As I have problems with <strong>these drafts and Gather.com</strong>, you may see large and legible ones on:
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://geebee090.hubpages.com/hub/Drafts" title="Drafts" target="_self">http://geebee090.hubpages.com/hub/Drafts</a>
Now, in order to reach evolving reality we shall consider the Observer remaining on the very same "space position" on the horizontal (So-S'o), the Space Axis.
However, time flows of course, therefore the Observer has reached the O point coming from -1 and going to +1.
(I disregarded the time period from -1 to O and from O to +1, as it could be a second, an hour, a day, a month or, even, several years)
Let us examine the positions of an Observer staying on the same place (So-S’o axis) but, of course, living on the time axis (to-T0). This means that, as time flows out, he goes from -1 to +1 while the light travels one way at 186,000 per second.

Fig. 2 – The Minkovsky’s world dynamic representation
We now can figure out 12 peculiar areas the Observer has to face each time. I mean that we, as Observers, are as well exposed to the same problems which, per se, will keep changing our own perception of the object, problem or event we look at.
Let us make some observations:
We now face 3 different groups of 4 elements each which will be discussed and analyzed mainly within the NEXT post of mine. However, if there are questions or comments, all of them will be welcomed, even if they risk to be detailed within the very next posts.
· Two ABSOLUTE areas
· An area implied by the system time evolution itself
· An area related to the cultural accumulated experience of the observer
Let me introduce the ABSOLUTE areas of and by the system which are always defined by the position of the Observer (O-1 or O or O+1) within the system:

Fig. 2/1 (L-+1, O+1, l’+1)
The shown PAST area is the ABSOLUTE and INFINITE relative to each “time” positions of the Observer. Despite that past remains infinite, noticeable is that it keeps enlarging and therefore diluting as the Observer gets older. History is located there.

Fig. 2/2 (l-1, O-1, L’-1)
The shown FUTURE area is the ABSOLUTE and INFINITE relative to each “time” positions of the Observer. Despite that FUTURE remains infinite, noticeable is that it keeps shrinking as the Observer gets older. Only most immediate future is really "predictable".
Fig. 2/3 (L-1,O-1,l-1 or L0,O,l0 or L+1,O+1, l+1)
These areas are called FUTURE with PAST characteristics (FcP). As a matter of fact, any event in this past SPACE area may become available to the Observer in some future time as time goes on. To be aware simultaneously, the light should overpass its own speed.
Noticeable the size of these areas remains constant at any time.

Fig. 2/4 (l’-1, O-1, L’+1 or l’0, O, L’0 or l’+1, O+1, L’-1)
These areas are called PAST with FUTURE characteristics (PcF). As a matter of fact, any event in this future SPACE area may already have been available to the Observer in some past time but still will happen. To see the event on time, the light should overpass its own speed.
Noticeable the size of these areas remains constant at any time.
In other words, the Observer may be aware of some events quite earlier IF the signal would be carried out by another system able to surpass the light speed.
As this figures are “flat” for convenience, we should not forget that each main area is turning on itself while implosing (FcP) or explosing (PcF).
It is time now to introduce the several - at the least the main ones - positions of the events we may consider:

Fig. 2/5 (L-1, O-1, l’-1)
Located in the ABSOLUTE past area, I would qualify it as “Historical”: the event is so as details tend to be forgotten. Only the main information remains in our memories as they are becoming a genetic function due to the system’s need of conservatism.

Fig. 2/6 (l+1,O+1, L’+1)
Located in the ABSOLUTE future area, I would qualify it as “intangible”: the event is located too far away from the Observer and from any concerned system.

Fig. 2/7 (l+1, C, L+1)
This a FUTURE with PAST (FcP) characteristics which, in a theoretical perfect situation, is an endogenous spiral, the system tending to bring into the apex of the spiral former events, alike genetics memory.

Fig. 2/8 (L’+1, C’, l’+1)
This is a PAST with future characteristics (PcF) which, in a theoretical perfect situation, is an exogenous spiral, the system tending to bring into the basis of the spiral present events, alike small human actions ending into disasters.
All above being settled, let us consider four more events which are directly linked to our cumulated cultural knowledge and/or beliefs.

Fig. 2/9 (O, E, O-1, A)
This area is located into the ABSOLUTE FUTURE of O-1 and into the ABSOLUTE PAST of O and O+1. Any event taking place into this area is ignored by the Observer when in O-1 but has been realized when in O.

Fig. 2/10 (O,B, O+1, D)
This area is located into the ABSOLUTE PAST of O+1 and into the ABSOLUTE FUTURE of O. Any event taking place into this area is ignored by the Observer when in O but has been realized when in O+1. Any "realized" projects responds to this.
Fig. 2/11 (O, A, C, B)
This area is an ABSOLUTE FUTURE for -1 while is a FUTURE with PAST characteristics (FcP) for O and becomes an ABSOLUTE PAST for +1.

