Breathless is the key word, even other states are now in shock to whcih they have singed this and are now probably saying rut rooowwww.
GET OBAMA IMPEACHED!!!! This is one PResident that truely deserves IMPEACHMENT!!!
FOR THOSE WHO NEVER HEARD OF AGENDA 21 PLEASE LISTEN, THIS VIDEO MEANS YOUR HOME, YOUR LAND, EVEN THE VERY WELL WATER YOU MIGHT HAVE!! THE WORDS THE FEDS PUT OUT THERE ARE SUGAR COATED TO ALWAYS SOUND GOOD TO THE PUBLIC, BUT WHEN ONE LOOKS DEEPER SUCH AS NDAA, AND ALL THESE OTHER ARGUMENTS OUT THERE WHERE OBAMA NEEDS TO BE IMPEACHED, THERE ARE HARD CORE FACTS ON HIS LIES. THE MAIN STREAM MEDIA IS PAID NOT TO ADVERTISE ANYTHING LIKE THAT. VISIT AGENDA21.COM
Â
Whereas Congress has not considered or passed a formal authorization for the President to continue military operations in Libya; and
S.J.RES.16 -- Whereas Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution of the United States reserves for Congress the right to declare war; (Introduced in Senate - IS)
SJ 16 IS
Â
112th CONGRESS
Â
1st Session
Â
S. J. RES. 16
Declaring that the President has exceeded his authority under the War Powers Resolution as it pertains to the ongoing military engagement in Libya.
Â
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
Â
May 25, 2011Mr. PAUL introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations
<hr>Â
JOINT RESOLUTION
Declaring that the President has exceeded his authority under the War Powers Resolution as it pertains to the ongoing military engagement in Libya.
Whereas Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution of the United States reserves for Congress the right to declare war;
Whereas the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1541 et seq.) states that it is intended to `fulfill the intent of the framers of the Constitution of the United States' in requiring the President to seek the consent of Congress before the introduction of the United States Armed Forces into hostile action;
Whereas the President must seek authorization from Congress prior to engaging the United States Armed Forces in an armed conflict absent an imminent threat to national security;
Whereas President Barack Obama, without seeking a formal authorization from Congress, ordered the execution of a sustained military engagement through the enforcement of a no-fly zone in Libya on March 19, 2011;
Whereas Congress did not consider or pass a formal authorization for the President to initiate military operations in Libya;
Whereas the War Powers Resolution establishes that the President must notify Congress of the introduction of the United States Armed Forces within 48 hours after commencing such action;
Whereas President Obama acknowledged his obligation to submit a notification of his actions in Libya under the War Powers Resolution through a letter delivered on March 21, 2011, to Speaker of the House John Boehner and President Pro Tempore of the Senate Daniel Inouye;
Whereas section 8(a) the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1547(a)) establishes that the President may not construe authorization from any other act or treaty unless such act or treaty is `implemented by legislation specifically authorizing the introduction of the United States Armed Forces into hostilities';
Whereas President Obama contends that hostile engagement by the military forces of the United States against the Government of Libya was part of a multilateral response authorized by United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 (2011) and in consultation with the Arab League;
Whereas section 2(c) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1541(c)) provides that no attempt by the President to introduce the United States Armed Forces into hostile action may be made under the War Powers Resolution unless there is `(1) a declaration of war, (2) a specific authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces';
Whereas the Government of Libya, immediately prior to the introduction of the United States Armed Forces into the conflict on March 19, 2011, had not attacked the United States nor declared any intent to do so;
Whereas President Obama had stated the purpose of enforcing a no-fly zone over Libya was to `take all necessary measures to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack in Libya' and not in response to any direct or immediate threat to the United States;
Whereas section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1544(b)) further establishes that, in absence of authorization from Congress, the President may not engage the United States Armed Forces in an armed conflict for a period longer than `sixty calendar days';
Whereas members of the United States Armed Forces have remained engaged in operations in Libya since March 19, 2011;
Whereas, on May 20, 2011, the limit of sixty calendar days placed on the President's ability to continue engagement of the military forces of the United States against the Government of Libya will have been exhausted under the terms of the War Powers Resolution;
Whereas Section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1544(b)) requires that `within sixty calendar days . . . the President shall terminate any use of United States Armed Forces . . . unless the Congress (1) has declared war or has enacted a specific authorization for such use of the United States Armed Forces, (2) has extended by law such sixty-day period, or (3) is physically unable to meet as a result of an armed attack upon the United States';
Whereas President Obama reiterated on May 20, 2011, that the military forces of the United States remain engaged in hostilities, including `suppression and destruction of air defenses' and `precision strikes by unmanned aerial vehicles';
Whereas Congress has not considered or passed a formal authorization for the President to continue military operations in Libya; and
Whereas President Obama has not indicated any intent to cease operations in Libya after the sixty-day limit established by the War Powers Resolution: Now, therefore, be it:
Â
Â
- Â (1) declares that, as it pertains to the continuing armed engagement of the United States Armed Forces against the Government of Libya, the President has exceeded the statutory time limits placed on him by the War Powers Resolution and is therefore in violation of the law; and
Â
- Â (2) calls on the President to--
Â
- Â
- Â (A) seek a formal authorization from Congress to continue the mission in Libya; or
- Â
Â
- Â
- Â (B) cease armed engagement against the Government of Libya until such time as further action is authorized by Congress.
