Photos of George Bush

Disrespect is not an admirable trait. Â This is for those with a short memory. President Bush was portrayed as Hitler, a Nazi, hung in effigy and portrayed as a monkey numerous times. Â That does not mean it is "ok" if someone does the same to our current president, but hopefully it puts things into a bit of perspective. Politics can be an ugly business. Â I submit that we stop pointing fingers and start standing for our beliefs.

Comments: 13

les f. Jun 25, 2012, 3:28am UTC

Yeah, if you had juxtaposed Obamas' face on those pics there'd be hell to pay, I'm sure.

That "First Bush was Hitler, then Obama was Hitler." was a small oasis in that desert of ignorance.

Romney will win, unless Obama can scare up a vid of him in sexual congress with a goat, the economy is just too bad. As vicious as the campaign is going to be, though, it's hard to believe there won't be long lasting scars on the American psyche. They'll be calling each other cannibals by the time this is over.

You ever sleep?

Renee Nal Jun 25, 2012, 3:31am UTC

lol ;-)

Renee Nal Jun 25, 2012, 3:31am UTC

haha Les, I could ask you the same question ;-)

''The One & Only BERF .. Jun 25, 2012, 3:32am UTC

"First Bush was Hitler, then Obama was Hitler."

I thought O was the antiChrist..........

reply to this comment

Betty S. Jun 25, 2012, 4:39am UTC

Yes Berf.. I agree with you.. I thought he was anti Christ too and still not convinced he's not or at least a fore runner.I've been afraid of Donald Trump too.

reply to this comment

Opinion Nate Ted Jun 25, 2012, 7:24am UTC

Wow Renee, quite the collection. I've never seen so many before. Since Bush is white, he's fair game, and since Obama is 1/2 black, his white gets a free pass. So, just any blackness gets you a free ride and a "MUST respect" huh? And blackness covers up communist too. Hmm, interesting.

reply to this comment

Duane B. Jun 25, 2012, 8:45am UTC

Those who turn to personal attack, when saying one person is another incarnate or belittleing them on personal traits are admitting that their own ideas, their own experiences are so weak that they must use things others have create to bludgeon those they oppose.

Those who use personal attacks, are admitting their intellect is weak, their principles and their ethics are weak, that they don't even have 'good intentions'.

If they believe such personal attacks will succeed then they are admitting that they think the audience is low mind and weak like they are.

And each person it works on are also showing they are weak minded.

The personal attacks diminish the respect or conideration all others should give to the attacker. If it is a pattern from a group and that group does not distance themselves from the attacks and the attacker then they are lowering their standing.