Casey Anthony Not Guilty of Murder

What I don't get is this ...

Casey Anthony covered things up by lying to police and was found guilty for doing that.

However, she was found not guilty of what she covered up.

Say what?

There are many questions however, that still need to be answered.

Why did she wait 31 days to report her daughter missing?

Now that the trial is over and she is not guilty, who did it?

Will Casey look for the "real" killer or killers like O.J. did?

I think the whole thing is a shame.

A little girl is dead and justice has not been served.

George Vreeland Hill

Comments: 7

John Ware Jul 5, 2011, 5:44pm UTC

George: trials are not "zero sum games" like the stock market. Yes, she covered things up, but the prosecution did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt exactly what that was, which was their charter to do. So we know she covered "something" up. The prosecution's version of the "something" was missing some notable dotted "i's" and crossed "t's".

reply to this comment

Amber C. Jul 5, 2011, 6:17pm UTC

Long time no see!

I don't care what anyone says about reasonable doubt. Yes, that is how it works. But are they telling me there was actually a reasonable doubt? It doesn't say doubt, it says reasonable doubt. And I can't think of a reasonable one that would have let her off.