Sorry Kirstie, But This Is Not A Size 4

Comments: 21

ʚϊɞ Carol ʚϊɞ Sep 16, 2011, 4:48pm UTC

I agree. She was on Letterman last night and looks bigger than a 4, but my hat still goes off to her for how far she has come!

Kerrell Goolsby Sep 16, 2011, 4:52pm UTC

I agree, Carol. She's not a 4 but it looks like she's trying to get there!

reply to this comment

Pamela Marks Sep 16, 2011, 5:45pm UTC

they do have a size 4 in women's sizes too, but then again that dress is very bulky

August Lady Sep 16, 2011, 6:00pm UTC

Do you mean plus sizes?

Pamela Marks Sep 16, 2011, 8:43pm UTC

yes Lane Bryant does I don't even know what number I am under the new system LOL

August Lady Sep 17, 2011, 1:04am UTC

Hmmm, a new system~obviously to accommodate an ever increasing population~weight-wise, i.e.

Pamela Marks Sep 18, 2011, 1:48am UTC

I suppose

reply to this comment

kayleigh r. Sep 16, 2011, 6:52pm UTC

I think the statements she was making was she COULD fit into a dress that waas size 4...maybe not this one....soem 4's are not as fitted and have an elestic waste-I'm sure I COULD FIT into a 4 (really I'm a 10) too but NOBODY WOULD want to SEE it!! LOL

reply to this comment

Pam Brittain Sep 16, 2011, 7:46pm UTC

She may be a size 4 now. I used to wear a size 4, but since most of our clothes are now made in China (at least the ones I can afford), I have to go to juniors and I wear (in jeans) a size 0. Go figure.

August Lady Sep 16, 2011, 9:26pm UTC

She's not a size 4, that's the point of my post. Size 4 is tiny~she may have lost a lotta weight, but she is by no means tiny~not a size 4 & I'd be willing to bet on it!

Pam Brittain Sep 16, 2011, 9:36pm UTC

Ok - I'm tiny and I'm old. I like to wear jeans that actually fit. I'm 5'4", am about 98 pounds (or less depending on who is cooking) and a woman's size four will fall off me. Wasn't the case until a few years ago when they changed the sizing.

But, I agree with you. I like her a lot and yes - she has a long ways to go.

August Lady Sep 16, 2011, 11:47pm UTC

"I'm 5'4", am about 98 pounds"

Yep, that's real tiny~I don't consider anyone weighing over 140 lbs (maybe even 130) tiny~just mho!

Pam Brittain Sep 17, 2011, 2:16pm UTC

Bet you're right - 140 pounds? She could lose a bit more.

reply to this comment

Risa G. Sep 17, 2011, 12:08am UTC

I saw another picture from this fashion show and the dress she was wearing was a bit tighter. Definitely didn't look like size 4 ( hpphow i wish I was still a 4) but definitely not much more. I say more like a 6. She looks amazing. Whatever she is doing is working since Dancing With The Stars ended.

August Lady Sep 17, 2011, 1:09am UTC

I agree, she still looks great, but my point has been she is not a size 4, not even a 6. I used to be little too, so I know what these sizes look like~not happenin'!

August Lady Sep 17, 2011, 1:13am UTC

I also think that people who where larger sizes have no concept of what a size 0, 1, 2, 4 actually is~my daughter is a 0/1, her friends 1-4, they are small people. BIG people DO NOT fit in size 4!!!

Risa G. Sep 17, 2011, 11:26am UTC

If she loses enough weight OR she works out enough to get down there she probably would be a size 4. She wasn't always fat. She used to be very skinny. I saw a whole biography of Kirstie. She was a very scrawny person. I hope she gets down there but she looks good where she is right now. I don't want her to look unhealthy.