[OPINION] Are you convinced that politicians are fighting an admirable battle for your rights to birth control? Hold that thought a moment -- did you know ...
"When Obama enacted his 'health care reform,' he mandated that maternity coverage not be available to any private insurance company.†[Abby Johnson, a Planned Parenthood employee]
Why would Obama want to make sure women incurred huge financial harships associated with giving birth, but they be guaranteed free access to contraceptives that prevent birth? Do you think denying that critical scope of women's health care might have anything to do with birth control?
(Update: Is Internet access being cleansed again? If the online links within this article do not work, click the Jaffe Memo image at the very bottom to enlarge; and/or try copying & pasting the URLs below into your browser.)
Abby Johnson was a Planned Parenthood employee. She refers to a highly secretive "Jaffe Memo" that Planned Parenthood developed 40-years ago:
Source: "A Family Planning Perspectives, Special Supplement" published by Planned Parenthood-World Population, NYC, NY, 19.70."
 Ms Johnson goes on to say:Â
When I worked at Planned Parenthood, there was something that we were not allowed to talk about. If we didn’t talk about it, then maybe no one else would either. It was called the Jaffe Memo. In 1969, Planned Parenthood was asked by the government to produce some ideas to help with overpopulation. They did just that. What is in the memo as a “solution†to overpopulation is astonishing. And, I’m sorry to say, it looks like the Jaffe Memo is starting to show its face in our culture.
It is alarming to compare the Planned Parenthood Jaffe Memo to Communist Goals that were read into our 1963 Congressional Record. Forty-five Communist Goals were developed by FBI Agent Cleon Skousen, who studied and spoke on Communism as authorized by J. Edgar Hoover.
Note Planned Parenthood's proposed "Social Constriants" column, to the far left on the Jaffe Memo.
1. Restructure family:
a) Postpone or avoid marriage
b) Alter image of ideal family size
2. Compulsory education of children
3. Encourage increased homosexuality
4. Educate for family limitation
5. Fertility control agents in water supply
6. Encourage women to work
Â
These are some of the Communist Goals read into our Congressional Record only a few years before the Jaffe Memo [paraphrased]:
24) Eliminate laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.
25) Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography, and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio and TV.
26) Present Homosexuality, degeneracy, and promiscuity as "normal, natural, and healthy".
40) Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.
41) Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute problems of children to suppressive influence of parents.
Â
So far we've just addressed the first column of the Planned Parenthood Memo. Be sure to read its "Economic Deterrents" and "Social Control" columns. Compare them to the rest of the Communist Goals. And remember, the Communist Goals came first. If this doesn't offend you, tell your husbands about all of the tax deductions that politicians have taken away, cited on the Jaffe Memo, so you wont be able to afford children.
This is frightening stuff, ladies. Isn't it pleasant to know that men in government have plotted for years to "socially control" you with birth control? And today they're disguising that as "helping" you? And they're blaming others, using your 'rights' to do it, so you won't look at what they're really doing? Are women that dumb? Obviously politicians and organizations the likes of Planned Parenthood believe so.
As you digest this information, don't forget the role that our mainstream "news" media has knowingly played, in propagandizing how you think of your American Liberties. The media still is and will be doing a lot more of that as Obama's election nears.
Â
You may recall Obama's Regulation Czar, Cass Sunstein. Sunstein is this administration's proponent of "eugenics." Below is an excerpted definition of eugenics from the New World Encyclopedia. I included its historial definition because this Memo goes back to 1969.
Remember, too, nice sounding words are what Progressives use to convince you they have only your best interest at heart. The real question is just "who" decides what is best for you? Are you willing to hand over your Creator-bestowed rights, provided in our U.S. Constitution, to a government?
For example in the definition below, "lessen human suffering" could just as easily mean putting someone out of their suffering ("death panels") as what you would typically think those words mean.
Eugenics is a social philosophy that pushes for improvement of human hereditary traits. It uses forms of intervention that supposedly create healthier, more intelligent people, to save society's resources, and to lessen human suffering.
Historically, eugenics has been used as a justification for coercive state-sponsored discrimination and human rights violations, such as forced sterilization of persons with genetic defects, the killing of the institutionalized and, in some cases, genocide of races perceived as inferior.
Ms Johnson forewarns of Planned Parenthood's Jaffe Memo ...
