Here's a Surpise - One of Cain's "Anonymous" Accusers Works for the Obama Administration

Dirty politics? Big suprise; - NOT

You're right. No surprise.

Hi Marilyn
I think it's just a diversion thought up by the Liberal Democrats and Drive By Media. They are so concerned about Perry that they are trying to get anyone they can. Looks like Romney they are currently pushing and he is more Liberal then they.

Gingrich would be good for the Conservatives but, Libs think they can beat him. They have tarnished Cain for good. A vote for Romney is a vote for the Dems and the Drive By Media.
Good to see you writing again.
Lou- Shazam

Did you see this? Homeland Security Advisor Accused of Leaking Docs about Texas/Perry?

I want the person nominated whom Democrats fear most. :)

I just saw an interview on CNN of a govt employee who is supporting the charges, raving about the character of the accuser. If this were for charges against a Dem, they would be threatening her job for speaking publicly. There is no end to the blatant bully tactics of driving this election to the chosen course.

And it will get worse.

I wonder if there's a paper record of all this 10 tears ago? Isn't that when the charge was filed? How would she have know what Cain and Obama would become in 10 years?

She works for somebody in the Treasury Department. How many people work in the "Obama Administration" like that??? (could this be coincidence???)

I don't know, Peter. How many coincidences can there be?

It would certainly be a coincidence if she actually made her complaint back when. If she's making it for the first time now then she is lying or it's just too late.

I was meaning that the one who came forward has a Chicago connection. Now this one works in the Obama administration?

Even if they complained back then, it doesn't mean much. Why would they wait until he was highest in the polls? Makes no sense.

It makes a lot of sense. You run for President and all your old dirt comes out. It works that way for anybody and everybody who runs.

Sometimes what happens is a conspiracy and sometimes it's just a funny irony ...

(So far, this one looks like a very funny irony)

I doubt that, Peter. It looks like typical Chicago thuggery.

peter,
"Sometimes what happens is a conspiracy and sometimes it's just a funny irony ..."
i agree - tho there are other possibilities as well.
opf course no one knew 10 or 14 years ago what obama and cain would be doing now.
but that doesnt mean there wasnt a 'call' by the dems, for anyone and everyone that ever had the thinnist, and slimiest of things they could say.
the gop has certainly done it was well - that is why i hate both parties, tho i despise the progressives the most.

>but that doesnt mean there wasnt a 'call' by the dems:

How does one make such a call? (I never heard one made, I don't have any dirt on anybody but how would they know that, LOL )

Regardless, if somebody had dirt on something nasty that happened in the past it SHOULD come out. Maybe now that she is outed we can see what that paperwork on this incident says, from 10 years ago. Maybe it's really stupid anyway (in most people's opinions). Maybe it's just nasty. Let us be the judge of that, now, since we can't take their word for it now.

>It looks like typical Chicago thuggery.

I'm sure there's thuggery all over the place in America.

"How does one make such a call? (I never heard one made, I don't have any dirt on anybody but how would they know that, LOL )"
really?
you are really going to pose that question.
ok.
since you ask the wuestion, demonstrating that you are so out of touch with any and all reality, here ya go.
first, it is not a 'call' in the way you call out the window, or door for your kids.
it is not a 'call' on a telephone, wire or cans connected with string.
it is an expression - ummm - a thing that people say, that is adults know has a specific meaning.
in this case, it is asking all the grown ups in their own group, to tell each other, to ask anyone they know, if there is anything they can use to make a specific person look bad.
and then alllllllll those grown up people ask all the other people that they know, and if anyone has heard anything, it gets repeated back to the person that started the "call".
does that help or do i need to use smaller words?

Some pretty spooky stuff. She got her job in 2010 Cain announced his candidacy in may of 2011.

but her getting the job was to make sure that Cain didnt get the presidency before he even knew he wanted it.

haha ya know whats a more disgusting piece of SH#T? Cain for harassing these women.

what other candidates has she defamed? You said that was her job so where is the list?

