The search for Caleigh Harrison has reportedly been terminated after divers had spent several days searching approximately five square miles of ocean. The little girl vanished a week ago in a case that has been rather suspicious from the beginning. With there being no sign of the girl, what are detectives' next moves? Is this simply the end of the search or are they moving on to investigating new theories in her disappearance?
With it being a week since Caleigh Harrison vanished, there are plenty of questions regarding the finer details of her disappearance. With police spending so much time searching the ocean, have they bothered with other avenues? The following list of questions should be considered by law enforcement if they haven't considered it already. If these things have been investigated, shouldn't detectives at least address the media?
- Has Allison Hammond (the mother of the missing child) taken a polygraph test?
- Have investigators searched the home of the missing tot?
- Have investigators examined the vehicle or vehicles belonging to Allison Hammond and Anthony Harrison?
- Have scent or cadaver dogs been used in the search?
It's interesting that no details like these have risen in the search for Caleigh Harrison, but perhaps detectives will address these concerns soon. It's just a shame that this child is missing under such strange circumstances. It's highly likely that the little girl was pulled out to sea, but detectives have apparently abandoned this theory for the time being. What needs to be done next is to tackle both an abduction and foul play theory to get to the bottom of this.
Crime analyst and profiler Chelsea Hoffman can be found on The Huffington Post, Chelsea Hoffman: Case to Case and many other outlets. Follow @TheRealChelseaH on Twitter or click here to contact Chelsea directly.







Comments: 44
These questions are not to cast aspersions on an individual. These questions are in reference to a defenseless child being left in an offensive environmental situation. A situation that, even to an untrained eye, held a probability of danger that warranted having the ability to defend.
There are too many 'Whys' to turn a blind eye.
P.s. sometimes polygraphs are in fact admissible in court depending on the circumstances. However, it's not to indicate guilt or anything, but it is to show the investigative process if one is used.
Polygraph tests are standard in law enforcement to help in guiding them in the directions they need to go in their search for clues. I.e. Deborah Bradley failed a polygraph test when baby Lisa vanished. After that, she nearly cracked like an egg which led to the search warrant of her home, which led to the cadaver dog 'hitting' on the scent of human skin oils and cells indicative of decomposition post mortem on several items.
Still haven't gotten anywhere in the case but this much is known thanks to the polygraph.
Police dogs were used in the search in the very first day, within hours...that's been reported on EXTENSIVELY in every major local news outlet, since the story was first reported. They even put the dogs on rafts and boats to help search the rocky outcroppings where they think the tidal current would have gone.
And state police interviewed the small amount of witnesses on the beach that day, including 4 or 5 people specifically who were in the vicinity of Caleigh Harrison--asking if they saw ANYONE ELSE. Again, this has already reported on EXTENSIVELY in our local news. The children were seen on the beach that day with the mom. The problem is that no one saw what might have happened during the span of time when she disappeared.
Again, I've said before this is not a cove or inlet type of beach. Long Beach goes out straight to wide Atlantic. The National Weather Service issued dangerous surf warnings that day in this area where the riptide current and undertow is already notoriously strong. I would think it would be better worth some time to gain an understanding of how the ocean actually works than try to come up with all these unfounded conspiracy theories.
((Also had to add something about that a comment elsewhere about--*gasp*--the mom actually working AT A BAR.
Like that somehow makes her a suspicious character really provides me with a lot of insite into some of the mindpower at work here!! Heh. Yeah, because it's so rare that employment in the bar and restaurant trade happens in coastal tourist communities...or that myself and half my neighbors haven't worked in similar north shore establishments over the years...since there are hundreds of them and they are a huge part of the local; economy...no, it MUST mean the mom is a drunk(?!) or had something to do with it, right? Mon dieu... ))
I'm sorry for that. :( It must be totally tough.
I'm sorry that I can't relate to this type of behavior though.
Again -- keep in mind that there are too many varying reports to simply take all information from them. Simply asking the questions in hopes of a definitive and concrete answer is the responsibility of anyone who doesn't want to solely rely on the varied/conflicting reports in the news. That's why they're questions and not statements.
Again, try to chill/relax a little. You don't have to give yourself an aneurysm over every other little differing thought from your own ;)
I appreciate that you're a reader and all, but you really need to realize that if you don't like what you're reading, you don't have to read it. Nobody is forcing you. And if you don't realize by now that the 1000+ articles about this case are full of contradictions, then you should probably go back and read each and every single one like you're expecting me to do (and I'm not claiming to have done, but I've read plenty and continue to every single day.)
