proved to have been the work of Tuirkish covert operations squads and almost provided Turkey with an excuse to launch a fill scale invasion of Kurdish territory.
Also, Turkey is almost 100% Sunni, with no love for Syria's Alawite/Shi'ite ruling minority under Assad, so Turkey can kill two birds with one stone by using the rebels to foment the toppling of Assad, AND putting an end to Kurdish aspirations.
The West is right to be sceptical about Assad, he has a track record as an unmitigated bastard, but we should be acting on unsubstantiated Turkish claims of Syrian aggression. It would suit the current Turkish regime to get rid of Assad and see the western powers install in Syria a Sunni-dominated government hostile to the Kurds.
But given Turkey's status as a valued member of Nato, the alliance would not be able to remain on the sidelines for long if the border skirmishes escalated into all-out war. So what might the agenda be and is the scenario now playing out part of a long term plan?
Here's all the proof you need this has been planned since well before 2007, straight from the Horse's mouth.
Â
General Wesley Clark, former head of Nato telling us they plan to take down 7 countries in five years.
There's criminal conspiracy right there and for the benefit of those innocents who believe the government is their best friend and there are no conspiracies, only tin foil hat wearers I have linked the full search results so numerous sources are available.
Our political elites are murderers and criminals need arresting and putting on trial, these power crazy control freaks are a threat to us all.
RELATED POSTS:
How Close Are We To World War Three
Songs Of Glory (poem)
Has Everybody Forgotten Obama's War
The American military machine has just chalked up the grim statistic of its 2,000th fatality since America troops first surged into Afganistan to defeat "insurgents" whose families had lived in that country for many generations. The invasion was justifed in the aftermath of September 11 by the myth that Afghanistan was a ...
Ignore The warmongering Left's Calls For Intervention In Syria
Morons to the right of me, idiots to the left. What are us libertarians to do as we find ourselves in our customary position, clinging to a raft of common sense as we try to navigate a course through a sea of insanity. My stance on the trouble spots of the middle east has always been the same, firmly non interventionist and I am not shifting as the propaganda ...
Obama Talks The Talk But Dare Not Visit Afghanistan In Daylight
Todays mainstream news papers and broadcast bulletins are full of the Superhero Barack Obama's daredevil visit to Afghanistan. The man who liberated Libya single handed and took out Osama Bin Laden (or a Pakistani pensioner with a beard) in a daring solo raid behind enemy lines stormed into the Afghan capital, Kabul, made a speech that left hundreds of Taliban fighters dead and saw others fleeing for the mountains with their arses on fire then left again all in the space of ...
Argentina's Lightweight Government Throws Its Weight About
The government of Argentina, still deluding itself that the Falkland Islands belong to them, has threatened to press criminal and civil charges on British oil companies exploring off the Falkland Islands if they do not "justify their actions" by a May 2 deadline. In its latest display of megalomaniacal lunacy over the disputed islands, The Government of Argentina said it had ...
UN Panel Says Redesign The World Economy For Sustainability
Politicians can phrase their press communiques in fine words and soaring rhetoric but in the end they cannot disguise the fact that their latest initiatives on saving civilizartion are just another thinly disguised move towards global government, a global economy and culture the suppression of the individual and a New World Order.
Â
recommend
Facebook
Twitter
bookmark 
print
Comments: 23
Our political elites are murderers and criminals need arresting and putting on trial, these power crazy control freaks are a threat to us all.
Of course Ian and the first one in line has to be slime ball Blair. That megalomaniac has whole weight of the Iraq deaths on his head our soldiers and the deaths of the Iraq people. I have often wondered if Blair had told Bush to go stuff himself the whole affair would have fizzled out as we were the only country to side with him.
As for Turkey and Syria, the rebels are not like the ones in Libya where they had the full backing and we went in to help them they are finding it far more difficult to deal with the regime. You see Ian we went in under the disguise of helping our own people who were working in the Oil Fields British, French, Americans Italians, we all went in and once in we stayed.
In Syria its a different story we cant use that excuse so we use a different way to get our hands on Syria. And its imperative that we do get our hands on Syria because Syria is the last jigsaw piece that we must have in place before Iran can be dealt with.
Militarily speaking that is.
The reason Russia and China have taken a hard line on Syria is they are sure the west deceived them by using a UN resolution providing for humanitarian aid as an excuse for a war of regime change.
That Russia and China now have a score to settle is one of the things making the current situation so dangerous.
The wild card is we do not know what defence pacts Russia and China have with Syria. What we do know is that Russia has a naval base at Tartus which is their only naval base in the Mediterranean. They are not likely to give up such a strategically important site willingly.
I don't think this will come to armed conflict, more likely the standoff will herald a return to cold war conditions.
I would expect that once Syria falls to the rebels and it will be it next week or next year Russia will have to abandon Tartus a good inkling for when Syria is about to fall to the rebels will be the movement of all Russian naval personal and all shipping from that port.
I am saying this as I cant see how Russia can maintain its Tartus base when Syria falls to a pro western government and it will be useless to them as it can only maintain I think four medium warships and no large warship can dock there.
As I said above the noose is tightening on Iran and Syria is the last piece in the jigsaw we will have bases from the down in the Gulf of Aden to right up to the North in Syria and Turkey. One wrong move by anyone especially the Israelis and we can kiss goodby to what we all know, it will make Iraq, Afghanistan look like a Sunday school picnic with the schoolkids chucking tea and scones at each other.
The EU branch of the New World Order has been pushing to bring Turkey into full membership for years and has recently been supported by Obama. Only the certain knowledge that such a move would lead to the election of nationalist governments in Germany and probably several other nations has stopped it happening.
Including Turkey, a nation of 100 million mostly poor, uneducated Muslims would irrevocably change the economic and political balance of the EU and the developed world as a whole.
