I saw this man's posts. He did a bunch of articles. He got no comments. Not one. He left Gather. I feel so bad. It's seems to be getting harder to get comments on Gather, so the new people really get lost. Maybe Gather needs to give incentives for comments, so people won't be so selfish and make comments. Just a suggestion. I don't know what else to do. Any suggestions?
To the new people,
It takes time to grow a base here. I'd say about a month of your article writing, pictures etc., as well as your commenting. I don't think people realize that making comments, while you don't get points, gets you noticed.
The end!


Comments: 29
I think if you want to be noticed you just got to comment all over the place and then someone will notice your icon and want to check your stuff out.
It seems to me that Gather should provide a welcome package that explains, in detail, what groups are, how to join them, and the benefits. Same thing for friend requests; both sending and receiving them.
Aubrey suggested commenting all over the place, but if you're a newbie and don't know how to navigate, how do you find things on which to comment. Gather should also address that situation.
I did't kno or i would have posted on his stuff. i tend to post on new peoples stuff that don't have very many comments or posts.
So how is anyone to know what is new or popular? How do you meet anybody new if you can't see what is getting people talking?
I haven't made a new connection in about a year and I don't get comments because most of the people I knew are gone.
There is very little communication going on in here any more...sad
it's all relative anyway. some of my articles get over 400 views and 100 comments, some get less than 50 views and no comments.
it's more about THEM, than YOU-- let's face it, if you want an "audience" you have to cater to that audience, and it's about more than just making sure you recipirocate with comments on all of your "friends" articles.
I have almost 200 "friends" and it would be impossible for me to comment on the articles they all post-- particularly because there are a great many people that don't publish articles, they just comment on other people's stuff.
The simple truth is, we browse until we see something that catches our eye, our interest, and we check it out.
That's the way these social networking sites operate-- people that like publishing pictures of flowers, naturally seek out other flower lovers.
People that post stories about sports, generally find other sports fans to associate with, and they connect through shared interest.
sometimes when I'm "dissing" people, I realize later they are one of my gather "friends," and there's nothing I can do about it, I've already posted the words.
people do what they do because of the opinions they hold and the interests that excite them and cause them to spend time seeking out other people with the same interests.
some people just aren't equiped to enjoy "social networking."
Writers may still write regardless of having an audience but I find I am less inclined to do so if no one is reading or commenting. I write articles about issues that confront people in their daily lives, mainly centering around family issues that I have encountered. I know my audience is limited in its scope but when people read my stuff they get a true sense of who I am. This makes it personal. I am more inclined to seek out articles published by the people who have taken the time to leave me a comment.