Well first less than a million republicans showed up in Ohio. Why were the republicans not interested enough to vote for any of those four dufuses? Or are there less than a million republicans in Ohio?
Second most Americans that live here in the USA do know that Clinton was paying down the USA debt and that George W. Bush cut taxes which only raised the USA debt and created two wars that were totally unfounded and one of those war was for no reason at all, thus raising the debt more. The results of that stupid management by George W. Bush drove the country into a depression with over 22 million folk losing their jobs. Yes it was a depression as almost any economist will tell you, however, the government not wanting to frighten the people in the USA refused to say that, but in about ten to twenty that will be written down in the history books and taught in schools.
Third why are the republicans not voting in this primary?
recommend
Facebook
Twitter
bookmark 
print
Comments: 7
What constitutes "ties"? Such a vague term is meaningless in this context. Give me a definition or something specific and perhaps I may be able to answer a meaningful question.
PS: Note that I will also use your definition with respect to the Republican candidates.
If you use vague terms you will not be understood. Is that your intent? "Ties" could mean anything from exchanging Christmas cards to being married. "Ties" does not mean that one party influenced the other but "ties" could include powerful influence.
Since you are unwilling to specify what you mean I will have to conclude that you merely use the term to assert "guilt by association." You really are only saying you don't like whomever.
So there one has it, Mitt Romney for President and Rick Santorum for Vice President. Kinda dull don’t ya think?