Turnabout is fair play. Limbaugh got hammered for weeks until the left was able to find something else to focus on. He's just returning the favor:
Appearing on David Letterman’s show last night, Olbermann described himself as a “$10 million chandelier†which Current TV couldn’t do justice to because it “didn’t have a house to put [Olbermann] in.†Limbaugh, in classic ironic mode, took Olbermann’s metaphor and twisted it into an insult.
“You’re not a $10 million chandelier,†Limbaugh laughed, addressing Olbermann, “you’re the guy sitting in the corner of the room wearing a $50 lamp shade.â€
‘50 Dollar Lampshade Man’: Limbaugh Mocks Olbermann’s Appearance on Letterman
recommend
Facebook
Twitter
bookmark 
print
Comments: 25
Great visual, Larry............
Rush has a large audience and a daily show of several hours. He is free to say whatever he likes. Do his targets have similar opportunities to rebut the statements of Rush? I think not. Now if one is a politician, that's part of the job. But if one is an ordinary citizen, its not whether one is an "activist" or not. One could call you an activist based on the number of political posts I see under your name. But it would be grossly unfair for Rush to attack you on his show.
Not everyone who is 30 as they finish their law degree has been spending all their time on sex. Also, to get into a good law school and stay there takes quite a lot of work. You don't really have much time for much besides studying. If you don't believe me, talk to your lawyer.
So I would suggest that your statements show great ignorance on your part and a really mean mind when it comes to those who don't agree with your politics. Do I make my self clear? Or are you just being a ditto-head for Rush?
My daughter graduated with a masters when she was 27, even taking a year off to travel to Europe.
Fluke was not the 'college kid' they passed her off as. She's an activist who rallied to have federal funding for transgender surgery. Oh, wait, I already said that.
Do I make my self clear?
Who do YOU think you're speaking to?
I only have your words to go by. Who am I writing too?
What's an "activist"? Perhaps you have some special definition. Wikipedia has "activism" as being "Activism consists of intentional efforts to promote, impede or direct social, political, economic, or environmental change." So an activist would be someone who intentionally attempts to promote, impede, or direct social, political, economic, or environmental change. That makes George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, and Glen Beck activists by that definition. Is your definition different?
Does anyone who disagrees with you deserve to be grossly insulted to a national audience?
If you have not heard by now that Sandra Fluke is, indded, an activist, self-avowed activist, by the way, there's probably nothing else to discuss.
What's an "activist." I gave you the meaning for the term as used on Wikipedia. You did not respond to that. Just what do you think an "activist" is. You seem to feel that anyone who is an activist is fair game.
You are using the term "activist" as a justification for abusing Fluke. Now tell me what you think an activist is. What warrants this abuse by Rush and you?
So far you have failed repeatedly to say what an activist is.
Sandra Fluke: A Fake Victim of Georgetown’s Policy on Contraceptives?
I provided the definition from Wikipedia and suggested that by that definition the Founding Fathers were activists. I then asked for your definition. Do you have a definition of this term as you use it? Or is it just a term for a sincere American patriot attempting to make America better for all of us? Because if it is the latter, you and Rush are insulting the Founding Fathers and sincere American patriots.
Even if she really was just an innocent student at Georgetown, you have to ask yourself why she would choose to attend a Catholic University when she knew their core beliefs go against the idea of birth control.