This memo was put out just over 50 years after the first Planned Parenthood clinic was opened. We are now a little over 40 years out from the publication of this memo. Look what has happened in those 90 years. Abortion has been made legal and continued to increase. Planned Parenthood is a non-profit giant in this country (and others)…just last year they grossed 1 billion dollars in revenue. They are pushing for no restrictions on birth control and abortion. And guess who is right alongside them leading the charge? Our Commander in Chief, Barack Obama.
Don’t be naïve. This memo is still Planned Parenthood’s ultimate desire. Abortion and contraceptives on demand…that is their goal. They will do anything to make it happen…including coercion, breaking the law, underhanded deals, and dirty politics.
Â
Read Abby Johnson's complete article here.
http://www.lifenews.com/2011/11/28/secret-planned-parenthood-memo-stop-maternity-coverage/
Â
Click here for Jaffe Memo online or click image below to enlarge.
 http://www.abbyjohnson.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/jaffememo.pdf
Article courtesy of Abby Johnson, November 28, 2011
Â
 
Â
UPDATE: For more indepth Jaffe background and with permission of its author, please visit this corresponding article:
Planned Parenthood Speaker Encourages Teen Sex at Home
Â
recommend
Facebook
Twitter
bookmark 
print
Comments: 75
One Memo proposal was to slip fertilization chemicals in the water supply, throwing all of women's health caution to wind. These are the same self-righteous conspirators that fain contempt today about medical "costs" for not taking pristine care of oneself -- knowing full well they have conspired something this horrendously haphazard with our lives.
The good thing about anger is, it's a motivator :)!
I apologoze to both you and gig.
i screwed up...............
Also, I delivered my daughter, no fainting here. ; P
Please don't read your own instinctual connotations into the article's references to men, Optimus. As I've already clearly explained, that had nothing to do with men in general but it did refer to men who dominated government in making women's decisions back in the 50s-60s. Which is absolutely the case and which did make these sort of decisions all the more unacceptable.
Personally, I view men and women as filling two very distinct and different roles, but one being necessary to the other. All people are equal in my opinion. But that was not the case, according to men, throughout history and, in some respects, is still not true today (referring to how Muslims view women).
child care facilities"? This is outrageous!
That's exactly right. That is 1/2 their baby and they should fight for the child. So what if it's in her body. She knew that before she had sex. And she still accepted the fun knowing it might end up with her carrying another persons baby also.
Men should demand their child not be killed and agree to take the child off her hands when it is born.
I don't excuse them cowering behind behind an immoral law that says the woman can kill his child if she wants to.
RISE UP MEN!! Or we women will smack you around :)
It is wonderful that any woman can be a stay at home Mom. Our children thus our future will be much better blessed for it.
But there is evil threads running through out time. What kind of excites me is that those tricks on birth control never came to fruition UNTIL God was ready.
One prayer I have prayed since early on in my life. "God, please let us keep control of our children until Jesus returns."
I hope He does. I think He will :) He just needs to slap the United Nations around a little bit.
Long ago, Sandy A sent me a link to PriestsForLife.org. When my computer died and I got my laptop, I could no longer find the site and Sandy forgot which one it was she sent me that impacted me so much. This was it. There are lots of testimonies from former abortion providers. And there are pictures.
They have a campaign that says "America won't reject abortion until America sees abortion." That's true. And it's also a big reason why pro-abortion people don't want any laws that require a woman to have an ultrasound before having an abortion. Once people realize it's not a blob of goo, but a baby, it changes everything.
I can't find it now, but at that site there was a wonderful explanation about how men are not relieved of any blame with their "I'm a man and cannot comment" or 'I'm a man and cannot decide what a woman does with her body" excuses for not being against abortion. I wish I could find it again....
Anyway....I'm not surprised at the memo you mentioned. I've known about the founder of Planned Parenthood. But I have wondered how in the world they've gotten away with what they have over the years. That they have the support of communists and share their messages and methods explains a bunch.
At some point, I hope women realize how much they've been duped.
As I sit here, I realize that there must be communists within the advertising movement. Think about it. They've used capitalism to make people crave stuff so that the "it requires two working parents to support a family" mantra could come true. They've pushed credit and credit cards as a normal way of life. (Doing that also makes it easier to have a government that thrives on credit as well, since people don't know any better in their own homes.) So what children don't get aborted enter the day care system and go right into the public school system and then on to college (doesn't EVERYONE have to go to college now?) so that they're educated away from Mom and Dad by liberal/progressives from birth through college now. Is it any wonder that they end up with the "gimmees" and become Occupiers instead of TEA party members?