I would be a little ashamed of myself to demand that someone I don't know write only what is being conflicted in Google News without asking any questions. I'd feel a little low if I behaved like that with people who are actually doing a service as an advocate for the MISSING and not those connected to the case or those who demand to be entertained or impressed in the public.
When a child goes missing, and one makes a commitment to that child to assist in locating her, then what one thinks/believes is irrelevant. The No Stone Unturned didn't start with Caleigh, or any recent incident, it has been a long held hope for the loved ones of the missing. They need the public's help to turn those stones.
So, unless someone can convey with 100% certainty what happened to Caleigh....no one should keyhole theories and expect others to accept defeat. It is a friggin week+1 day.....without 100% certainty as to what happened to the child, it is far to early to give up on Caleigh.
But you're so right on the rest of your post.
We're not supposed to just look at one theory and be like "yup, that must be it."
That's not science.
http://www.chelseahoffman.com/2012/04/who-would-abduct-caleigh-harrison.html
I did this up a few days ago too to consider how likely an abduction would be. It's not really *that* likely.
These questions are ones I would really like answered:
- Has Allison Hammond (the mother of the missing child) taken a polygraph test?
- Have investigators searched the home of the missing tot?
- Have investigators examined the vehicle or vehicles belonging to Allison Hammond and Anthony Harrison?
In other cases, these type of questions are standard -- but for some reason, this case is a very touchy subject. Please keep asking these questions, Chelsea, DESPITE THE SNIDE AND UNHELPFUL CRITICISM.
It would be standard detective/LE work to search the home, all the vehicles, areas near the places of work, etc etc.
Thanks again for your good work. I am not sure why nobody else is asking the questions you are... so it is appreciated.
I'm just one person. I don't have a team of researchers and the like to assist me like the mainstream people do. So I do what I can.
People like Chris either have stakes in this case or simply don't get these types of things.
and she could have developmental disabilities. We just don't know.
http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news/30959133/detail.html#ixzz1tINeh2Tx
The narrowed eyes indicate frustration.
The look together appears rather smug, but it could be frustration and anger.
As an interesting aside, I read an article recently (link below) about a study done on murderers who claimed their loved one was "missing" when really they had kiled them. It said:
"Researchers watched videotaped facial actions of 52 people who made televised pleas for the safe return of a missing relative. Half of the pleas were from deceptive individuals who were later convicted of murdering their loved one.
Coders analysed more than 23,000 frames of video from real cases in the US, Canada, Australia, and the UK. They compared the facial actions of 26 genuine pleaders to those of 26 liars. ...
The study said: ‘During the critical lie, told by each deceptive murderer, upper face surprise and lower face happiness were likely to be expressed, attributed to the failed attempt to appear sad and leakage of happiness.
It added: 'Deception - a fundamental aspect of human communication - often is accompanied by the simulation of unfelt emotions or the concealment of genuine emotions to correspond to the false message...
'Given limited cognitive resources and the difficulty of necessary multi-tasking during deception, we suggest that emotional leakage is particularly likely to occur when the lie is complex and/or associated with strong emotions to be concealed or falsified.'"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2124878/The-4-upper-face-muscles-game-away-lying-murderers.html#ixzz1tIj1046W
The photo at the link in August Lady's comment was from the press conference the family gave on Wednesday (I believe, too tired to check). My immediate reaction to Allison at that time was 'She knows something/Caleigh is alive.'. Tried to avoid thinking on it for how many theories can one float?
Came back on this site this evening to find comments expressing opinions re Allison's expressions etc.
Then put Caleigh's name for a Google search and the first thing up was this....
http://empathysinsights.blogspot.com/2012/04/caleigh-harrison.html
So based on the 3 philosophy, will float this theory. The abduction was planned, Allison involved, and Caleigh is alive.
Sounds like you know info that the public doesn't. I hope Allison has already taken a polygraph -- if she hasn't, I think it is a good idea to prove she was not involved... because then police can make sure their efforts are directed in the ways most likely to bring Caleigh home. Law enforcement says they have NOT ruled out foul play, but they think a stranger abduction is highly unlikely -- which makes it sound like they have not cleared Allison of involvement. It would be great if they could at least rule out mom as a suspect.
My questions -
where does that leave a mother?
Where do you even start looking yourself?
When do you resume daily life and work without being criticized?
This is where frustration and anger set in. You want so bad to help police and think they know what they are doing and hoping they are right. But now you think what if they were wrong? To many what ifs here.
Robyn A, also appreciate your calm tone.
My belief on missing persons, children especially, is simple....bring them home. Best way to bring them home is publicity. The majority of found missing persons are not found by law enforcement, they are found by members of the public. This is not say LE isn't doing their job, just that there are more public eyes than there are LE eyes. Fliers keep up awareness. As does speculation.