Fig. 2/12 (O, D, C’, E)
This area is an ABSOLUTE FUTURE for -1 while is a PAST with FUTURE (PcF) characteristics for O and becomes an ABSOLUTE PAST for +1.
We shall revert to those in the forwarding pages as we initiate the study on economics and the related dynamics.
On the main graph (Fig. 2) , the very first one, there is a segment, unexisting in -1, still unexisting in O but which clearly appears in +1. This segment (C - C') is one of the most important element highlighted by the chart: it shows how acquired knowledge supports each area.
We shall have the opportunity, when reverting on it, to thoroughly analyze it.
I expect to publish next post: Knowledge and Knowledgeable next week. Most probably on Friday. In the meantime, I repeat any question is welcomed.







Comments: 18
The published charts show - I'll discuss it later - that, per example, a lawmaker makes decisions on known past events, often outdated, projected into future which may be out of reality.
No one can project past into future with any kind of certainty.
? and to know that and keep others in the dark it will work just for you ?
Me and Carl Woese approach such things with a similar tactic for the sake of analysis and prediction: The only way to judge the past is to examine the present; the only way to predict the future is basing that prediction on your examination of the present.
We also make predictions on the future based on what is known about the past; sometimes even if that past knowledge is outdated.
In economy we have something similar due to the circulation speed of money which varies and creates huge discrepancies.
Interdisciplinarity can widen our knowledge.
For instance a neutron makes the trip from the sun to earth as a neutron, but at rest it would have become a hydrogen atom in the same length of time. We observe that all events and processes slow down measurably at velocites approaching the speed of light. We must therefore conclude that velocity can vary time. It would require a new theory if we wish to view time as constant.
For the money the problem is similar: if due to lack of confidence, homekeepers restrict spending the overall circulating money slows down and collected taxes as well. However the homekeeper "sees" inflation on food and energy. This is what went on since 2002: The administrations underlined the deflation (due to lower prices on manufactured items alike cars, computers, displays, etc.) while food and energy were and still enjoys sensible inflation.
The problem raised political questions up to the "need" to avoid considering food and energy as components of the core inflation index.
So time remains constant for the homekeeper but circulations is slowing down as far as the administration is concerned.
If, on top of such "ignored" decelaration , the circulating money shrinks, the whole system imploses.
(of course every truth is) ... and in the final analysis ... [(+=-)=(-=+)]=[(=)] ... Monistic GOD (or UNIverse) ... is (=) ... as is Spirit ... two versions of GOD ... the WHOLE and that withIN the WHOLE ... in being so EPHEMERAL, physical oriented man may not know of either ... ego man is thus a (-) compared to "them" ... [but WHEN he becomes aware, the relationships change ... man stays (-) but is much closer to the (+) through the] Spirit (=) ... and in this NOW TRIadic or TRINity relationship of the whole in parts, GOD becomes the relative (+) ...
The pre-Alpha undivided whole is thus MONistic and (=) ... or ( ) ... depending how one prefers to "see" it. (Gilbert's Graph with NO lines yet)
Religion claims that the "division" (Creation) happened with Father (=)(They call (+) becoming Trinity via (+) to (-) and THEN the Holy Spirit (=) being LAST or Third ...
I would think that the ORDER would be Father (=) SPREADING OUT AS (=) until the UNIverse was "full" THEN creation (as The Son) Mankind) MATERIALIZED as the (-) ... at which time the Creator-Father-GOD became the (+) in relative comparison ...
From (=) to (=) to (-) WITH (+) ... THAT being (ALPHA) forward ... ... eventually we will "turn around" (across a Zero Point) and RETURN ... (-) to (=) AND (+) to (=) AND ALL to (=)(OMEGA) ... of course nothing is either the very same or remains the same, so the CYCLE(S) CONTINUE ... probably in some kind of SPIRALING fashion I suppose (?)
PARDON ME GILBERT FOR GETTING OFF TARGET HERE ... My thinking just EXPANDED and I felt a need to get it down in print. :-)
On your thinking, I would be interested you to analyze the horizontal segment called C-C', the one which covers, in O, a part of the past space and a segment of the future space.
Thank you
I might also add here that the RATE of CHANGE would be the greatest at the the two ends, beginning and ending (those being a "form of exponential" change) and the slowest rate would be that in the center ...
Gilbert, I have as yet to "expand" your charts out so that I can read the detail in order to better understand them, as it is I have only used them "superficially". I haven't figured out a way yet to expand them. When I can I will be able to reply in more detail specific to your interests.
As it is I see the "horizontal quadrants" impinging upon the vertical quadrants OF FOCUS as being the UN-NOTICED (out of our awareness) aspects of the WHOLE which we cannot be aware of ... IMnsHO
http://geebee090.hubpages.com/hub/Drafts
From that link ...
I think you did actually answer my question -- we don't have any direct connection with points on the absolute present, other than that which we can extrapolate from looking into conjunctions of events within our own light cone (past or future), or perhaps from overlapping light cones. Barring a hidden-variable effect from something like Bell's Theorem, each plank length is alone in the instant, only able to receive information from the past (we can only perceive the past, including ourselves).
I think I see where this is going with economics or politics -- statistical projections for future events must always be based in information from the past, and so are consequently "diluted" by the expansion of possibilities? Of course, the time that passes for such events to interconnect is determined by the speed of information, which could vary in a civilization.