We've failed big time, Fren. We have failed and they've succeeded. My how they must laugh at us.
Can we take back America? We had better try.
Originally, the sign said: My uterus is private property
The photoshopped version added: However, I demand it be publicly funded. The next line was: pro-choice logic
Thank you for the link, I will check that out. That does sound interesting. I get digusted with the too-gross abortion pics, but that motto is so true. Seeing the baby does make a difference. The 180-movie made that very clear.
It is irksome how men strut around like this issue isn't their problem. It most certainly is and whether they know it or not, women DO hold them accountable for their "fair share." I think you're about my age? Think back to, literally, the man's world that our world was in the 50s-60s. Literally. That mentality is HOW things got this way.
I see the development of these things a little differently. I see the Communist Left subtly doing what they do best, wrapping things in the nice sounding words that sucked-in good trusting people. There is noting wrong with being trusting -- well, there didn't used to be. As the Communist Left gradually worked on that end, they drew like kind to themsevles, increasingly knowing and plotting until we have what we're left with today.
About the children and school systems that teach them more than parents can, a huge change today are the pre-schools. Gov't has taken over regulating those programs, too, which are full of the same propaganda our other school levels are. If I recall gov't has suggested more than once mandating pre-school, an age when parents' teachings will be very hard to intertwine.
We failed by staying silent becase we thought that was the right thing to do. By not questioning what we did not know to question. We had an invisible adversary. We won't make that mistake again!
The important thing to concentrate on now is that we do know now! We will win our country back, Marilyn. We have the Power on our side and there can be none against us :)!
My uterus is private property
However, I demand it be publicly funded.
Exactly.
Governments and/or politicians play hypocritical games with this world population issue as well, for on one hand in public they say it is a coming disaster on world resources, funding, food, you name it, "we need to do something." Great for UN stump speeches and funding. On the other hand they all count on growing populations to stimulate their economies and tax bases, import and exports, more consumers, voting blocks, and all that goes along with that. Lower your birthrate, and they just increase immigration as one way. Putin in Russia just asked people to have more babies as another. At best what they all want is increased control, nothing more in practice.
Until the last couple of years I, most Americans, regarded the U.N. a joke. I always wondered why they even kept it, it comes across as so grossly inept. Now we know why. Indeed it is for the purpose of One World Government. I was shocked to see how intricately involved the U.N. already is and has been in taking over our lands!
I hadn't heard that about Putin, lol. I'm surprised he's not insisting on fathering them all.
lets see - two tenths of one percent - .002 were referred top adoption agencies ... and 8.6% (basically 1 in 10) got pre-natal care ....................
sounds to me like their 'counseling' skills needs some improvement! hell a coin toss would get 50/50!
oh - and some experts claim flouride lowers testosterone .............
the jaffe memo, certainly is in line with sangers objectives when she founded pp - stop the reproduction of minorities and poor.
Yes, that Memo reminded me of Sanger, I considered using her photo. The Demcorats started with trying to control populations of the minorities and poor and now they've graduated to the middle and upper classes. Apparently their class is so elite it is -- once again -- "exempt." We should just call them "The Exempt Class." Surprise, surprise.
exactly fren - they are all tools of the enemy.
c.s.lewis personified the way these people are so artfully in screwtape letters.
do wrong, and convince people it is for their own good, and/or the will of God. ..........
and by the way - i aplogize again for my own stupid comment earlier.
would like to blame it on my meds, but cant - there is no excuse.
i disrespected her, and you - and am truly truly sorry.
No problem Del. We've all done it. The written word can be subjective, especially when you're an overly temperamental old man - HA! (that was a joke).
I too would like for all of those women to see this Jaffe Memo. It certainly does provide serious food for thought, but, more importantly, it clarifies that no politician holds "women's rights" on high. It is up to us to use our own good, God-given common sense.
The important thing to keep in mind is that if Obamacare is not repealed, a vast array of potentially abusive options become available to government.
I have a question for the Socialists who like Obama having as much power as possible: why do you apparently completey trust the good intentions of this man, and after him, why do and how can you trust his unknown successor to have the same good intentions you have? Democracy?
If there is one thing we have learned in the past four years, it is that such power overrides Democracy whenever it opposes him. In fact he has accumulated power which leaves Democracy out of the loop. How do you square that at all securely with the will of the people?
