So many people blame insurance companies for the majority of health care problems. They fail to see that people are to blame for much of what has transpired with health care.
Insurance companies used to be there for just the big things, and they very rarely denied anything. Then some not-so-bright people decided that insurance should cover everything. Why? Why should insurance cover every doctor visit and every prescription? We should be able to afford to see a doctor or buy a prescription. Taking care of our health should be just as important as having shelter and food on the table and we should be responsible enough to provide those for ourselves and our families. Insurance costs increased when they had to start covering everything. And the costs of doctor visits and tests increased when they were being covered by insurance, since they have to wait for payment.
Back when my son was a baby, insurance didn't cover everything. It didn't cover "well baby visits", for instance. And, back then, each visit had to be paid by the patient (or parents) and they were responsible for submitting paperwork to insurance companies for reimbursement. With that system, the patient could - and did - argue with doctors about what tests or treatments were necessary.
Today, people don't much care about what the costs are, as long as their insurance company is paying for them. Doctors have had to raise their rates because they often have to wait as much as 6 months for payment from the insurance companies. (The reasons for that length of time vary and are often the fault of the doctor's staff because of coding incorrectly, or even - something I've experienced - having the doctor's office staff submit to the wrong insurance company.)
I have rarely had an insurance company deny anything. When my son was always so sick as a baby, I used to have to submit bills for repayment with long explanations about the fact that while the original appointment was for a well baby visit, it was also discovered that he had a fever again and needed medication. With the explanation, they would agree to cover part of the visit.
More recently, I did have the insurance company try to deny a prescription. But once I explained that the reason it was so soon since the last time I ordered that medication was that the dosage had been increased, they approved the expense.
I've had more problems with doctor's offices than with insurance companies.
Not long ago, my doctor's office denied a prescription that I take regularly. At first, I figured it was because they thought I was due for a visit to the doc, although it hadn't been that long since I was there. Instead, I discovered that they "had heard" that I had moved to another city 3+ hours away and figured I needed to find a doctor in that city. I don't know where they got that erroneous information. But once it was cleared up, they approved the prescription refill.
I've been battling with a collection agency about a bill that doesn't belong to me. They claim that I need to talk to the doctor's office. The doc's office claims that it's out of their hands. Neither one is going to make me pay for service that was not rendered. (It's for a bill that says I saw this doc in August of last year, when the last time I saw him was in February of last year.)
I don't need the government to help me with these problems. And I have never needed the government to help me see a doctor either.
As I've shared before, I was raised to know that my health was important and that I should budget for both insurance and for seeing a doctor on a regular basis, right along with budgeting for paying rent/mortgage and for food. Going into adulthood with that knowledge meant that when I sought a job, I always sought one with good insurance benefits. And it meant that when insurance benefits were not available, I realized that I must set aside money from every pay check for "contingencies" - like seeing a doctor. To me, that was just part of being a responsible adult.
I also knew that if something happened and I could not meet these adult responsibilities, that there were programs available to me.
I knew there were free clinics all over the country. Yes, they are a pain in the butt to visit since you can wait for hours. Yes, sometimes you're looked down upon by employees there. And yes, sometimes they're a bit of a drive from where one lives. But they exist.
I also knew that non-profits and churches offer assistance to people who need medical care.
And I knew that drug companies have always had programs to help people who cannot afford their prescriptions.
I also discovered that in some towns there are medical studies and drug trials going on that one can get in on. In one town where my son and I lived, there was a research facility directly across the street from us. When I had bronchitis, they were having a study. When my son had the flu, they were having a flu study. And when I entered menopause, they were having a study about that. In each case, we received free medical care, free prescriptions, and we got paid for our visits as well.
I was talking about all of this to one of my online acquaintances, and she admitted that finding programs like this was just too much work. She would much rather let the government take care of everything for her.
And so it is, I think with so many today. The easiest solution to everything is to let the government take care of it. Every time we give them that ability, we lose one more piece of our freedom. People today are giving up more and more freedoms willingly.
Some of us want to remain free. Some of us don't want the government to stick their noses in our health care.
Hopefully, there are more of us than of those who want to be chained to the government.


Comments: 29
The patient works for an employer who purchases insurance that pays bills generated by a provider's staff.