The push to an extended Europe does not end there however. The Turkey plan is stage one of a project to expand further, incorporating Syria, Lebanon, Israel (I can imagine their reaction) Egypt, Libya and nations along the southern Mediterranean coast into the "baltic and Mediterranean Union stretching from the Acrtic to the Sahara.
People will say I am a conspiracy theorist but the page I link provides an extensive list of links to EU Commission and European Parliament documents, transcripts of speeches to the UN and as G20 conferences and in papers published by development agencies.
We are at war with a global elite.
In particular I think, there are what they call "scaler weapons", which is what the "star wars" programs were, I believe, actually about (not missiles and the like). I believe the Russians got a big jump in that realm (during our moon mission phase of the techno-arms race) and the strategic defense boys have been playing catch up, more or less ever since. That faction is not psychopathic, I don't believe, and is under tremendous pressure to maintain a plausible defense/deterrent counter attack capability, in the face of what may very well be the power to launch a successful first strike, that would leave us both physically decimated, and "neutered" strategically speaking.
This, of course, against a backdrop of global "mafias" fighting for dominance in their psychopathic stupor, some of whom I suspect are actually trying to trigger a major conflict that would speed up "depopulation" and deindustrialization and destabilization and so forth, paving the way for the global "feudal system" so irresistible to the empathy challenged "elite" criminal class. I suspect that "serious" military faction I spoke of, is trying to "get inside" the strategic scalar weapon defensive "shield" capabilities of the Russians, essentially, which is being exploited in various ways by the "Cui Bono" types you spoke of.
PS~ None of that is to say the Russians are in any less a conflicted state, with rogue elements doing their psychopathic things, despite what I believe is an "official" Government that by in large does not want " to go there" . . I suspect the tension on high is thick enough to cut with a knife, so to speak, right now.
I posted an article some time ago on scalar wave technology but did not bring it here because I could not be bothered arguing with the Scienceologists who were certain to shout "Conspiracy Theorist". Maybe I should rethink that decision.
The problem we have now is that since WW2 there has been a lot of progress on such weapons (you mentioned "star wars") but no global conflict large enough to let us see who has what. There were rumours at the time of the fist Gulf War that Saddam had or was developing such weapons but those were ludicrously inflated to strengthen the case for going to war.
Thus nobody on either side really knows the other lot's capabilities. Which is why I think a return to the cold war is most likely, in fact I think such a conflict is going on now and is manifested in the cyber attacks western nations are subjected to daily.
The mutually assured destruction (MAD) logos, renders it absolutely vital that "we" retain a significant assurance in the minds of "them", that they will surely be destroyed if they launched even the very best first strike they could coordinate in advance. Significant defensive capabilities being developed creates the potential that one player in the game will believe that they can cripple their opponent to the point where their own defenses could thwart a limited response . . And in that game, the logic says to pull the trigger at that point, unfortunately.
And something to bear in mind I feel, is that for those strategic defense guys, the responsibility they have to maintain that dark deterrence never goes away. Even if the political arena is a pathological freak show, they have to make damn sure the Russians know "we" can crush them back . . .
I put the likelihood of an imminent nuclear exchange fairly low, in my thinking anyway . . I don't know what the actual likelihood might be, but don't seem to have much fear about it, for what that's worth ; )
Still though, that game can drive policy, I believe.
The balance of fear remains as a constraint on East and West which is why I foresee a push towards a proxy war fought with conventional weapons in the middle east. If the west's team wins we have friedly powers controlling land from the Altlantic to the Pacific and thus have Russia and China surrounded.
If the east wins, Russia gets access to the Mediterranean and Indian Ocean and China consolidates its position as the eastern hemipshere's major power.
" . . and thus have Russia and China surrounded"
Yes, and it's the nature of the scaler weapons which makes that so vital, I believe, from the perspective of our strategic defense guys. ICBMs are in "flight" for quite a while (by computer standards) and there is time to locate and disable them, I strongly suspect, with those energy projection weapons. Having a multitude of bases near the potential targets, that could launch many low flying cruise missiles from many directions simultaneously, presents a tactical problem that counterbalances the theoretical "negation" of our ICBMs, and I believe that is why the surround up close strategy has become the linchpin of our MAD policy for several decades now.
And, beneath that "umbrella" of vital security interest, the psychos can operate in relative secrecy, I believe, and justify all sorts of shenanigans that benefit them in various ways. That's the 400 pound gorilla I suspect, that makes all the monkey business so much easier to justify within the military industrial complex, and keep relatively hidden from us pleabs.
Invisible Empire A New World Order Defined
.
Anyway, many years ago now, I have read much from the mentioned authors and have a background understanding of it all, as well as a strong belief that it is most all potentially true, at least based upon factual truths in essence.
There is so much about our reality that we do not know and will probably never know ... our very thinking has been "boxed in" by the "powers that be" to the degree that most folks will completely deny the truth of it because it is "so far out" for them.
It is beginning to strike me how so many otherwise extremely intelligent folks can claim to believe the words of the Bible as being un-assailable yet they will avidly deny the possibilities suggested in this above link ... it just doesn't make any sense ... other than ego gratification.
IMnsHO and E.
There were certain things on that page I found suspect (mind control for example) but I decided to link the whole thing rather than cherry picking bits that supported my case.
Most of it however is well know and has been in the public domain for many years. And as you say most of the documents the page links are authored or part authored by people whose names are highly respected in their field.
I first came across scalar wave technologies while working for an atomic energy research agency in the 1980s. We in the computer department were not directly involved but the engineers and physicists loved to talk about such stuff, partly I thing to see the incredulous looks on the faces of us non - experts when they invited us to the R&D labs and gave demonstrations.