- Â





Comments: 21
Chuck, did Congress declare WAR on Lybia? No they did not.
Case closed. He's guilty and must be impeached.
Trust me... I was NEVER the "town bully" in high school.
It's called the War Powers Act and both Bushes used it too!
The aim is to promote global sustainable development at a more fundamental level than traditional aid programmes, based on common needs and interests, and on collective responsibility. Agenda 21, as agreed by national governments at Rio de Janeiro, is an action plan at all scales, requiring local governments to develop their own ‘Local Agenda 21’ in order to spread understanding of, and action for, sustainable development.
Agenda 21 is accessible online at http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/agenda21/index.htm.
Read more: http://www.answers.com/topic/agenda-21#ixzz1okOlaZCn
U.S. Rep. Trent Franks
A Republican congressman has told a left-leaning blog that if there is collective support, he would favor the impeachment of Barack Obama over his decision to stop defending the federal Defense of Marriage Act.
Scott Keyes of ThinkProgress.org asked U.S. Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz.: “I know Newt Gingrich has came out (sic) and said if they don’t reverse course here, we ought to be talking about possibly impeaching either Attorney General [Eric] Holder or even President Obama to try to get them to reverse course. Do you think that is something you would support?†Keyes asked.
Ads by Google
Most Ridiculous LawsuitWhat's this month's most ridiculous lawsuit? Vote in the poll! www.FacesOfLawsuitAbuse.org
Michael savageListen to Conservative Talk Shows Right From Your Browser - For Free! www.ConservativeTalkNow.com
Read all about the grounds for impeachment.
Franks replied: “If it could gain the collective support, absolutely. I called for Eric Holder to repudiate the policy to try terrorists within our civil courts, or resign. So it just seems like that they have an uncanny ability to get it wrong on almost all fronts.â€
http://www.wnd.com/2011/03/270077/
S. J. Res. 16: A joint resolution declaring that the President has exceeded his authority under the War Powers...
112th Congress: 2011-2012
90%
10%
A joint resolution declaring that the President has exceeded his authority under the War Powers Resolution as it pertains to the ongoing military engagement in Libya.
Sponsor: Sen. Rand Paul [R-KY]
Status: This resolution is in the first step in the legislative process. Explanation: Introduced bills and resolutions first go to committees that deliberate, investigate, and revise them before they go to general debate. The majority of bills and resolutions never make it out of committee. [Last Updated: Jun 2, 2011 6:25AM]
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=sj112-16
It is hysterical how you can so obviously pick out those who flunked history, and never learned that history always repeats itself...
wing nuts are even having their kids taught at school, oh my the kids are leaning all about what they want them to learn, never mind what you want YOUR kid to learn.... oh and I guess all your freak nuts are ok with schools giving your kids shots/vaccinations with our your permission to is that ok with you all, is it ok that your amazon mistress makes your kids eat what she wants them to eat and the next moron who comes in as President ........... boy you people are really in the dark and it shows severely..
SJ 16 IS
112th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. J. RES. 16
Declaring that the President has exceeded his authority under the War Powers Resolution as it pertains to the ongoing military engagement in Libya.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
May 25, 2011
Mr. PAUL introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JOINT RESOLUTION
Declaring that the President has exceeded his authority under the War Powers Resolution as it pertains to the ongoing military engagement in Libya.
