The legality of the issuance of body armors such as bulletproof vests is dictated the jurisdiction of the state law and other government law-enforcement agencies. With the recent rise of urban conflicts, protective bulletproof clothing has offered a wearable and affordable kind of confidence and security. In a world, dominated by a growing lack of respect, appropriate solutions are required. A lack of inadequate personal safety measures can put a lone worker or frontline operative at unnecessary risk, and cause unacceptable injury or harm. Body armour and stab vests have therefore regrettably become a necessity within a number of domestic frontline professions.
These protective products are used by the police, army and private security companies in over 35 countries together with the South African Army, South African Navy, Irish Military, Indonesian Military, Armed Forces of Malta, Chilean Armed Forces, Dutch Special Forces, Thailand Navy and US Military; and a number of police forces within the UK and US as well as the South African Police Companies, Turkish National Police, Saudi Arabia Police, Oman Police, German Police, Belgian Police and Bermuda Police. Navy body armour is offered in a multitude of configurations: ballistic, stab resistant, twin objective fragmentation resistant and flotation. They're produced from quite a lot of ballistic materials, including: woven and unidirectional (defend) aramid and high performance polyethylene. The outcome is of great relevance to the question: 'Body Armour - Why?' The main risks areas highlighted by the HSL are as follows: Special Forces have the same questions. - Visiting people in their home or office to enforce legislation, police the system or having to give bad news. - Certain geographical areas or trouble spots are high risk, such as poor or run down council estates. - Dealing with certain high risk individuals, such as potentially violent or aggressive members of the public, drug users or dealers, or mentally ill individuals.
Dealing with frustrated and disappointed customers (e.g. customers unhappy with the service your organisation has provided) - Working late at night. - Evicting people from their home. - Visiting clients in unfamiliar industrial and domestic premises. - Visiting unoccupied buildings Several more reasons can be highlighted, making a decision not to issue potentially life saving body armour or stab vests even more controversial. Corporate manslaughter and corporate homicide laws as well as health & safety regulations have been rewritten in countries around the world, in order to protect those who serve and risk their lives for others. The cost of facing potential legal action after a fatal or non-fatal incident and the cost of injured employees taking time off would outweigh the one-off cost of body armour. Assaults on personnel who are not wearing protective clothing also create bad publicity for the Authority concerned, not to mention the welfare of the person involved and operational problems resulting from the injured staff being incapable to work.
In 2003 the UK's Health and Safety Laboratory developed 18 case studies and approached over 400 organisations of various sizes and across a range of different occupations. Very detailed questionnaires were sent and interviews were conducted by the HSL with the selected organisations and the information which they provided formed the basis of these widely respected case studies. Yes, 'perception' is one of the most prominent issues within personal safety, and I significantly agree with the fact that overt body armour can often be perceived as very confrontational in a Defence Forum, especially when dealing with intoxicated members of the public or those who seriously dislike authority, your organisation or presence to begin with. For me, lone workers dealing with the public should be doing their utmost to express themselves as peaceful ambassadors within their line of work. Only covert body armour allow them to do exactly that, whilst still being protected. Physique armour is mostly developed in quite a few designs and configurations. A number of the most advanced armour options have been developed and can be found for each the female and male kinds and embrace formed choices for max protection and comfort.
This article explores the assorted sorts of body armour available today. Continue reading beneath to study more about how they're used. General goal protecting vests are designed as a fundamental armour vests for the Police and private safety companies. They provide entrance, back and facet ballistic protection. Concealable Vests have been designed to observe the contours of the physique and provide entrance, again and aspect ballistic protection. High visual operations clothes have been designed to be used by personnel who need to be simply recognized equivalent to site visitors police. Police Assault Vests are designed for over-the-uniform put on, providing full front, again, facet, neck and shoulder ballistic protection. They're usually used by Police, Navy and Particular Forces.
Military Assault vests are designed to be excessive-mobility entrance opening vests and are to be worn over a soldier’s uniform. They normally have entrance, back, aspect and shoulder ballistic safety; with ballistic collar and throat protector, and detachable groin protector. Demining Vests have been especially designed for deminers and specialists in the Military and Police who search for mines and explosives. These vests are designed to provide the maximum potential protection against fragments and explosions from detonating mines.
They supply front, again and facet fragmentation protection; with removable groin protectors. Demining Aprons are also especially designed for deminers and specialists within the Army and Police who search for mines and explosives. These suits are designed to offer the maximum possible safety against fragments and explosions from detonating anti-personnel mines. IED search suits are particularly designed for specialists in the Military and Police who seek for Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs).
These suits are designed to supply full body safety against fragments and explosions. Armour plates are usually constructed from high-efficiency metal, ceramic and lightweight polyethylene armour plates, designed to fit all these vests and supply protection towards high-velocity weapons, masking NIJ Level III and IV (armour piercing). The fact of the matter is that there is always an 'unknown' level of risk due to unforeseen circumstances. Ordinary risk assessments might often conclude in the verdict of 'low risk', however these often very basic risk assessments are based on technical facts or 'on-hand information' only, and while I appreciate them, they often do not go beyond these facts.
A risk assessment dealing with the activity of a lone worker having to enter someone else's property or deal with customers or clients on a one-to-one basis can in my opinion, never ever result in low risk. Whenever a lone worker walks through someone's door or deals with often unfamiliar members of the public at another location, one can simply not know who else will be in the house, who else might enter the house at a later point, what activities have taken place prior to your colleagues visit or who else might be going to interfere or engage in their conversation or argument at a later point.
If you were driving a Rsu car and your petrol light comes on, indicating you only have a small amount of petrol left. What would you do? Would you start thinking: Will I make it home or not? Some people would be willing to take the risk in this situation. In the workplace though, in my view, it is the duty of the employer to not allow their employees to take unknown risks of their own accord with out the provision of equipment and training to protect them should they make a mistake in their own judgement. 'Better safe than sorry' and 'Prevention is better than cure' are two great sayings, making more sense within corporate health & safety than any where else.
I hope you would stop and get some fuel, because you want to be on the safe side. You might have made it, but you didn't want to take that risk. The bottom line is you cannot afford to break down. The fact that a lone workers activity involves a rather 'unknown risk' must urge key decision makers to remain at least open minded when it comes to body armour or additional lone worker safety training that can be made available. Supporting body armour does not mean we suggest you are in danger, we simply say that you will have a increased chance of remaining unharmed in the unlikely, but possible, case of something going wrong. Wearing personal protective equipment can be compared to wearing a seat belt when driving a car. We do not put the seat belt on because we believe we are going to have an accident today. We are simply acknowledging the fact that there is an exceptionally small chance that we might crash. Yet, if this chance becomes reality, you have increased the chance of survival by wearing a seat belt.END AKISMET -->
This article has been flagged as spam, if you think this is an error please contact us.