This is a companion to a previous post (real time texting during the assault) on the Ft. Hood massacre and indicates the truth is still out there. It ain't over until all the information is released. Don't ya just hate it when I can SMELL conspiracy?
****
Â
OBAMA COVER UP OF FT. HOOD MASSACRE
By NWV News writer Jim Kouri
November 14, 2009
[NewsWithViews.com participated in a press teleconference regarding the attack on Fort Hood and its aftermath.]
A ranking US congressman said that he is concerned that President Barack Obama and his administration is being less than forthcoming with details of the Fort Hood Massacre and is withholding requested information.
U.S. Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-MI), the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, claims that the Obama administration may be restricting the dissemination of information and limited information provided so far to the so-called "Gang of Eight."
Congressman Hoekstra, following up on multiple conversations with the Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair, requested that Blair and the heads of the FBI, the NSA and the CIA direct their agencies to preserve all documents and materials relevant to the Fort Hood attack and any related investigations or intelligence collection activities.
In the past, Hoekstra strongly criticized rogue CIA employees that a CIA Inspector General's report concluded had attempted to block congressional and federal investigations into the agency's role in the shoot-down of a plane carrying the Bowers family of Muskegon, Michigan.
"I have requested this information be preserved because I believe members of the full committee on a bipartisan basis will want to scrutinize the intelligence relevant to this attack, what the agencies in possession of that intelligence did with it, who was and wasn’t informed and why, and what steps America’s intelligence agencies are taking in light of what they know," Hoekstra said.
"President Obama said people should not jump to conclusions about what happened at Fort Hood, but the administration is in possession of critical information related to the attack that they are refusing to release to Congress or the American people," Hoekstra said.
recommend
Facebook
Twitter
bookmark 
print
Comments: 55
Remember, though, we are ALL homegrown terrorists who don't agree with the govt. They passed the bill on Homegrown Terrorists. Oh, they can listen to everything we say too SOOOOOOO, HOW did they miss this?
Well, now that YOU mention it! LOL
By the way......2000 patients being seen right now at the FREE clinic in N O that we Keith Olbermann's 'horrible' viewers raised 1.5 MILLION dollars to sponsor. You should check it out..............or you could just go to FOX and see what they are SELLING you this morning.
Not sure where the clinic is, APE. There have been FREE clinics like this by the hundreds across the U.S. Many are available ALL the time.
This is what we should do, allowed to keep our own money to support charity, not entitlements.
The investigation is ongoing. Obama requests theatrical sluts like Hokestra not victimize the families of the victims OR the military itself by engaging in callous RW partisan theater to make crazies like you salivate over some half-assed allegation of "government cover up."
Never ceases to amaze the absolute, astounding level of shamelessness of the RW. Amazing.
Therefore, you put this garbage out there to earn gather points and spread your point of view, as you should. I support your right to free speech. My response is that i think you are wrong and that agenda will not work on the American people, but I support your right to claim and make your case.
The World Net Daily reported Hasan served on Obama’s transitional team. If the word “terrorist†is used it would mean that all the “make nice†that Obama has tried to do with the Muslims since he’s been elected has been to no avail.
“If you unclench your fist, we’ll open our arms. We have done things in the past as a country that we are in the process of correcting†and then he proceeded to list what he perceived as America’s evil deeds as he praised the historical contributions the Muslims have made to the world.
…we were told the President would be having a news conference shortly…so when he walked to the podium we were expecting to hear a very saddened president speak to us about the massacre but he rambled on and on amidst applause even getting Dr. Joe Medicine Crow’s award wrong.
Obama himself awarded Dr. Joe the Medal of Freedom (for civilians) but Obama said it was the Congressional Medal of Honor (for military) What was going on??
You can read the rest HERE Richard & Sam & APE.
So, before you jump on Hoekstra's "They're hiding the truth!" bandwagon, do a little thinking, eh?
This guy may well have been part of a plot or at least a conspirator with some terrorist group... OR he may have been totally a self-motivated Muslim shooter, acting totally on his own. I wouldn't expect to see much from the Justice Department, Military Intelligence or any other investigating group until they sort THAT one out.
Oh, and BTW - "Everybody knows that..." doesn't constitute actual EVIDENCE in criminal court.
They had two others in custody but quickly released them - NO INFO released yet.
ONE and now TWO police officers are credited with shooting him, yet NEITHER one know who did for sure (the officers themselves stated this on a live interview) - what the heck?
REAL time bloggers and eyewitnesses news reports state there were OTHER shooters involved.
Were there TWO handguns AND an assault rifle OR just one or the other?
He took time to reload - no one strong enough or quick enough to tackle him? Surely there were brave men there who would have charged him while he was shooting. They do that in war all the time. BUT, if multiple shooters, that WOULD explain the massacre.
All "targets" happened to be in FRONT him - none behind?
Shootings at TWO different buildings?
Are they in custody too?
If not, why not release their names so they can tell the American people (or at LEAST Congress) what they know/knew/saw/did.
Obama can't have this as a terrorist attack. It reflects on him, as Commander and Chief, as a failure. It would confirm Cheney's assertions, and they can't have that now can they...