I think we have to recognize that the radical Left totally expects the likes of Obama to remain in power. Either that or they just aren't thinking at all. A regime like Obama's demonstrates that very aspiration and views that aspiration as an attainable goal.
I think your second question is answered in my answer to the first?
I used to think totalitarianism was the last thing I would ever see in my country in my lifetime except in a few particulars during real national emergencies such as occurred during the Civil War and the two World Wars. It is staggering to realize the amount of apathy and head in the sandism in America today which allows this to happen.
I thought Americans were a different breed based on accepting unequivocally the notion of the importance of maximum individual freedom and Constitutional limits on government power. Now we're proving to have become just like all the other dupes living under dictatorships around the world which Americans used to pity.
I blame the changes in education, news "reporting," parenting and decline of faith primarily. But the shift has been absolutely incredible in its apparent swiftness.
Just twenty years ago we were celebrating our uniqueness and exceptionalism with the centenniel of the Statue of Liberty. Now I'm wondering when it will be renamed The Statue of Tyranny.
How did this happen? Slowly. Originally planned and executed by world powers whose goal is to bring America into a One World Order, One World Government ("OWO/OWG," U.N. governance). The only way to do that with Americans is to weaken our strengths and lord power over our people. Joseph Stalin's (USSR Communist until 1953) said it best:They've been most successful, haven't they? Even this 1969 Planned Parenthood Memo played a part in directing us toward their goals. If you haven't yet, read the 1958 list of Communist Goals to incorporate America into Communism (linked above). I can't recall a one that hasn't since materialized. They were spot on.
What we see today is what Communists set out to do. "Community Organizers" like Obama were the brain child of Saul Alinsky, a Marxist. More recently described by the Cloward-Piven strategies, which incorporate chaos, social upheaval and encourage violence.
Communists renamed themselves "Progressives," a nice-sounding word, knowing Americans would not accept them as Communists. They infiltrated our government and our institutions. Americans slept, trusting government to do the right thing; or wrongly thinking that our last 50-years of "nudgings" (the basis of Obama Czar Sunstein's book) were relatively harmless.
Progressives increasingly pushed laws that undermined the integrity of our Constitution. They implanted themselves in our schools. We failed teaching our children the sacrifices made and how and why our country's freedoms were founded. Progressives ushered in nice sounding phrases like "political correctness," causing us to think differently about our country and our values.
This administration's players literally come from the 1970's Kent State "Anti-War Movement," attempting a revolution then with the aid and at the direction of Communists. If you haven't yet, please watch that short video here . The similarities are astonishing. Most of us thought they'd finally grown up, only to learn they continued cultivating in the dark, now dispersed throughout Obama's administration.
I think it's safe to say that Old Guard (Progtressive) Republicans are as much a part of the ruse as are the radical Left, referred to as RINOs (Republican In Name Only). IMO that's why Repub's campaigning now come across as detrimental to the bigger cause. The OG GOP knows who they want and why. Team Obama's media makes sure it all looks chaotic. Chaos is the Progressives' mainstay.
It's up to us to make sure these tactics are not successful, especially so when it comes to the media. The only way we can ensure that is to think and reason for ourselves. I'm doing a lot of praying and suggest all believers do. That is the one Power that no one can play with :).
I, too, believed Americans were always a better people than this. In fact, a majority of us still are. It's Alinsky Rule #1 that causes to question ourselves: Power is not only what you have, but what an opponent thinks you have. If your organization is small, hide your numbers in the dark and raise a din that will make everyone think you have many more people than you do. Liberals are not a majority, they are just loudest and most indecent so it feels like there's more of them than there is.
The media is definitely to Big Blame. But I just received this, haven't read it myself yet. Sometimes their links are tricky, may require copying&pasting: http://www.therothshow.com/demos/recent/... [1]
http://www.therothshow.com/demos/recent/... [2]
http://www.therothshow.com/demos/recent/... [3]http://homelandsecurityus.com/archives/2966 [4]
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php... [5]Hmph. Sounds like Chicago politics at its finest? When they come to drag us away, Eagle, I'm gonna ask for a gallows spot next to you :). Dear God be with us all.
1]
2] All 3 are audio files to download. See shotcuts below.
3]
Complete shortcuts for audio files above:
1] http://www.therothshow.com/demos/recent/hour1Aug0709.mp3
2] http://www.therothshow.com/demos/recent/hour2Aug0709.mp3
3] http://www.therothshow.com/demos/recent/hour3Aug0709.mp3
4] Canada Free Press 2009 "Media Blackout On Obama Eligibility" Full link: http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13373
5] Canada Free Press - Appears to be story link page. I didn't see the article referenced. BUT I am telling you, you ought to read the articles there! Wow - Canada has a better grip on us than we have on us and it is NOT a pretty picture!
