Here's what the NEA says:
NEA General Counsel, Bob Chanin, July 2009
"It is not because we care about children. And it is not because we have a vision of a great public school for every child. NEA and its affiliates are effective acvocates because we have power. And we have power because there are more than 3.2 million people who are willing to pay us hundreds of millions in dues."
Don't believe it? Watch this video: Great new ad exposing unions and Obama
Confused about collective bargaining? Watch this video: Collective Bargaining 101
Still need more information? Check this out: Explaining What's Wrong With Public Sector Unions
Don't let "them" tell you that they're the peaceful ones.
Live Ammo Was Found Outside the Capitol in Wisconsin
Wisconsin Protesters Caused More Than $7 Million in Damages to the Capitol
Collective bargaining on a broad scale is more similar to an antitrust violation than to a civil liberty. Why are the unions so willing to show their bad side?
And, they'll pay big bucks to see that Obama gets re-elected.
What's happening here is that the union sees its position threatened -- it is accustomed to helping elect Democrats who care a lot less about taxpayers than about unions, and then sitting comfortably on both sides of the negotiating table.
Well Lookie There, The Union Backers (in Wisconsin) Lied - Here are Links to the Truth





Comments: 10
If you want your children or grandchildren to get the education they deserve you will have to put both time and money into our schools. I haven't had any children in school for years, but that hasn't stopped me from doing what I can for the children. Come on people step up to the plate!
Private schools can spend far less and get more done.
Personally, I think if teachers really cared about the kids they teach, they would have dumped unions long ago.
In Milwaukee, for instance, they average $56,000 plus benefits, which puts them at over $100,000. Meanwhile, the people in the private sector make $19,000 average or $46,000 as couples. And they don't have such wonderful benefits.
Teachers also only work 9-10 months per year, get a break in winter and summer. Most get 10-15 days sick time paid and they get 10-15 days vacation as well.
What has come to light in all of this is that in many parts of the country, they pay zero toward their own insurance benefits and pension plans.
It's no wonder cities, counties and states have no money!!!
Teachers have always worked long hours - grading papers, for instance. And most have spent their own money for things the school districts don't provide.
When I was a teen (and I graduated high school in 1970), I knew a couple who were both teachers in their late 20s. One evening, they were both grading papers around their dining room table and I asked if it didn't bug them that they spent so much time doing that. They both agreed that anyone who wants to teach has to understand that they will spend long hours grading papers and will probably spend some of their own money on supplies. Nothing has changed. Today, though, teachers think they're entitled to more because the unions tell them they are.
And yet, our scores compared to other countries keep declining.
If you figure their hourly wage, based on the hours they put in, they aren't even making minimum wage.
Private school teachers start at $16,000 to 18,000 and the cost of the sup-plies for their rooms is still paid by the parents with the MANY fundraisers held. I think public school funds could be used more efficiently, but I don't question the amount of dedication it takes on the teachers part to be in a classroom. Sure they know going in that they put in longer hours, and you say they only work 9-10 months a year. Most teachers in our local system have to spend part of their summer vacation setting up their rooms for the coming year, taking CEU courses, etc. I say KUDOS to our school teachers. As a volunteer I get to see the teaching experience without having to be financially effected by it.
I've known many teachers, including family members. None spent an entire summer setting up classrooms. They arrive a few days before the kids (and they left school for the summer a few days after the kids).
I've volunteered in schools as well. Yes, there are some dedicated teachers. But as the years go by, there are fewer and fewer of them and more and more of the "gimme" union members.
Sadie, I maintain that if teachers did care about students, #1 they wouldn't be in unions. #2 they would have fought for the kids, not for themselves. And in doing that, parents would have gladly seen that they got raises.
We've had numerous discussions here about budget problems, and discussions about closing one high school and making a super-high school, among other changes. No teachers ever showed up to discuss what might be best for our children. None even bothered to write letters to the editor when there were weekly discussions in the paper pro and con about the various topics. But we did hear about their displeasure with maybe losing their jobs if one of the schools closed. Not one ever talked about what might or might not be good for the kids. Some dedication.
How have you been?