
It seems that no matter how much evidence comes to light that George Zimmerman is in fact guilty of murder (not self defense as he claims) some people will side with him (and the worthless cops who refuse to arrest him) no matter what. Â At this point I'm not sure if these people are racists, authority worshipers, or authority worshiping racists, but it really doesn't make much difference. Â For those of you who care about the facts here's what we know so far.
3 weeks ago 17 year old Trayvon Martin was walking to his dad's house in a gated community after walking to the store to get some snacks for himself and his little brother. Â 28 year old George Zimmerman (the self appointed captain of the neighborhood watch) saw Trayvon and thought he looked suspicious, so he called the police.
The "suspicious" behavior that Zimmerman reported was that Trayvon was just "walking around looking about." Â The dispatcher told him he didn't need to follow Trayvon but he did anyway. Â So now we have a 28 year old crazy guy following this 17 year old kid home.
Zimmerman confronted Trayvon carrying a 9 millimeter handgun. Â Trayvon had no weapons on him, just a bag of skittles and a can of iced tea. Â There were several 911 calls from neighbors about what was going on outside. Â You can hear Trayvon screaming for help in the background until the gunshot goes off. Â The tapes as well as statements from witnesses contradict Zimmerman's claim of self defense. Â Before these tapes were released Zimmerman's father released a statement saying that his son did not follow or confront Trayvon.
Still some people side with Zimmerman on his claim that the killing was self defense, even though he is twice the size of his victim. Â It seems to me that even if Trayvon had attacked Zimmerman (which would be understandable considering this creeper was following him home) Zimmerman could have defended himself without using lethal force. Â But that doesn't matter much anyway since witness testimonies don't support Zimmerman's story in the first place, well unless you count the testimony of an officer who "corrected" the testimony of a witness, telling her that it was Zimmerman rather than Martin who cried for help.
The officer in charge of the crime scene also failed to arrest a police lieutenant's son back in 2010 who was videotaped beating a black homeless man.  The attacker was later arrested after the story got out, but it's pretty clear that there is a history of police misconduct in this department.
Before the shooting Zimmerman had been obsessed with crime in the neighborhood, constantly patrolling for anyone he thought looked suspicious.  He called police 46 times since January 1, 2012 for various reasons.  Neighbors complained that Zimmerman used aggressive tactics as the self appointed neighborhood watch captain.  Back in 2005 Zimmerman was charged with assaulting an officer, though the charges were since dropped.  Of course he also shot a 17 year old boy and wasn't charged at all, so take that for what it's worth.
As for Trayvon he had no criminal record, and his teacher described him as "an A and B student who majored in cheerfulness." Â Even still there will be people who for whatever reason side with Zimmerman and the worthless police who refuse to arrest him for murder. Â I guess in their minds people in authority can do no wrong. Â It must be nice to be so naive.









Comments: 31
Clearly the Sanford police took leave of their senses in this case. There will now be efforts to analyze the recordings of the screaming which preceded the sound of the gunshot. If it turns out that the screams came from martin, gonna be real hard for Zimmerman to explain that one.
The 911 tapes certainly prove that!
Your facts seem to be lacking....Well some facts! LOL!
The facts indicate that a neighbor hood watch captain stopped a young man to question him and the young man attacked him.
That is the EVIDENCE so far....anything else is in your racist imagination.
Because when you are accused of wrong doing and I am sitting on the jury to decide your destiny I will consider you innocent until the prosecution presents enough "EVIDENCE" to prove your guilt! I will not rely on prejudice or anger or emotion or racism.
It is NOT I who is disgusting!
You are the one who is suggesting that we should ignore "Innocent until proven guilty"!
I think Zimmerman should have a fair trial. I believe he should be considered innocent until proven guilty. That being said the evidence is there that he murdered an unarmed teenager, and not in self defense because I'm yet to see any evidence that he was in mortal danger.
In order to legitimately claim self defense he would have to prove that he was in mortal danger and that Martin attacked him. All the evidence (including audio of 911 calls) says that Zimmerman went after Martin, and if anything Martin tried to defend himself from this crazy guy following him home at night.
You haven't been the least bit unclear as to your position! You're position is that you think Zimmerman Murdered Trayvon and he should be lynched! Thereby disregarding the most important tenet of our system of justice innocent until PROVEN guilty!
Seriously though, I have better things to do than argue with someone who thinks they know better than me what I believe. Good day sir.
Just here to help....and point out progressive hate and hypocrisy.
When people started saying that he was attacked and received injuries by the victim, given Zimmerman obvious advantage over the victim in size, I was confused to say the least as naturally that didn't make sense to me.
Maybe your next article should be copied from more reliable sources?