![]()
"No one cares that this guy is
nothing but a two-bit mafia thug and criminal."Â
Â
[OPINION] According to this March 16, 2012 interview with Hollywood Producer Bettina Sofia Viviano, she witnessed voter fraud throughout the West Coast. This interview was uploaded a few days ago, in video form on YouTube, by BirtherReportDotCom. I was hesitant to post this. I can't speak to its validity, but it rang true to me. It wouldn't surprise me if this video is removed from YouTube soon?
Ms Viviano is introduced as being highly regarded in Beveraly Hills and a friend of Andrew Breitbart. She tells of her film background and receiving a call from someone who'd worked with Hillary Clinton, asking if she was interested in doing a documentary about voter fraud in the 2008 Democrat Primary.
Bettina speaks to "caucuses" as "hot beds for fraud" and of an experience that "scarred her for life" because of "Alinsky, created chaos, Acorn" type "death threats and vandalism." She summed it up by saying of Democrats, "They play dirty."
The filmmaker's partners were Hillary Clinton supporters. After drafting the film they showed it at the DNC Denver Convention, thinking the DNC would do something about Obama stealing the nomination from Hillary. That's when they learned that the "Nancy Pelosi's and Howard Dean's" of the DNC were the ones who had perpetrated the fraud, saying, "We were basically reporting the fraud to the people who did it."
Ms Viviano speaks to moral differences between the Democrat and Republican parties: "The difference is," she says, "Democrats don't consider voter fraud to be bad because they have 'moral relativity.' Whatever they do, lie, cheat, steal, it's for the collective better good, which, in their minds, makes whatever they do acceptable."
The filmmaker talks about what Obama did to ensure he ran unchallenged for the Illinois Senate seat; Bill Ayers throwing his Obama dinner party; Bill Clinton joking about Obama not being qualified as a U.S. president; documentation proving Obama was chosen by the DNC back in 2004; and how Democrats use Acorn to do the dirty work.
Ms Viviano says they've written several people in an effort to make things right, mentioning Diane Feinstien's name and closing, "No one cares that this guy is nothing but a two-bit mafia thug and criminal." In referencing Gloria Alred she explains the legal/illegal aspects of the DNC, which she analogized as a "crime syndicate." The DNC is accused of illegally forcing state delegates to violate the will of their voters by changing nominee votes at the convention.
Bettina tells of meeting with Andrew Breitbart, who wanted to combine her film with his "Pigford" footage, saying, "Now we know that isn't going to happen." They've also had offers from PJ Media among others to help finish the film, but her Democrat partner seems fearful of the prospects.
Â
Voter Fraud in 2008 Democrat Primiaries
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxGFmWtykqg
UPDATE
Put a face to the voice, click Jerome Corsi interviews Bettina Viviano
Â
Â
 And here we are ... four years later.
![]()
Critical Race Theory Goes to the Polls
Courtesy of Breitbart Big Govenrment, by Dr. Timothy Daughtry
Why would anyone, let alone the Attorney General of the United States, oppose measures designed to reduce voter fraud, such as the simple requirement that voters show identification before voting?
For that matter, why would anyone object to homeowners locking their homes upon leaving, or to motorists locking their cars when they get out of the car? Some actions are so obviously dictated by such simple prudence that objecting to them would inevitably raise eyebrows.
So why would Attorney General Eric Holder and so many others on the left leave themselves open to the perception that they are “asking for†voter fraud by opposing voter ID? That perception was worsened by two recent news reports about the risk of voter fraud that ran just as the Justice Department blocked a new voter ID law in Texas.
A recent video by James O’Keefe of Project Veritas shows how easy it would be to commit voter fraudin Vermont. As reported on Breitbart.com, a Veritas agent went to different voting places around Vermont, each time giving a different name, and each time was offered a primary ballot. In an earlier video released on The Daily Caller, O’Keefe had raised similar concerns ... . Read complete article HERE.
Â







Comments: 16
I'm confident if someone really looked into it there would be serious Constitutional violations in how these party shenanigans wrongly interfere with the American process. "Ahhh, if I were King."
People are gyped either way. It's like these big bullies are having
parties that we donate to and pay for in good faith, only for them
to laugh all the way to the bank knowing well who's going to be
selected in the end anyway. How insulting. Perhaps our generation
has set the pact for putting an end to it, I hope future generations
take hold of that tail. I'm confident this is not what our forefathers
had in mind.
BTW, you may have heard of it but in case you haven't, are you
familiar with Goooh.com? It is a fantastic concept but I
don't think it's picked up much steam? I was convinced from the onset that
the name they gave it would be its downfall, ragardless the good concept
that it is.
I have heard of that GOOOH, but not looked into it in any depth. I do know I now support term limits of some kind, something I didn't used to really favor. Now I think the pros of it would outweigh the cons, and break the cycle of long term relationships with special interests, over played party loyalties for re-election/funding reasons, corruption, etc. Also now feel there should be a Constitutional/legislative(?) form of budget control for Congress, that is flexible to an extent when necessary, but geared mainly at mandatory balancing. This kicking the can down the road, or passing off to the next cycle of administrations and/or Congresses is getting old and completely out of control. Oh well, off the soap-box, LOL!
I agree, term limits are the only way to break big money/big power ties and return the government to The People. It is unfathomable that government does not see our budget as mandatory for balancing. Not balancing our own budget is the ultimate irresponsibility and worse yet in setting any proper example for our People.
There are so many soap boxes to climb on, aren't there? :)
If there's one thing spurs Congressional Progressives into sure action, it is fearing their seats of power and luxury are in jeopardy. That we DO know. We did that in mild form in 2010 - they know we are serious, that we can and that we will do it again in 2012. Call and write them. Each and every one of us.
The consolement offered in all of that is, sources like Oprah are wholly unreliable. Saul Alinksy's Rule 1: Power is not only what you have, but what an opponent thinks you have. If your organization is small, hide your numbers in the dark and raise a din that will make everyone think you have many more people than you do.
They wouldn't be working so hard to convince us otherwise if there wasn't a reason for them to need to work so hard to convince us otherwise. What's that old adage? "Believe half of what you see and none of what you hear." There ARE more of us. Be skeptical and use your own good reasoning, encourage others to do the same - acting on our own common sense is our best weapon :).