As usual this post, originally published at Boggart Blog is a bit late arriving at Gather.
Following the shock of last week’s announcement that the Nobel Peace Prize for 2009 had been awarded to Barack Obama in spite of nominations for the prize closing only a few days after he was inaugurated as President of the United States and the winner having been decided by the end of March, less than 13 weeks into his Presidency, many political leaders and pundits have written or spoken out in support of the award. Even the chair of the committee of international great and good that selects the winner has had to go public to explain that the award was made on the basis that Mr. Obama had brought hope to the world.
Hope. If we are awarding prizes for hope that should not the winners medal for the London Marathon be awarded to the obese guy who dresses as Donald Duck to take part every year? Surely he sets off with more hope than any other entrant.
Hope my arse. Hope is for losers, hope is what makes drowning men clutch at straws or the guy facing bankruptcy put on his lucky shirt and head for the casino to risk everything he has left on one last throw of the dice. Hope is what makes politicians talk of green shoots of recovery even as the currency exchange rate goes down the pan.
Hope is all the religious and superstitious nonsense in the world compressed into one four letter word. Hope is a four letter word. Hope is false, forlorn and misbegotten. The hope that springs eternal springs right up your behind.(1)
Hope is what remained cowering in the darkest corner of Pandora’s box when everything else had thrown caution to the wind and made the great leap into the unknown. Hope is the last refuge of those who cannot face reality. Hope is for fools.
Delve into literature and things are soon put in perspective:
Tomorrow and Tomorrow and Tomorrow
creeps in this petty pace from day to day
to the last syllable of recorded time.
And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
the way to dusty death…
Shakespeare, Macbeth, Act V Sc 5
Macbeth had not time for hope then, he faced the inevitable with grim resignation thus showing that all talk of hope is empty, we all end up at the same destination having tried vainly to be masters of our own destiny. So many people spend their time looking for, hoping for a Messiah who will save and protect them and lead them to a Utopian future in a magic land bathed in golden light. The wise few, meanwhile, are enjoying every moment of every day knowing we have all too few days left. Still even when our bodies become frail we can still laugh at the comical antics of the pompous fools who think their empty words and grandiose promises can fork some lightning (2) and change the nature of things.
“We are all in the gutter but some of us are looking at the stars,” said Oscar Wilde when he was looking at a stretch in Reading Jail. At least he understood that while we can look at the stars we can never touch them.
So where does hope stand in relation to reality. Shakespeare can guide us again when we are troubled about what the future may hold:
For who would bear the whips and scorns of time,
Th' oppressor's wrong, the proud man's contumely
The pangs of despised love, the law's delay,
The insolence of office, and the spurns
That patient merit of th' unworthy takes,
When he himself might his quietus make
With a bare bodkin? Who would fardels bear,
To grunt and sweat under a weary life,
But that the dread of something after death,
The undiscovered country, from whose bourn
No traveller returns, puzzles the will,
And makes us rather bear those ills we have
Than fly to others that we know not of?
Shakespeare: Hamlet, Act 3 Sc 1
Having clarified things in his mind with these words Hamlet decides “Thus conscience makes cowards of us all.” Hope is for cowards, those who fear death the great unknown more than they fear life. It is without a doubt nobler in the mind to take arms against an endless sea of troubles and by opposing end them than to sit in a dark corner of a little box holding hands with hope.
Hope strips us of all that is noble in humanity. Faced with an army of adversities I would rather stand my ground and shout "Come and have a go if you think you're hard enough," than cringe at the bottom of a hole and hope they pass me by. We all have a time for dying and all the hope in the world cannot save us from the inevitable.
A Saxon scribe recorded the words of one renowned warrior who said that we are all cowards, courage lies in having the will to overcome fear and face death joyously knowing we have done our best and could not possibly do more.
To me that beats listening to some preachy wuss wimping on about hope and singing Kumbaya while relying on divine intervention to save us from the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune.
The award of a Nobel Peace Prize to Obama because he “gave hope” is as ridiculous as giving Billy Graham an honorary doctorate in evolutionary science. Hope, by definition cannot be audacious. If hope is all we have to to beat off our endless sea of troubles then we have nothing.
So if you have been feeling let down by hope and can’t find the will to overcome adversity, embrace nihilistic despair as Macbeth and Hamlet did. The outcome will be the same but at least you will have expected nothing, thus you cannot be disappointed.
