From what I've read on the gather forum many people tend to believe that their concept of god is limited to a concept of love. I have to ask myself why some people have a need to believe this? Since I can't fully answer this myself maybe you can explain.
Is it that some people have only grown in their understanding of existence up to the concept of love and can't see beyond their own limitations or is it that they have no real concept of god other than a man made ideology we call religions. Please don't bother quoting biblical references in response to this article because these are just written by a mortal man. They explain nothing beyond a faith based ideology.
Believing in a concept of god as the energy of life within a true to life context I can understand and agree with because this at least makes sense to me based on my own experiences. That this planet is a breeding ground for new life brought into existence is also easy to comprehend but why is this necessity of a faith based belief even a requirement?


Comments: 16
I feel no personal need for a god made in man's image, which is what I see when I encounter most Christian/Islamic/Jewish sects. Faith is of little value to me, as is belief for belief's sake or the concept of hope (though I have come to understand the concept of hope to the extent that it has inspired me to purchase two lottery tickets a week).
Religions do have value though, and depending on the religion, those values may outweigh any nasty side-effects (homophobia or holy war for example). I don't count Zen as a religion because it seems to acknowledge the world makes total sense and at the same time makes no sense at all. Many of us need a belief system that is more or less coherent within itself, by excluding contradictions coming from outside the system (such as women's apparent equality of intelligence and judgment with men - something that doesn't fit with some of these belief systems). A belief system can also help people with unsettling thoughts they may have (like lusting after a pretty girl or lacking any hint of love in one's heart or honestly wanting to kill someone). For my case, such thoughts are just thoughts, and I am responsible of deciding which of them I will act on. For others, a belief system may be necessary, and I'm okay with that unless it begins to intrude on my personal liberties; so, I'm okay with belief systems and I'm not okay with belief systems, meaning we're back to that Zen principle of everything/nothing again.
Those are my thoughts. I have more, but I need to cook breakfast. I did not check this for spelling or grammar.
Fact: without energy the universe could not exist!
Many people do not know how man first conceived God. This knowledge may be found in a book recently released and is available on amazon.com. For a quick read, enter a search on the Internet with the words: Future of God Amen If you wish to learn more about the book, you can visit two websites: www.futureofgodamen.com and, xlibris.com/ginex
The book was written to inform the public world-wide that it was the Egyptian civilization that first developed the concepts of a soul, a hereafter based upon living a moral and truthful life, a universal God, and a Son of God. It will help people to sort out their own thoughts in learning the beginning of the creation of God.
Nick Ginex - Knowledge is a wonderful gift.
No offence to anyone intended.
To honor, appreciate and respect one another is at least an attainable goal.
As to the so called word of god, all we have is a man made creation here.
We live in a physical world, yet Man had some sort of need to be grateful since early times. When the Sun rose and warmed the Earth, made the crops grow, turned the leaves green, he connected the Sun with this and so worshipped it when it was visible. In a sense, Man realised he was quite small and vulnerable in all this, could experience real danger with other animals around, looking to make sure their own territory was safe enough for them.
The concept of a 'god' is, i suppose, a manifestation of that need for reassurance. It is, however, an abstract idea, not provable in a logical sense but argued about often because, naturally, everone's experience of what they term is 'god' is going to be different.
The religious industry, composed of the self-appointed heirarchy, is there in order to perpetuate the stories which others in the past believed, were expected to believe, were forced to believe for fear of their lives. Nowadays, we are more able, in most communities, to question the beliefs of today and to research the beliefs of the past. Some people use their faith as a key to their lifestyle, which can be, in a sense, elitist; other branches of their own faith, or, indeed, other religions, have, in thier eyes, simply got it wrong. They choose not to see that Man created his 'god' in his own image.
The Romans, in history, had many gods for different parts of life. When it was decided that one was enough, I often wonder, in an ironic sense, where the redundant gods went?
The film
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNf-P_5u_Hw
explains in simple, easy to digest, researched, historically proven terms the process of the belief of Man in a 'god'. It is worthy of watching and noting.
Peace.
I'll check out the film on youtube, thanks.
In my view Rome condoned a murder and then proceeded to profit from it for centuries. You should be familar with this expression; "the victor writes the history". Thank you for commenting.
God is love and He loves you. He's been knocking at the door to your heart over the years and He's patiently waiting for you to let Him in. I know the feeling. I put Him off for 40 years. Since July 22, 2002, I have known a love and a peace that goes beyond explanation with FREEDOM and not dominance.
What I got on that wonderful night is available to everyone for Jesus is joyful when he finds lost sheep (see Luke 15:1-7). In reality, He's already found you (for He knew you before you were born) - it's up to you to accept Him. Believe me (and millions upon millions of others), it'll be the most wonderful event of your life.
To each their own though.