Gas Prices have dropped despite President Obama's stifling regulations as OPEC has increased production, concerned that without supply, demand would dwindle. Additionally, poor economic news in America and Europe has pushed prices lower for several weeks.
"In an attempt to bring down oil prices that had edged toward $130 earlier this year, OPEC has been pumping like mad, increasing production by about 2.3 million barrels per day." Less supply means higher pain at the pumps. Currently, the price of gas is highest on the west coast, as they "continue to struggle with ramping up production, resulting in a 33 percent drop in supplies from year-ago levels."
The annual report from the Institute for Energy Research states, "At current consumption rates, the United States has enough oil to last into the 23rd century without ever importing a single drop of oil from another country." Some astounding claims are made in this report, such as, "Overall, the United States is sitting on approximately 1.442 trillion barrels of recoverable oil deposits," which contradicts the president's claim that "With only 2 percent of the world's oil reserves, we can't just drill our way to lower gas prices."
Encouraging fuel efficient alternatives is a good thing. However, manipulating Americans by forcing them to pay more for gas is not the solution.
President Obama: The Green Agenda
President Obama, who has made it known that his goal from the beginning was to decrease the use of fossil fuels by increasing the price of gas, is getting his wish, as less Americans are driving. He has stated that although he would have preferred the price of gas to rise more "gradually," ultimately high gas prices will force Americans to lower consumption and buy more fuel efficient cars. He believes that the key is the automobile industry, and his touting of the failed Chevy Volt. He has balked at GOP arguments that "oil prices would be lower if his administration had allowed more drilling" and has mocked those who disagree as "flat-earthers."
Energy Secretary Steven Chu was quoted in the Wall Street Journal in 2008, "Mr. Chu has called for gradually ramping up gasoline taxes over 15 years to coax consumers into buying more-efficient cars and living in neighborhoods closer to work." At a Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing in March, Senator Mike Lee (R-Ut.) challenged Chu on his statements about the benefits of the high cost of fuel. He asked Chu, "So are you saying you no longer share the view that we need to figure out how to boost gasoline prices in America?" Chu responded, "I no longer share that view." The Obama-Appointed Energy Secretary has done a complete flip flop on his position.
In a time of particular economic insecurity, the cost of oil is a huge factor if Americans want food on their tables, heat in their homes and a roof over their heads. Innovative solutions and entrepreneurial spirit of Americans is being stifled and it is the key of getting America back on track.
Watch the President discuss his preference for a "gradual" increase in fuel prices in 2008.
*Photo Credit: Ben Powless









Comments: 28
@Renee: I think Opinion Nate Ted is right, those on Gather who vote Democratically do understand what Obama is about. The reason they don't just say it, in my opinion, is that they know the Americans who don't agree with those Obama positions must be manipulated to believe the policies aren't what they really are in order to give him their vote again in November--or for the first time.
If Obama came right out and said he wanted to dismantle America as it has always been known, downgrade its credit, economy and ability to discover and sustain its own energy sources--making it dependent upon other countries, who would vote for him? He can't tell Americans he hopes to one day realize the total annihilation of America as we know it, including its very freedoms enjoyed.
His wife, however, let that cat out of the bag prior to his getting the White House seat the first time, remember? She admitted she detested this country, essentially, saying she was finally proud of it when Americans made a move she applauded. Notice a muzzle got put on her to keep her from ruining his chances in '08.
That's why you don't hear liberals on this site admitting what they know is true about the Obama policies. They want people to be fooled until he gets four more years in office. Once he does, he can do anything, since he doesn't have to worry about getting re-elected again. That's the greatest danger for America--obama with four years of no restraint and no need to play nice or keep up the facade for the voters.
The American public is being played.
That we have to suffer along with those fools is what get's my quills up...
Once someone gets on their high horse and proclaims they are the one who can fix the country's ills then people expect them to put their money where their mouth is, as the old toothpaste commercial used to say.
Obama must take his lumps of coal with his self-congratulating bows. Unfortunately, and unlike you, I'm not seeing he has had "anything go right for the country" since he took office.
As far as taking credit for lowered gas prices... my question would be, well How low can you get them to go? Because a Huge one or two dollar per gallon dip would greatly impress me. I don't think it's going to happen. Ah, the good old days when you didn't have to take out a loan to fill your vehicle.
1 liter of oil in a combustion engine creates energy equal to 25000 man hours of labor. The dollar will eventually be pegged to oil. It is now unofficially anyway, and it's the only worthwhile commodity that exists in the abundance necessary to cover those T - bills.
Our economic policy could have been created in a lunatic asylum.