Okay, technically the European Union isn't saying that sushi should be banned. But the EU has recommended listing bluefin tuna as an endangered species. And that could eventually mean that trade of the tuna most used in sushi does get banned. Which means we might all have to live with eating eel.
Most marine scientists agree that many fish species are severely over-fished. This had led to stocks so low that populations are no longer sustainable. Scientific advisors to the EU this week warned EU ministers of collapsing stocks of bluefin tuna in the Mediterranean Sea and the larger Atlantic Ocean. And with the EU behind banning trade of the delectable fish, it is highly likely that the same will happen next March at the next CITES meeting. For those who aren't familiar with it, CITES stands for the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, and is an international agreement between governments. According to its web site, its "aim is to ensure that international trade in specimens of wild animals and plants does not threaten their survival."
Not everyone agrees, of course. It should come as no surprise that Japan is actively lobbying to keep the current restrictions in place. These restrictions are much less onerous, something obviously more to the liking of a country that imports about 80% of the bluefin tuna retrieved in waters of the EU (not to mention elsewhere). Spain, Italy and Malta, all with large bluefin fisheries, are also not happy with the idea of any restrictions. On the flip side, several EU members, including France, the UK and the Netherlands, have publicly supported ending or suspending the fishing of bluefin tuna. In the end, the EU, however, votes as a block at CITES - fully 25% of the votes - so it is difficult for any one country to overturn a ban.
The EU’s position isn't final though, and may be revised pending additional information related to ongoing conservation efforts due later this year. And while the environmental unit of the Commission is strongly in favor of a complete ban, the Commission's fisheries unit is not keen on introducing additional regulation that could hurt the EU's fishing industry. Some argue that if the conservation efforts solve the over-fishing problem, a complete trade ban might not be necessary. In any case, the decision will be made in March 2010.
According to the European Commission's position paper, “[f]rom a scientific and technical point of view, the criteria for the listing of Atlantic bluefin tuna [as an endangered species] appear to be met...There is no doubt about the link between international trade and overexploitation of the species.”
Given my own marine fisheries experience, sometimes you have to just say no to overfishing.
|
by
David K.
Member since:
April 29, 2007 Should all sushi be banned to save the bluefin tuna? The EU thinks so!
September 15, 2009 02:14 PM EDT
views: 191
|
rating: 10/10
(11 votes)
|
comments: 81
To Groups:
Everything Accepted!, Points Generator, Political Futures, Progressive Politics, Current Hot topics., 2008 Archive - any article created in 2008, All About You And Me, Gathering For...., Artistic MindsĀ®, Article and Photos (post any thing group), Democracy 2.0, Best Of Gather, Get the point?, Gatherism, The Political Discussion Group, Anything and Everything, All for views, Independent Minds, Post It All!, One Article at a time, Political News Hound, Carol Lloyd, America, this is our moment. This is our time, ! 2009 Gather Archive !, Points Points Points, WE HEART GATHER!, Rake 'em in! Rack 'em up!, YaDaYadaYada, Sustainability for Real People, Points - Whatever You Want To Post, *P*O*S*T**I*T**A*L*L**2*0*0*8**, presidential points, Jump In The Spotlight!, Sci-tech for writers, Middle Ground, Expand Your Mind, Intelligent politics, Obama-Biden Watch 2008-2012, Friends on Gather, Northern Virginians Unite!, It's all good, Orange Juice, Take Care of Your Share, politics and international news, Explore Europe, Vote 2008!, This & That, Affairs of the State, Posting Frenzy, All Things Politics, This, That and the Other, 2008 Resolutions, Midwest Skeptic Society, Free Thinking, Gather it All and Share it with Your Friends, Media Bytes, The Commons, The News Cafe, Science on the Edge, Now where did I put those points?, Any article, picture or comment...Oh My!, Saving Our Environment, Earth Day, The Practical Green, Earth School, !Point it Out!, Gather Explorers, We the People, Political, Social, and Religious Views Forum, Gather Politics Essential, The Shameless Self-Promoters Group, Science for Everyone, Barack Obama's Presidential Appointments, Bills and Policies, change, Rejected? Never here, post it all!, Prove it!, ! You Read What? on Gather !, News & Commentary Videos, Desperate Gatherwives - Publish Anything, ! Post Office @ Gather Town !, Pilers Anonomous, Ariel's View of Politics, History and News, Political Boxing, Type and post What You want AND dont get Deleted!, Post anything..., !!na na hey hey we want points!!, What Friends Are For, Innovation Futures, International Travel (Here and Abroad), Politics Corps, Unified Individualists, !!!TODAY'S TOP PHOTOS AND ARTICLES!!! (submit your favorite articles and photos), Vivians Various Variable Voluminous oh just Post it all, Monkey Around To 3000, Things You Should Know About, Point me to the Points!, Barack Obama for President, Disagreeing without being disagreeable, science and mathematics, Think Globally Act Locally, A Pathway to Points... post it all, A new beginning to a new year, A place for all you point gatherers to connect!, The Nonconformist, ! Go Green, Debating Politics, Points Maximizer, @ to Z - Post everything from A-Z (minus the X stuff), The Conservative Club, **Let's Get Together~ Post anything!**, aworldgroup4all, fishytales, Intelligent Thought, You Gotta Love it!!, One Hundred Comments, 2009: All things created in '09, Tidbits From the Past, Isn't it about TYME?, IT'S ALL ABOUT THE POINTS - POINTS MAXIMIZER - JOIN MY GROUP, Change the World, Inviting-Points, Points Extravaganza, People With Something To Say, The Intellectual Activist, Democratic Vision, Politico, Stop Cape Wind!, Think About This, Arielle's Points Parlor, Gatherites for John McCain, ! Get To The Points, Popular Science Writing, Opinionated Opinions, !!! ViewMasters !!!, all about mother nature, Science & Beyond, News, Politics and the Economy, ! The Wildlife Reserve, THE WHATEVER GROUP, Politics Today
Please provide details below to help Gather review this content. If it is found to be inappropriate and in violation of the Gather Terms of Service, action will be taken.
