http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/28/opinion/burton-florida-gates/index.html?hpt=hp_t2
I think it's worth exploring the concept that Gated Communities may not be a fantastic way for people to live, in light of the Trayvon Martin killing. Sometimes fear can take you to a bad place. My guess would be that an un-gated neighborhood with an active (and unarmed) neighborhood watch would end up with less crime than a community in which residents leave their doors unlocked and their alarms off, counting on the guard house at the entrance to keep out the evil folk.
By the way, if anyone still wonders why Trayvon Martin was in that Gated community in the first place, he was visiting someone there who was a resident: his dad's fiancee.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/27/justice/florida-teen-shooting-witnesses/index.html









Comments: 8
2. I much prefer, an un-gated neighborhood with an active (and unarmed) neighborhood watch. It is actually much safer.
3. I was wondering why he was there. The news reports I get did not say.
2. Agree
3. I did see mention of it early on, but it was soon forgotten.
The whole idea of gated communities has never been one I liked very much. I've never lived in one, and never wanted to. But I've lived in apartment complexes that was fenced and gated, and in apartment buildings where residents had to "buzz in" visitors. None of them could've been considered "havens of prestige", and none of them were about excluding minorities (in several instances, I was, as a white male, in the minority myself).
I don't think it's so much about the gates, or of Neighborhood Watch groups (which I've always thought of as a bit creepy), but about some bigger issues (some of which several commenters have already mentioned) that they point to.
The idea turns me off with a mixture of feelings inside. But they're great for those that feel safer.