Oquotations not credited in main text:
(1) Ian Dury and the Bockheads
(2) Referring to but not quoting "Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night" by Dylan Thomas
Economy Of The Living Dead
Profitable Habits Of Self Help Gurus


Comments: 21
Those of us who have the hope/faith/belief thing mastered do not hope for the best we make it happen. Also I'm a bit puzzled by the phrase "hopeful frame of mind." Does this mean the happy frame of mind of somebody determined to make the best of whatever life throws at them, i.e. the copers, in life of those who see themselves as having no way of controlling what happe ns to them other than to rely on the help of supernatural forces. The latter are not copers.
As for how we can make sure of the best outcome it is first necessary to understand all aspects of the problem. Marcus Aurelius had some good advice to offer on that and it did not include faith or hope and only the belief that one is capable of dealing with any circumstance.
Possunt Quia Posse Videntur as my old school's motto goes (they can because they believe they can.)
This was my point, except I would prefer, "They can because they hope they can" or perhaps a hybrid, "They can because they expect they can." Maybe best is a quote from that great philsopher Watty Piper in his text The Little Engine That Could": "I think I can, I think I can..."
However...Despite your enviable ability to "make it happen," most of us do not control every circumstance in our lives (not do we care to). We therefore hope that those things beyond our control work out for the best.
I find a combination of both to be the most effective, Ian. Can one still not have hope whilst standing ground, shouting and taking action? I know I do. You seem to equate hope solely with weakness, inaction and cowardice. And in the cowering examples you provide, I would agree that to be the case. But, hope can also shore up the most determined of actions, too. Perhaps our definitions are different...translation and all. :)
p.s. I also just enjoy simply disagreeing with Ian. :) He is one of the few truly intelligent, witty folks still on Gather who also seems to capture my imagination.
Horatius and the Bridge, the battle of Thermpopylae. There is a great deal of wisdom in such myths. The important thing about standing one's ground is choosing where to stand.
Ooh you sweetie...XXX Are you free for dinner tonight?
I like to be controversial and go against the mainstream. Gather say "join the conversation" but if everyone agrees or else they just contradict each other it isn''t a conversation is it? Where's Aniko, we could use her here when I do my next thing which will be an exploration of human consciousness.
BTW The article above is basically a transcripts of the verbal reply I gave to a caller on a radio phone in. I've tidied it a bit and cut the few seconds waffle we always do to allow gathering of thoughts on the topic and then because the producer was signalling me not to let the guy talk (he had a really slow, weary voice) I launched.
Rush should be thanking whatever God he prays to I'm not American. Not only can I busk it off the top of my head as well as he can, I throw a bit of culture in too.
Howsomever, I agree with Chris B. and Sheryl O.
Hope is all some folk have.
"Strangely the Socialist Group in the European Parliament is alone in supporting the admission of Turkey, which is an Asian nation, into Europe. Obama told west European leaders some months ago he wanted Turkey in the EU. They told him to eff off and run his own country. Reports of Obama's popularity outside the USA and Africa are greatly exaggerated."
...Better from you than I
Thanks, I could have added O is only going to be popular in Africa til they find he has no money to give them. They're very cynical.
I didn't say religion was all superstitious nonsense, though I am not religious myself. There is superstitious nonsense in all religions though. Have you never known anyone who threw spilled salt over their left shoulder? That is religious nonsense.
And when I referred to Macbeth by name I was seriously tempting fate. It is bad luck to use the name of The Scottish Play." That is superstitious nonsense.
In those acts, throwing salt to blind the devil and not using a word to avoid bad luck we hope to asure success and good fortunte.
I was going to add that he's not all that popular in Africa either. Because of someone's attention to an African paper very recently, it aroused interest, and I've been paying more attention.
Had never heard of that MacBeth superstition. (Interesting trivia)
I did not tell it all. If the word Macbeth is uttered in a theatre the production, whatever it is, performance will be ruined by a mishap unless the person who said Macbeth turns round on the spot three times and spits.
In the theatre you alo never wish anybody "good luck" as it will bring the opposite. Instead they wish each other ill luck by saying Break A Leg. These things are usually joked about now but pre World War 2 they were still taken very seriously. Even so, when I spent a summer in NYS in 1966 and volunteered as a stagehand at the Warwick Theatre (a converted barn) although nobody admitted taking those things seriously if we amateurs had broken the rule our lives would not have been wrth living.