Yes, it was government insurance. How awful! LOL
Insurance today would be much cheaper if it only covered the big things. But that would mean that people would have to learn to be responsible for everything else. And we know that people think that's what the government is for now. Sad.
I had written an article about this, shortly before I learned that Rob Appell had passed away. I'm probably not going to publish that article, because by arguing with you, all I am doing is adding to your cause. I will say this much, and that it is something I have said before. Your position on medical insurance is very much an "anti-Golden Rule" position. You have something and you don't want the other person to have it, because you are afraid what you will have is less.
BTW, yesterday one of your TN politicians was back on talking about how
TNcare cannot continue because it's broke.
As far as some TN lawmaker saying Tenncare is going broke, they have been saying that since I have lived here (14 years). In just the last five years, the coverage under various state-run medical plans has expanded.
No, Marilyn, not all will suffer if this plan goes through (which it is looking like it will). YOU will suffer because you think hubby is going to have to pay more taxes.
Of course, you could always trade in hubbies. LOL
If this plan goes through, I sincerely hope that ALL people end up paying more in taxes, including those on fixed incomes. That's how it works in other countries with socialized medicine. And that's how it should work here. There are no free lunches.
Tsk, tsk, Marilyn. It's not good to wish harm on another person. It always comes back to you.
And THEN tell them that you want them to "be responsible." Should we be like you've been responsible?
I'm not sure why that link isn't showing up...
"Coping With, and Without, Insurance"
This is exactly why the government program is not good for us - because people think that someone else should take care of them....and that since the government is going to do it they won't ever have to worry about costs again. WRONG.
All indications are that costs will go up under the proposed plan. And someone will have to pay for that. We're all going to have worse care for more cost because people don't know how to take care of themselves.
The government would be better off spending some money to teach people to be responsible.
But they don't want to do that. They love the idea that another aspect of our lives will now be under their control.
In case you haven't noticed, there is already a fair number of American people who are already on Medicaid or Medicare and they essentially have their treatment in the hands of the government already. And private insurance is already heavily government regulated, as are the providers.
I don't even know why I bother trying to explain this to you. I know you know better. I know you were scared to death when you were living in TX and could not work due to a work related injury and you couldn't get the proper physical therapy, or whatever it was that you needed. I am absolutely flabbergasted that you cannot feel for people who are in the very same situation you were a few years ago.
As far as educating people to be responsible, if the government took over THAT project, not doubt you'd find fault with that.
k, I've seen government programs and how they are not trustworthy - from Medicaid and Medicare and the VA system, to state-run programs. Why in the world ANYONE wants the government running their health care is beyond me.
Except that....liberals believe the government should be in charge of everything.
Bologna butts!
I have dental insurance. I pay about $40/mo for it, and it only covers a maximum of $1700/yr. in benefits...and most things it pays 50% for.
So, when one has bad teeth (like me), and little coverage (again like me) one must get creative.
I negotiated on services, and prices, with my dentist, and will now have all my dental needs taken care of between October '09 and January '10. I had to spread it out for two reasons - 1. my portion is significant, and will require payments being made to the dentist, and 2. my annual dental coverage renews in January.
I'm not rich, by any stretch of any imagination, but I am intelligent and resourceful.
WE the People don't need a nanny state. Period.
We just decided that we might drop some of our coverage - vision, for instance - because we don't like that it doesn't cover ophthalmologists, but we can see ophthalmologist via our medical insurance. So what's the use of having the vision insurance? It only covers certain places for getting glasses and contacts, too - the expensive places and we pay a portion. Or I can go to Sears or JC Penney and get $99 glasses. A no brainer, I think.
I am constantly amazed at the laziness of people, in general, these days.
I think that laziness plays a huge role in the fact that people want the government to do for them. There have always been ways to get seen by a doctor. I discovered that when I was a single mom without insurance. But expecting the government to do everything for me is not how I was raised.
And, what they don't have are the corrupt people we do in Washington. Do you really want those crooks in charge of your health? I certainly do not.
Have you read what they're proposing? Do you really want that much control to be out of your hands and into the government's?
As I've said before - and provided links in the past - the comparisons between socialized medicine and our (halfway) free market care are not good ones, William. It's like comparing apples and oranges.
A much better model, by the way, is in Singapore, where they have harmonized nationalized health care and free market care better than anyone. Too bad there are not any specials about that.