Full link: http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php
6] WND 2012 article, "Did Threats Silence Media On Obama Probe?" Full link: http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/did-threats-silence-media-on-obama-probe/
Hope these help. If you need more help getting to them, let me know.
It would be entirely to be expected that Roberts or Kennedy might get an offer they could not refuse from some Obamunist thug. It was the first thing I thought of when Roberts yesterday seemed to be taking the idea seriously that the federal government had the authority under the commerce clause to force citizens to buy things.
Socialists have accused the Bushes of similar shenanigans in the past. But if you come out of the Chicago political machine environment the chances of it being true seem much greater.
This is the most important development in the Obama Presidency since Obamacare itself passed Congress by hook or crook. They have schemed for far too long and worked too hard to subvert the system they despise not to be prepared to pull out every stop to protect it. The end justifies the means was never more relevent than with the secular Socialist leadership attitude on that.
BTW I was wondering if there has been a resolution of the Alabama law similar to the Georgia one requiring candidates to prove that they are qualified under the Constitution to run for President? The judge in Georgia was in the bag for the administration. Just wondering if Alabama or any other state has similarly had a judicial under-the-rug-sweep of the iassue.
I've heard that any decision from the SC isn't expected until about June. I followed tweets on it yesterday and they were all excited like everything was turning up roses. Every time someone does that I am reminded of all the news reports that came out the week before Obamacare, "No way it'll be revived, that bill is dead, yada, yada." Yeh, right. Never count your chickens before they hatch. I pray you are wrong about any of SCers being bought or threatened off, but I have to agree about the investment made.
Gee, I haven't heard anything about the Alabama ballot law? I'll keep my ear to the ground. That Georgia case was sure bizarre, wasn't it? It was all legally established as an Obama no-show, won by default done deal and something like a week later they suddenly just find in Obama's favor? Boy if that didn't stink big time. I thought for sure Georgia would stick to its guns. Very disappointing.
I want to believe these thugs cannot stand in the way of states voter ID laws. It is unconscionable that they would even oppose them, everyone knows there's only one real reason they do. I tell ya, Eagle, I never thought there were so many easily led Americans as what we find today. It's sickening, knowing they are doing it purely out of "we want/we can." It is disturbing to come to the realization that you live among so many self-serving human beings.
Is this the Alabama law you were referring to? Maybe you meant the voter ID? I did read they have to go through the "preclearance" for that and I don't think they've applied for that yet? Since Obama provides clearances and since he seems to be a considerably less than above the law kinda guy, seems unlike they would get it. If I were King I'd get rid of that court jester.
Sad that the lawsuit didn't get anywhere. Too many Socialist judges and lawyers running interference for Obama, just like in Georgia, where you may recall a judge ruled Obama qualified despite all the evidence presented to the contrary and the fact that no one even showed up with any evidence to defend Obama at the hearing!
We must keep in mind too that where Obama was born is not the only thing which disqualifies him from running for President.
1. The Constituition requires both parents to be American citizens. Obama's father was a dual citizen of Great Britain and Kenya when Obama was born.
2. The Constitution disqualifies anyone who ever lived under a different name. Obama was Barry Soetoro for years, including when he was at Occidental.
3. The Constitution does not allow anyone to be President who was ever a citizen of a foreign country. Obama became a citizen of Indonesia as a child, and travelled to Pakistan from the US at a time when American citizens were barred by the State Department from doing so.
IN THE INTEREST OF HONEST DISCLOSURE
It's not America's Left that we face, it is world communism.
I have seen no evidence in the past 40 years that anything in this memo has been implemented. I think it's nonsensical hysteria put out by those that would see PP destroyed. Anyone that knows anything about PP knows that its primary purpose is NOT to perform abortions. It is to help women get quality health care and birth control. And if someone wants an abortion, that's their business, not anyone else's. JMO.
Article 2 Section 1 of the Constitution says that a person has has to be a "natural born citizen" to be eligible. It does not say that the perrsons has to be borm within the physical confines of the US. A child born to an American mother while out of the country is considered a natural born citizen even if the father is not a citizen.
Of course, this is all a moot discussion because Obama WAS BORN IN THE USA.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_the_United_States#Eligibility