Recent article I published at Associated Content:
I read quite a bit awhile back about the 9/12 tea party, and most of it was arguing about insignificant things, such as how many people showed up. I don't care whether it was 60,000 in DC or 2 million; let's not get distracted by that.
The whole point is that we are about to finish destroying the greatest country on earth. Americans are beginning to realize what we are doing. Rightfully so, they are getting VERY ANGRY.
recommend this
email
print
link to this page
Comments: 34
Your article is spot on Matt!
That's an awesome quote from Daniel Webster. How true it is that those with good intentions to govern us still mean to be our masters.
Too many people forget that the Constitution is a limiting document and not an empowering document. It was written to limit government's ability to impose its will over the governed, not the other way around. The founders knew that if they implemented a government that worked too well, the freedoms that had been so recently fought for would be lost very quickly.
Well put! Thanks Dale!
I make a shade under 100 k and I got a huge tax cut.
Perhaps you folks who make so much money and are NOT covered by Obama's tax cut have something to gripe about. Me? I would love a bigger tax bracket because that would mean I would be making MORE $.
I would love to trade places with you millionaires even if it meant a higher tax bracket.
What makes you think we're rich? I'm just a college student, with very little spare cash.
Tax is an issue but there are other issues of equal or greater importance as well.
Taxes for everyone, the rich, the middle class, and the poor will be going up in the near future as a result of Bush's and Obama's massive spending.
Our grandchildren will pay off the debt, but Clinton left with a surplus. Imagine that! All that whining for nothing.
What's your point?
Obama and the CBO predict $9 trillion in additional deficit over the next 10 years. No surplus in sight.
BTW the only reason we had a surplus in the 90's is due to loose monetary policy, not because Clinton had great policy.
Also we're tired of "government by the bankers, of the bankers, and for the bankers"
I sure have.
"Money" is one thing.
Actual wealth (purchasing power) is another. Banker's changing the money supply does not change the amount of wealth in the country, it just transfers it from one pocket to another.
It's taxation without representation.
Money is inherently unfair. In fact it motivates us to be as unfair as we can. It makes us feel like enemies, opponents, rivals, and competitors when that is obviously untrue. Bankers just have a better position in the power struggle than most others. And, bankers "tax" in their way, calling it "interest" and "fees" but they provide nothing in return.
You're right, and that's what I was saying.
Republicanvilles, shanty towns of hungry unemployed Americans would spring up across America.
President Palin (she killed McCain, claiming he tried to rape her) like president Hover would order the Army to Kill squatters and homeless.
Less people more opportunity.
That's what bought and paid for politicians said.
We took away one of the most essential regulations of all, which is bankruptcy.