DNA, the Grammar of Tender Gender

Fiction and fideism may be more popular than fact and faith, but the choosing of the first over the latter is with very different consequence. The evidence from today’s perspective is that culture driven by fiction and fideism is neither conscionable nor sustainable.

Every person is by nature sexual. Sexuality qualifies personal gender across a spectrum of human traits, which dispose the way in which each relates with other. The evolution of sexuality qualifies the nature of gender, and one’s gender qualifies the “nature of the nurture” one brings to interpersonal relationships.

Sexuality and gender are physical and psychological. Personal psychology qualifies how a person behaves inter-relationally. Psychology characterizes how a person is human, sexual, beyond what is “animal.” “Being human” is the outcome of soul (consciousness) qualified by the play of faith (femininity) and reason (masculinity) in mutual regard.

If DNA is “life’s sacred canon”, how is the language/ grammar of woman/ man, faith/ reason correspondence, affected?

http://www.secondenlightenment.org/DNA,%20Life's%20Sacred%20Canon.pdf

Woman/ man communication qualifies gender consciousness and sensitivity, the manner of interpersonal relationships in sexual intimacy and in the family nursery that qualifies personalities of children.

Each of us is uniquely sexual in the way nature disposes us genetically; and we are self-qualified by the way we bring faith and reason together in word and behavior, the distinction of humanness. Faith/ reason interactions are for the individual person the common ground that disposes sensitivity in interpersonal relationships toward under-standing what it means to be Godlike and how to behave sensitively, Godlike.

What is it about DNA, chromosomes that qualify personal character (nature) even as gender (nurture) qualifies the grammar of sexual expression? Gender sensitivity is trashed when sexual domination (male instinct) imposes. The tender sense of gender (more characteristic of females) works intuitionally to soften male harshness.

Deeper female intuition is genetically advanced by the female contribution of DNA. DNA comes to the conceptus, embryo, by way of female cell-nucleus contributions (ovum) and male (sperm), and by female contribution only to cytoplasmic DNA, in mitochondria and plastids. All subsequent cell division involves female biochemistry uniquely, that is, in activating RNA and ribosome in the formation of the child’s DNA in the womb and out.

http://www.secondenlightenment.org/The%20Evolution%20of%20Symbiosis.pdf

Motherly DNA writes the grammar of all cytoplasmic processing, thereby scripting the genetic grammar that characterizes the personality of the newborn. Inclinaion toward Godlikeness grows out of faith, female-rationalized—a reality of religion males need to know if they would curb their proclivities toward alienating, dominating and controlling essential woman, and frustrating essential earth/ human relationships.