Kate Gosselin Might Be Target of More Hate from Jon Gosselin's Author Friend

Kimberly, have you read the book? It does not sound like it based on your comments. I urge you to read it before you write these articles. The book is documented proof of Kate's lies, abuse, manipulation, scamming. The contents are filled with notes and journals written by Kate herself. The book literally made me sick...it is not pleasant reading. You will be shocked and your heart will ache for those precious children and how badly they have been / are being mistreated by their mother. Hoffman is a hero in my opinion for having the courage to bring out the truth about Kate. No one else has done it because too much money was always at stake. He is not famous or rich like Kate so sadly he will be portrayed as the bad guy while Kate, the real villian, will remain unscathed. What a tragedy that would be. Also, no one has filed a libel suit. The book was pulled by TLC because of possible copyright issues. Hoffman is donating proceeds to a child protection group. As far as Jon knowing, I believe he did but a lot of the abuse happened when he was not home. He had no choice but to endure it because Kate's rage was too powerful. Kimberly, please use common sense right now. I know it's your job to post articles, but abuse is not something to question. People who report abuse should be respected and honored, and they should be believed.

Once again, you are trying to deflect to Jon. Since when are Kreider's own words about Roberts hate? Are we to sweep this under the rug? How are her own words 'allegations'? Note the lack of libel as a cause of the cease and desist order.

I find it quite interesting that you use the term "hateful accusations". Why not just say "accusations"?
Would you use the term "hateful accusations" with regards to a suspected child molester?
I don't believe that you know what you are talking about and never watched the show.
Because those of us who have are not surprised by any of this.
Anyone with working knowledge of how and why abuse occurs knows that there is often an escalation.
One minute Kate is screaming at toddlers for a missing dresser knob. On camera. Or a wad of gum (where she also took a family member who was doing her a favor to task) Screaming again. On camera. She screamed at her nanny. On camera. Her husband. On camera. The only one who she didn't scream at was Maddy (who quite frankly, needed it).
It's not a far reach to assume that she would abuse them for eating an M&M.
She doesn't carry a wooden spoon in the car because she is going to be mixing brownie batter while driving.
It's there for intimidation. And because she might need to use it on them.

your supposed to stay neutral in writing stories there man hater

Kimberly, if you have a Kindle, I can loan it to you via email. It's been an enlightening read because Hoffman is letting the recovered emails and other documents do the "talking" for him. Not a lot of unnecessary narrative or exposition.
Years ago I witnessed physical child abuse. I reported it. The child was taken from the daycare. The child was returned to the parents within hours because the examiner couldn't find substantive evidence. The child was a 3 YO with fetal alcohol syndrome so she couldn't express herself verbally as well as even other 3 YOs, and her bruises were written off because she was 'clumsy'(FAS again). I lost faith in the system that day and believe that for every child it helps, there are at least two it fails. Or in this case, 8.
Discovery and its arsenal of power chose to back Kate early in the game. No one stood a chance against them.