It's no wonder Perez Hilton was once punched by will.i.am of the Black Eyed Peas. It's clear Perez does stuff just to put down celebs in order to get his web blog more traffic. Perez makes a good bit of money doing so each month, but when he Twitters a Miley Cyrus upskirt photo, he truly goes overboard. Just recently the celebrity blogger presented a video of himself on his website PerezHilton.com addressing his Miley Cyrus controversy. (see video here at Perez TV!)
Perez appears on camera in what looks like Eskimo garb with no pants on himself. Perez talks about posting a photo of Miley Cyrus without underwear on. Perez adds that he calls her "Sl--ty Cyrus" but Miley would know better than to go out in public like that. I hope Perez knows better than to go out in town looking like a blue clown or looking like the mother of one of Willy Wonka's Oompa Loompas. Wait nevermind!
Perez asks if people think he's stupid enough to post such a photo (stupid yes, hopefully not that stupid though). He said he likes to be controversial but doesn't want to go to jail. He adds that if you look at the entire set of Miley Cyrus photos you'll notice she is clearly wearing panties. Perez said he linked to the photos because he thought "she was exiting the car in a very unladylike fashion" and he wants to help her be more ladylike. Interesting explanation Perez, but Miley's got a dad. Maybe Billy Ray can bring Perez to the UFC Octagon or WWE ring and settle this whole controversy though.
During his video explanation the camera continually shows shots of Perez's legs and crotch area, most likely in order for Perez to make a statement. Let's hope Miley presses charges against him for this "indecent exposure video" which is directed at her and everyone who shamed Perez for what he did.
Check out the video here at Perez TV, if you dare. Do you think Perez Hilton's Miley Cyrus upskirt photo apology is excusable? Should he be held liable criminally for anything? And do you think this all hurts or helps Miley - or Perez?