Whereas Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution of the United States reserves for Congress the right to declare war;
Whereas the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1541 et seq.) states that it is intended to `fulfill the intent of the framers of the Constitution of the United States' in requiring the President to seek the consent of Congress before the introduction of the United States Armed Forces into hostile action;
Whereas the President must seek authorization from Congress prior to engaging the United States Armed Forces in an armed conflict absent an imminent threat to national security;
Whereas President Barack Obama, without seeking a formal authorization from Congress, ordered the execution of a sustained military engagement through the enforcement of a no-fly zone in Libya on March 19, 2011;
Whereas Congress did not consider or pass a formal authorization for the President to initiate military operations in Libya;
Whereas the War Powers Resolution establishes that the President must notify Congress of the introduction of the United States Armed Forces within 48 hours after commencing such action;
Whereas President Obama acknowledged his obligation to submit a notification of his actions in Libya under the War Powers Resolution through a letter delivered on March 21, 2011, to Speaker of the House John Boehner and President Pro Tempore of the Senate Daniel Inouye;
Whereas section 8(a) the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1547(a)) establishes that the President may not construe authorization from any other act or treaty unless such act or treaty is `implemented by legislation specifically authorizing the introduction of the United States Armed Forces into hostilities';
Whereas President Obama contends that hostile engagement by the military forces of the United States against the Government of Libya was part of a multilateral response authorized by United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 (2011) and in consultation with the Arab League;
Whereas section 2(c) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1541(c)) provides that no attempt by the President to introduce the United States Armed Forces into hostile action may be made under the War Powers Resolution unless there is `(1) a declaration of war, (2) a specific authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces';
Whereas the Government of Libya, immediately prior to the introduction of the United States Armed Forces into the conflict on March 19, 2011, had not attacked the United States nor declared any intent to do so;
Whereas President Obama had stated the purpose of enforcing a no-fly zone over Libya was to `take all necessary measures to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack in Libya' and not in response to any direct or immediate threat to the United States;
Whereas section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1544(b)) further establishes that, in absence of authorization from Congress, the President may not engage the United States Armed Forces in an armed conflict for a period longer than `sixty calendar days';
Whereas members of the United States Armed Forces have remained engaged in operations in Libya since March 19, 2011;
Whereas, on May 20, 2011, the limit of sixty calendar days placed on the President's ability to continue engagement of the military forces of the United States against the Government of Libya will have been exhausted under the terms of the War Powers Resolution;
Whereas Section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1544(b)) requires that `within sixty calendar days . . . the President shall terminate any use of United States Armed Forces . . . unless the Congress (1) has declared war or has enacted a specific authorization for such use of the United States Armed Forces, (2) has extended by law such sixty-day period, or (3) is physically unable to meet as a result of an armed attack upon the United States';
Whereas President Obama reiterated on May 20, 2011, that the military forces of the United States remain engaged in hostilities, including `suppression and destruction of air defenses' and `precision strikes by unmanned aerial vehicles';
Whereas Congress has not considered or passed a formal authorization for the President to continue military operations in Libya; and
Whereas President Obama has not indicated any intent to cease operations in Libya after the sixty-day limit established by the War Powers Resolution: Now, therefore, be it:
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That Congress--
(1) declares that, as it pertains to the continuing armed engagement of the United States Armed Forces against the Government of Libya, the President has exceeded the statutory time limits placed on him by the War Powers Resolution and is therefore in violation of the law; and
(2) calls on the President to--
(A) seek a formal authorization from Congress to continue the mission in Libya; or
(B) cease armed engagement against the Government of Libya until such time as further action is authorized by Congress.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:sj16:
Sec. 201. Findings.
Sec. 202. Definitions.
Sec. 203. Independent and objective conduct of audits and investigations relating to United States contributions to the United Nations system.
Sec. 204. Transparency for United States contributions.
Sec. 205. Integrity for United States contributions.
Sec. 206. Refund of monies owed by the United Nations to the United States.
Sec. 207. Annual reports on United States contributions to the United Nations.
What this will eventually mean that the UN can take our property, or tell us to close up our water wells.
Other crime Obama committed, it is illegal to be President of the Untied States, " AND" be on the UN SECURITY COUNCIL" , it is unconstitutional therefore it is considered TREASON.. " IMPEACH"..!! ..
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/F?c112:1:./temp/~c112LALjhx:e818: