PERSONAL VALUES TEST

DEGREE UPGRADING

1. The objective of the strategy- to challenge a person psychologically, to shock, to make "open" subconsciously stored negative experiences making them extremely detectible.

2. The scale of the undervalues, socially marked and unacceptable:

+ Positives ........................................ - Negatives

3. Axiomal acceptance of the character's possibly existing positive values and their exclusion from the Test.

4. Constructing a socially unacceptable scale of negatives to label and oust a personality from a possible/projected competition to shock, to deminish, to reject, to put at ease, to humiliate.

* examples of negatively marked undervalues scale ( an illegal, unlicensed monitoring/lie-detecting):

I. Law persecuted group

* theft

*unlawful estrangement

* antisocial activities...

II. Morally rejected group

* sexual orientation

*psychological/and moral disbalance

*social unimportance

*adultery

* abuses

*dishonesty...

III. Professionally outscored group

*incompetence

*untrustworthiness

*unfit

*unproductive

*underqualification/overqualification

IY. CONCLUSIVE

* a "nobody" labelling.

5. Trying to question the possibly existing positive characteristics by:

a/ an open question"Are you ...?" ;

b/ by a harsh shock-aimed uncompromising statements "You are ..." ;

c/ investigating and collecting evidence and testimonies to shock and to accept the unwanted.

6. Registering psychologically analysed external physiological reactions" and "documenting" them.

7. Opening an antipersonal campaign:

a/ on a "piece-of-news" level ( narrating about the noticed) - creating a pattern of negative characteristics of a rejected/to-be-rejected;

b/ on a lying and slandering level: usage of the statement "all know that"//"even Mr/Miss/Mrs X said that".

8. Ruining a community or a social image (Time frame = time x times of the lie pronounced/slander repeated).

9. Putting the unwanted into a below socially accepted/ recognizable position.

10. The "collecting point": gaining benefits, profits and favors for the social damage of the person's image or for its ruin /or for its social "annihilation".

POSSIBLE WAYS TO FIGHT:

1. inter-personal;

2. community engaged;

3. social activities;

4. networking.

Ivan Petryshyn