lori,
the problem is this - cain may be a total slimeball - we do not know yet.
i tend to have a slight problem, when a person who claims they had a situation, that would indeed be tramatic, and disturbing - suddenly be willing to forget it and not want to punish the perpetrator, for a few grand, or evn 100 - is their honor and outrage that cheap?
not saying it is every time - but i do wonder - i also wonder when 2 or 3 people do the exact same thing around the same exact time to the same exact person (filing accusations) and all are willing to be paid off - not by the person they should righfully despise, but by the comapny the person works for.
surely, the way grapevines are - the 2nd or 3rd persxon knew there was a history of the company paying off.
again not saying that this is what happened.
as too clinton - there is no way a potus, can claim a 20 something intern was a 'willing' participant - the power of one person vs the other is simply too overwhelming. in fact morally, the disparity of position, makes it rape to a large extent. because no way would she have done what she did, if he were say a factory worker!
as too jf kennedy - well marilyn was well known enough that she would be almost an equal, and has no comaprison to clinton or cain.
teddy was another matter, and he was responsible for killing mary jo by leaving her to drown, as he escaped, poffered zero help, and ran to cover his butt.
it was not before my time at all - i remember it so clearly - and could never understand how he was not charged with at least negligent homicide, let alone how he could be a senator after those events.
now - many others on both sides have done as bad - no denial.
just that on cain - the 'jury' is still out - the ponly person that can say he is guilty would be nancy grace, as she always seems to have more knowledge than anyone, and convicts or aquits on her own.

del sometimes it doesnt have anything to do with honor. If you get into a position like this you dont think about honor you think that you have be3en put throught the wringer and want it to end.

I am not saying that all of them are telling the truth or all are lying...I too question the woman who got the 35k...sounds to me like she wanted to make a couple thousand dollars quick and did.

But to have 4 women clain the same thing? A bit much dont you think?

it is indeed a bit much to think that 4 women would all have been just out for money.
and yes i certainly understand the wanting it over standpoint.
i certainky understand it in situations of child molestation - do you put your kids thru the circus of a trial and all the publicity. having known several (there was a local priest where i lived........) there is no aspertion at all pon not pressing it.
i do however wonder about grown adults, and have seen it happen that one person gets money on a trumped up charge, and suddenly 2 or 3 more have their hand out - tho i may also be mistaken, but i think they were all in nra and pressed the charges rom there.
just makes me wonder is all - like he was with coca-cola and pilssbury/godfather a decade ort so - if he is a slimeball - did it suddenly start at nra?
i dont know - as i said - nothing has been proven by anyone - just accusations - many say there are anywhere between 1% and as many as 45% false accusations of rape - a study by the air force in 85, showed about 60% of rape allegations (between military personell) were false. the reasons were spite/revenge, shame, to hide an affair from a spouse and others - these were the primary ones.
much like those accused of, and even convicted of murder - many are in jail wrongly, because they did not do the crime, in spite of any evidence put forth.
all ai am saying is, clinton admitted it, so there is no dispute - cain - we simply do not know yet, and it is highly unfair to convict him of it, without a proper vetting of facts.
this last one, certainly seems to be someone that was found, and thrown on to the 'bandwagon'.
if she did indeed suffer this tragic event - why did she need a script?
it is just too early to crucify the man.
if he is guilty - then i am in agreement on every condenming comment anyone, anywhere has made.

del I agree its too early to crusify him or them....and what I am seeing is that the supposed victims are being called liars.

if the accusations are false - they are liars ........
if the accusations are true - he is a liar ......
having been falsely accused myself of harrassment - i asked a woman where she had gotten the blouse she was wearing - had only seen her from the back, and she insisted i was staring at her chest (which I had not seen when i asked).
had it not been for another woman in the office that witnessed it all - i would have been in deep trouble.
now yes having been falsely accused (in spite of the witness, it was taken to he head of hr, and i had to attend 'sensitivity' training - just in case?!) maybe i am more sensitive to the issue.
just saying

in case you didnt see when i referenced this incident before - i had been shopping for 3 days for wifes b-day presents - noticed the color and cut as i cam from the back room, and asked thinking it would be perfect - course when the woman whirled arpound, i saw it was very low cut, and my wife would never wear it anyway ........ course i am also sure the woman was still wearing the blouse lasted longer than the marraige lasted - so i should have saved myself the money too lol.

Del sorry that happened to you however this isnt a case of 1 or 2 women but last count was 5.

Now listen to this one.

My bf Michelle was almost raped while at work. She was a nurse and one of the doctors had been borderline inappropriate with her and she just ignored it because she didnt want to jepardize her job.

One day he called her into his office they were supposed to be going over a patients chart....he starts rubbing her neck...she tried to make a joke about it and saying save that for the patients...he then stuck his hand down the front of her shirt and grabbed her breast she got up to leave and he made a grab for her...she kicked him and ran out.

She went to hr and filed a complaint they even took picture of her disshevled appearance.

