I just read a short article about the Vatican declaring...
"...bishops and other church officials should report clerical sex abuse to police if required by law."
The word that struck me was IF. IF? IF? Really? Why not, they have to report it, PERIOD?! Why is it ANY kind of POSSIBLE choice? Why is protecting PEDOPHILIC priests more important than protecting INNOCENT children? Isn't that what they're SUPPOSED to do? I really didn't think they could sink any lower...











Comments: 39
"Civil law concerning reporting of crimes to the appropriate authorities should always be followed."
But much more significantly, a 2001 order from Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (now Pope Benedict XVI) ordered bishops to deal with sexual abuse cases in secret. The Vatican denies tthat the 2001 directive prevented church officials from turning cases over to police when warranted.
The church further claims that the mandate to report crimes is not new, although they admit that it was not explicitly stated previously.
But critics claim that it has not been followed in many cases, and wasn't even the understanding of church officials who had to deal with the victims, according to Richard Sipe, a former priest.
These people all think by being religious they can do what they want, confess, do 5 hail mary's and go out and sin against children again and again!
Anything short of total reporting all "incidents" will leave them with a big credibility problem.
Please keep posting to our group and ask others to join.
When you think what would Jesus do...he was kind to the children but that did NOT include molestation!
As for Jesus, I think even He might set aside his "turn the other cheek" attitude for a minute.