Even though she apologized, Dr. Laura has gone on a verbose campaign touting about infringements on her right to "express herself." We all know what she said, and I don't want to debate that here, but I think Dr. Laura needs to review the tenants of the First Ammendment. Here's why:
Â
Here are five facts about Dr. Laura and the First Amendment:
• The First Amendment protects us from the government, and not from other Americans who disagree with what we have to say. “Congress shall make no law†— the first five words of the First Amendment — say it all: No government body can limit our rights to speak out. In this case, there’s no government action, just public outrage and pressure.
• Boycotts are also protected by the First Amendment. Dr. Laura complains about being “bullied†by those who might pressure her radio affiliates or advertisers, but boycotts are a time-honored use of the First Amendment to address perceived wrongs and have played a role in virtually every social movement in American history.
• Efforts to punish controversial speech comes from the right and the left. It’s true that liberal organizations are attacking Dr. Laura for use of the racial epithet, just as conservative organizations burned Dixie Chicks CDs when Natalie Maines told a London audience that she was embarrassed that President Bush came from Texas. Politicians and interest groups of all stripes consistently seek to limit the other side’s free speech.
• The marketplace of ideas and the marketplace are different things. We tend to take a romantic view of a nation in which we’re all free to speak, which thereby enriches “the marketplace of ideas.†In the marketplace, however, economic rules apply. Controversial comments can be rewarded with a growing audience or punished by unsettled advertisers. Speech is free; airtime is not.
• Dr. Laura’s First Amendment rights are alive and well. Although she’s leaving her radio show, she says she’ll continue to share her views through public speaking, TV interviews, in print, online, and in a new book due in January, all made possible by the First Amendment.
Â
Source: The First Ammendment Center









Comments: 24
And what might those be???
Bad logic, bad advice, bad language, and a bad result for her.
Open mind, William??? I've heard enough of her offensive rants, yeah, to condemn them. I'm certainly not going to make excuses for her stupidity.
Thanks for posting this to 4 US, World News & Opinions.
I didn't like her, so I didn't listen to much she said. Period. Never felt the need to condemn, just turned the channel