An economy that isn't creating employment opportunities simply isn't doing its job.
It's time to stop glorifying our economic doldrums with this "jobless recovery" nonsense.
Yes, the economy did grow in the third quarter, for the first time in a year. Fewer Americans are filing new claims for unemployment insurance, and giant financial institutions appear less apt to collapse and send us into another stupor. The stock market has recovered much of its winter decline.
But so far there is no sign of an employment turnaround -- and without one, and soon, all the other gains could prove fleeting.
The U.S. has lost jobs in 22 straight months, and Friday's news that 10.2% of the labor force is out of work -- the highest reading since 1983 -- shows just how far we have to go.
Without better job prospects, the consumers whose spending makes up the lion's share of economic activity will remain tightfisted. That will slow the healing of deep wounds in the housing and financial markets.
"To have a real recovery you need to put people to work," said John Harrington, who runs Harrington Investments, a socially responsible asset management firm in Napa, Calif. "Right now we aren't doing that."
The term jobless recovery was used mostly as a pejorative when it came into circulation in the 1990s. But in the wake of last year's meltdown, it has taken on a new sense: If you give it time, economic growth will come. That has been the mantra throughout 2009.
Yet Friday's headline unemployment number was worse than economists expected, and it wasn't the only bad news. The average workweek remains short by historical standards -- suggesting many employed people are working fewer hours than they'd like. People are staying unemployed longer and losing their benefits, in spite of recent government action to extend them.
A short work week isn't just a sign of distress for cash-strapped workers. It also says it will be some time before employers start hiring again.
"Particularly with future uncertainty as high as it is, firms are more likely to increase the hours of underemployed workers before hiring unemployed workers," wrote Janney Montgomery Scott economist Guy LeBas in a note to clients Friday.
Because output fell so sharply following the oil shock and Lehman Brothers collapse of 2008, some pundits are banking on a sharp rebound.
But job and wage growth have been weak for a decade. Total private sector employment has dropped since the Yankees held their previous victory parade, in 2000.
That means there has been no net private sector job growth over a nine-year span where the U.S. population expanded by 11%, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
0:00 /3:44GDP turnaround unstable
Meanwhile, financial institutions remain unhealthy, with 140 banks having failed since the start of 2008. The few that seem to have avoided the worst hits, such as Goldman Sachs (GS, Fortune 500) and JPMorgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500), have made a mint on their trading desks -- which thickens traders' wallets but doesn't do much for those seeking credit to start or expand a business.
"All that stuff just adds to the speculation and the market volatility," said Harrington. "I'd like to see them do more things that actually add to the economy."
Another sign that the pain isn't about to disappear comes from Sean Bisceglia, CEO of TalentDrive, a Chicago-based job search technology startup.
He says almost half of the companies he surveyed in August and September either had cut their hiring budget or didn't have one. Bisceglia concedes that number is a "fungible" one and says he expects that hiring will pick up when the economic outlook improves.
But companies like Bisceglia's may be a reason why it will take so much longer for job growth to return. Better, more efficient technology is replacing workers in many industries. That is one reason productivity has been rising -- and why jobs have been harder to come by.
"A lot of companies are using technology to streamline the hiring process, and that can hold down the headcount even when things get better," said Bisceglia, whose company employs 16 people and hopes to add four positions next year. "We're just trying to ride that wave."
recommend this
email
print
link to this page
Comments: 25 ( 8 removed by Jack E. )
The economy for much of this decade has been overinflated, so getting back to that level of activity on a more or less sustainable basis. In other words, the employment picture won't be as rosy for quite a while.
I would rather see it sink the money into projects which generate real wealth. Build windmills of the coasts and solar panels in the deserts to generate renewable energy and jobs. Repair infrastructure, which again generates genuine wealth. Build oil refineries using modern technology so when one goes down we can pick up the slack.
The "cash for clunkers" program actually DOES generate wealth by decreasing out dependence on foreign oil.
Additionally how many formerly two income families have decided they can now get along on one income now that the house is paid off and the kids are out of school? If they became a one income family as the resurlt of one member getting laid off, I would be willing to bet that many of those laid-off workers will file for and collect unemployment until their benefits run out, particularly if they were members of a profession where the requirements for proving you are engaged in a job search is not that difficult as is the case where sending out a resumes in an attempt to get a interview is the first step in seeking employment.
The preceding doesn't negate the problem of a unemployment problem existing s it mere presented to provided examples of the difficulty in determining the number of persons who are still really seeking employment.
At some point unemployment will be the new normal.
America is in a very dad way and the public does not realise it yet because their is enough welfare to keep most people comfortable but soon the boon is going to be lowered.
In the mean time those businesses that actually create jobs and people continue to suffer while the Feds continue bailing out the same that caused the problem in the first place. I dunno.... something seems wrong here to me.
Pfizer which is in my state has moved to Europe and will finish closing their operation here by next summer and Pratt & Whitney is leaving soon also. That is the end of big business in my state unless you refer to communist supporters like Walmart.
Government has done nothing to stimulate the working public and has handed the last of our public wealth to corporate hacks that destroyed the economy.
CT still has Aetna, The Hartford, Stanley, Pitney Bowes, United Technologies, (Pratt and Whitney is under the umbrella of UT) Xerox, et al, and The Knights of Columbus has their International Headquarters there.