The hospital lawyers were ruthless...telling her that false accusations could get her license suspended..so she dropped the whole thing.

She found a different job and the doctor is still practising at the same hospital.

lori,
that is an horrific experience (btw i hate using 'an' before an 'h' word - just seems wrong - anways).
the ruthlessness of some defense lawyers is dispicable - course so it the ruthlessness of some prosecutors. but ........
i dont know - i just dont ...........
gettin weary of it all to be honest ...........
makes my head hurt - guess i need 3 french maid outfits and ............ lol

Del I hear you I am growing weary of this too. And you are naughty....plus you only get 2 french maid outfits or so your wife says and she is the boss ya know.

"i tend to have a slight problem, when a person who claims they had a situation, that would indeed be tramatic, and disturbing - suddenly be willing to forget it"

I was just thinking the same thing...

hey hey hey - i am the boss in my house (when she's not around) - i do what i want when i want anytime i want (to sleep on the couch), i am the top dog (but i been neutered) ................. and dont you forget it young lady!!!!!!

Del ok I will give you that...you are the boss...when you are there by yourself that is...so yes you can sleep on the couch.

So is this the one who got the $35K nuisance settlement?

If so, what this attorney says who worked on this type of case at that time is interesting to note.

Sure, the Obama administration could be behind it, but I'm more likely to think that she's another opportunist who might think this is her chance to boost her government career.

Sue that was an interesting link. I read something similar to that a couple days ago.

You can blame it on anyone you want, but Cain is responsible for Cains problems, no one else. If nothing else, he and his teams handling of this mess demonstrates they don't have the game to play at the national level

Not really, Ron. When people lie about you, it's the liars who are at fault. Check out the link Sue provided about.

That link does not prove anyone lied about anything, Marilyn, it is, what would be termed opinion, and i know ours differ, already.

Its not unreasonable to conclude that the plaintiff who collected $35k from the National Restaurant Association did not have much of a case.

Its also not unreasonable to conclude that she was telling the truth, and took that settlement because she didn't want to go through a typical blame the victim free for all in court, just like you are presiding over here, out of it.

No, that's not unreasonable, Ron. It happens all the time. Ask any doctor whose insurance company paid off on an absurd claim. Cain didn't pay her. He denies anything happened and I believe him over her.

Your prerogative, and i prefer to go with the odds....

Ido too, actually. When a woman continues to make false accusartaions it lowers her credibility tremendously.

Isn't just one woman, obviously, and it doesn't matter, anyway at this point, Cains fifteen minutes of fame is over, from the looks of things...

Because you've said so?

From what i have read, because Republican women have said so...

Keep thinking that.

Well, I hope so, hes nothing but a Kochtopus surrogate, and the Kochs are not interested in the state of this country, or the world, they are interested in the state of Koch industries, period

You're a riot, Ron. The ones not interested in our country are Democrats and Soros.

The Obama re-election campaign would likely appear in front of RNC's doorstep--with alms, offerings, donations, gifts, bouquets....anything--begging it to arrange for a Cain nomination.

The chances of Cain becoming President are about as likely as Bin Laden coming back from the dead.

42% of the country is conservative. If they all vote for anyone but Obama, we'll win no matter who the candidate.

First you have to get them all to the polls. Therein lies the rub, for all concerned, lol.

The Election will be too close to call--especially with the rag-tag Circus candidates, that the GOP has trotted out, in this Election Cycle.

If economic trends improve, even a little, then we will see an Obama re-election.

And the Right will cry, "Foul!"....Obama's cooked the Books!

We'll probably see a re-election because of fraud, Brett, just like we had last time.

Economic trends will not improve, these people have spent two years making sure millions do not have a job, so they can put one man out of a job.

Ron,

The Electorate's disdain for Congress eclipses its disapproval of the President.

That objection is so high that it might trump the Public's disapproval of how Obama is handling his job--which, therefore, could result in Obama's reelection.

i.e., the Public might see that Congressional recalcitrance has, very possibly, abetted economic stagnation noticeably more than what the White House has, or hasn't done.

Maybe, that's one i wouldn't care to predict, Brett. Classically, whoever is in office in bad times, takes the bullet, no matter who is at fault, which is why they have employed this strategy. Its tantamount to treason to the people of this nation, but it has every chance of working. Many people are not smart enough, do not pay attention enough, to see the distinction.

Obama and Congress are at fault for the mess we're in now. Every one who has stopped businesses from going forward to create jobs needs booted out, and that means anyone who is promoting increasing taxes on anyone.