You have successfully submitted a report for this post.
|
|
More by David K. |
|||||||
About Gather |
Engagement Marketing |
Make New Friends |
Gather Points |
Advertise on Gather |
Gather Press |
Privacy |
Terms of Service |
Community Guidelines
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Version 16836, "Oz"; Copyright © 2009 Gather Inc. All rights reserved.


Comments: 81
Oh, and the limits would be on commercial fishing, not sport fishing.
Nothing to do with this article but the U.S. has just imposed a $10.00 salt water licence above the regular sport fishing licence on all non commercial fishing in any open ocean water nationwide.
I know where I live in New England The 4 states that border the Atlantic have commercial fishing limits strictly enforced by the states as well as the Coast Guard and its not worth it to the commercial boats to pay the huge fines that come with disregarding the set limits.
The trouble with ocean fish, especially the free ranging pelagic ones, is that some species can travel for vast distances. So not only are they in international waters but they are also in the territorially claimed waters of this country or that country or the other country. So the jurisdiction changes. These international agreements are the only way to manage the stocks of oceanic fish, and as you say, it doesn't help that some countries don't play be the rules (usually because of the economic importance of that particular fishery to them).
I still think it would be better for one generation of humans to seriously cut down on their Bluefin Tuna intake than it would be for ALL FUTURE generations of humans to do without Bluefin sushi. If we all look at it that way it becomes a no-brainer. In several cases, over-exploited ocean or estuarine fisheries (for example, Striped Bass in the chesapeake region) have made impressive recoveries.
There have already been attempts to cut back on the overfishing, though not all countries have been good about sticking to it (for obvious reasons). What this would do is list it as endangered on the CITES list, which would give the international community more leverage to restrict fishing more. Needless to say, if we all ate less bluefin tuna there would be less pressure on the stocks. But given that bluefin is the most favored tuna for sushi, and the amount of sushi that Japan and the world (and me) eat annually, I can see where it would be hard to really made a significant change.
And you make a great point. But wasn't there a complete moratorium on rockfish in the Chesapeake for a while? Sometimes you have to stop the take completely to give them a chance to recover, that is if we haven't already knocked their populations down below recoverable levels.
The other thing is modifying methods of catching. Long lining, netting, and harpooning are all methods that could be changed somewhat. Unfortunately, like here in the US/Canada, jobs will be lost so it will be a hard sell.
One of the concerns in these things is always the impact on fishermen and the restaurants and other workers that rely on the catch. But then if there are no fish left to catch no one has a job anyway.
This seems different though as none of those nations have the muscle to enforce the idea. Guess we'll see what happens.
It's been a while since I've been on the Narragansett.
later on of course, you will all die together. But on Easter Island, there was apparently some cannibalism, so you had at least a shot at eating your enemy before starving.
The Easter Island story sounds like a case of the "Tragedy of the Commons" the seminal article in Science by Garrett Hardin.
Thanks for sharing the article ...its a very pretty fish!! So I am saving a fish !!!
Just the thought of eatins shusi turns my stomache...
I could eat soy protein sushi...and I would probably live longer, wouldn't I?
We're killing ourselves, along with this spaceship we call Earth.
But yes, we need to be more aware of what kind of impact 7 billion people (and growing) has on the planet.
Also sushi does not mean raw, sashimi is raw. There is many different types of sushi, and there is many different cuts and parts. The stuff that most of America knows is in a can or a pouch, and that is usually a cheaper more plentiful type.
end result will be that more poor people who rely on tuna fishing to feed their families will be forced into deeper poverty by instituting a ban
I agree that it's a good idea to promote other types of tuna, though there are population issues with several species (seems we like our tuna). I like monkfish, swordfish and shark, but each of those has been overfished also.
The impact on fishermen is difficult, since not restricting fishing will definitely kill off the stocks faster, which means no one gets any fish anymore. And that certainly isn't good for making a livelihood. It's a tough problem, no two ways about it.
We definitely need to be more aware of our impact on the planet. It's not like there are only just a few of us...and the areas with the highest growth are actually the areas with the least ability to do it sustainably. It's up to us to lead the way.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-QA2rkpBSY&feature=channel
It is a very good explanation of the exponential function. This guy is wonderful at explaining the basics of the problems we have run ourselves into.
I am please at least that your thread has generated reasoned discussion. Nobody has popped off with "eat all the tuna you want, God will make more" or some such nonsense.
As for the poppers, they are definitely active in other threads. Unfortunately. I'm trying my best to ignore those who choose obfuscation above fact.
And do you know if this is also the norm in other big beef producing countries, e.g., Argentina and Japan?