Bush was able to nip an attack back in 2003, I believe.
Funny thing is, we had an alert here and the border patrol was all over the place stopping cars and doing checks. So something was up. Sorry, I was not privy to details, but the alert was up the day before the shooting.
I'd also read they wanted to get hold of cars which may have sustained bullet holes during the attack so they could hold to the "official" story. Whether it was two hand guns or one assault riffle. They want to cover all their bases.
From what I saw, every car was being checked. I didn't see any FBI, just local, State and Borders.
I'm just saying... They already charged him with 13 counts of murder - that sounds line "hard" evidence. It's NOT evidence, hard or otherwise. It's a charge. No grand jury, no preliminary hearing, no evidentiary hearing, nothing but first-person statements that this guy was the shooter. BTW, I just HATE the responsibility ducking phrase, "I'm just saying..."
They had two others in custody but quickly released them - NO INFO released yet. No indication they were involved. They were the closest people to him who DIDN'T get shot. Besides, they're both soldiers. The Army knows where they live.
ONE and now TWO police officers are credited with shooting him, yet NEITHER one know who did for sure (the officers themselves stated this on a live interview) - what the heck? I don't understand your question. Two police officers emptied their sidearms in the general direction of the shooter. I GUARANTEE you, neither of them know who hit what. Most of their shots hit nuthin' but wall.
REAL time bloggers and eyewitnesses news reports state there were OTHER shooters involved. Uh-huh. And your point? "REALtime bloggers, and any OTHER kind of eyewitness in the middle of that is about as reliable as a two-year-old. EVERYbody panicks. BTW - I said somethin above about conflicting information?
Were there TWO handguns AND an assault rifle OR just one or the other? Well now, I don't know... but I'll bet the investigators have a pretty good idea by now. That's just basic stuff (How many weapons did you pick up off the floor? Whose prints were on 'em?). We'll know eventually, but for now, it's enough that the investigators know.
He took time to reload - no one strong enough or quick enough to tackle him? Surely there were brave men there who would have charged him while he was shooting. They do that in war all the time. BUT, if multiple shooters, that WOULD explain the massacre. You cannot be serious! In an enclosed building with tables, chairs and I don't know WHATALL, you think people are gonna do anything but duck and cover? Semi-automatic pistols re-load in less than a second if you practice (I might still be able to do it. By the time you decided to move, he'd be shooting again. Yeah, people do it in battle. A little Texas kid named Audie made a regular HABIT of it. Most folks only got to do it once.
All "targets" happened to be in FRONT him - none behind? When you walk through a door, EVERYBODY is in front of you.
Shootings at TWO different buildings? Sure. Buildings are very close to each other on a military reservation. And leaving a building and entering another might take only a second or two..
This means as much to the public has a right to know, just hold your horses just one damn minuet. I ask for patient, and it is required of all of us to get all of the facts straight first.
Until then, those President Obama haters need to sit down and shut up, and take a ticket. But then, I would except nothing less from the right wing at the time than to behave the way they are doing so right now, selfishly trying to score political point where none exist. But then, they are of the Dark Side and they never sleep.
I know you worship something or somebody, but that's not at issue here. You are supporting and promoting false claims that you have attributed to President Obama. But lies is what you are about so nothing really changes with you. Individual, group conspiracy any way you look at it you ranting does nothing. So what would like for the government to do, besides locking up all of the Muslims or everybody carrying their side-arms at the ready? In an open democracy such as ours, mass killing can and has taken place, and will continue to occur thats has been the American history since the beginning. So I wait for you to prove something anything. But then living in fear is your cup of tea.
Regardless, charging a cover up without providing any details is a cheap rhetorical flourish.
Does anybody remember when the small plane carrying Congressman Begich and House Majority Leader Hale Boggs crashed in Alaska? they never found the wreckage, and some say that they didn't try very hard.
http://www.check-six.com/lib/Famous_Missing/Boggs.htm
~~~
Just foot soldiers for the, wrap my self in the Stars and Stripes crowd, who have never, I repeat never worn the uniform to defend this country and support the use of torture as an instrument of warfare. That my friend means he support war criminals, and would lock away a person without due processes of person answering to charges against them, that is the fascist state I referring to.
Oh it's not easy, nor is safe to be in open democracy, with people walking around with different ideas in their heads than you. Or worship differently than you do, vote differently than you do and look differently than you do.
Oh but my friend, I defend the weak, the poor, the soldier, the smart, the gay, the straight, the differences in our society and the more the merry. America isn't stagnant nor will it ever be, nor do I care tto live in place where it was better back when. I good right now and getting better. However, others would have you to believe in doom and gloom and want you to live in fear. Not me.
Why do you have a book publish or a PhD. at the end of your name
Linda, I saw on the news where Obama doesnt want the shootings to be made political... Why, wouldnt it be political? Terrorists, hate the USA... plain and simple or will he be saying he is sorry, to the terrorists for the not so politically correct in this country...
We can see how much a threat the Terrorist networks look at anyone supported by the Democrats, they pick up their activity.