Chemicals are on everyone's mind these days, it seems. In the US there is talk of "reforming TSCA," the chemical control law that has been in force for over 30 years. In Canada they are prioritizing chemicals for further review. And in Europe, the chemicals agency created to manage the REACH process is struggling to keep its roughly $30 million a year budget.
The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA), which is based in Helsinki, Finland, is tasked with managing the Registration, Evaluation, and Authorisation of Chemicals (REACH) program. The problem is that its funding is dependent on registration fees that haven't started coming in yet. So to help fund it the European Union member states agreed to provide up front money, but due to the worldwide recession states are trying to cut back everywhere they can. And that might include ECHA.
Last year companies who manufacture or important chemicals in quantities of one tonne or more were required to "pre-register" their intent to keep the chemicals on the market. Pre-registration, which ended December 1, 2008, was free to companies, which meant no funds to ECHA. Registration fees vary by tonnage produced but can range up to around $70,000 per chemical and per legal entity. Given that many companies have several legal entities in Europe (e.g., different affiliates manufacturing the chemical in France, Germany and Italy, each one considered a legal entity), the fees going to ECHA can be large per chemical. While ECHA expected about 300,000 pre-registrations, the actual number was on the order of 2.7 million. So ECHA should be well-funded to handle the registrations once they come in.
But what about the period until then. The first registration deadline (for high quantity or more hazardous chemicals) isn't until November 30, 2010, and most of the pre-registered chemicals are slated for later deadlines. So until then ECHA is running on borrowed money, which according to ECHA's Executive Director, Geert Dancet, is barely sufficient to hire and train the needed staff (and get them to move to Finland).
All is not lost, as the European parliament’s environment committee voted recently to maintain ECHA’s annual budget, but this must still be approved by two other committees and the full Parliament. Dancet is relatively confident that he will get full funding for another year, just long enough for the large numbers of registration fees expected to arrive in mid 2010 as companies finish compiling the vast amounts of data needed to support the safety of their chemicals.
|
by
David K.
Member since:
April 29, 2007 Is the agency charged with ensuring chemical safety running out of money?
September 08, 2009 02:41 PM EDT
views: 371
|
comments: 22
To Groups:
Everything Accepted!, Points Generator, Political Futures, Progressive Politics, Current Hot topics., 2008 Archive - any article created in 2008, All About You And Me, Gathering For...., Hawk's Aerie, Article and Photos (post any thing group), Democracy 2.0, Best Of Gather, Get the point?, Gatherism, Vision 20/20, The Political Discussion Group, Anything and Everything, All for views, Independent Minds, Post It All!, One Article at a time, Political News Hound, Carol Lloyd, ! 2009 Gather Archive !, America, this is our moment. This is our time, Points Points Points, WE HEART GATHER!, Rake 'em in! Rack 'em up!, YaDaYadaYada, Points - Whatever You Want To Post, *P*O*S*T**I*T**A*L*L**2*0*0*8**, presidential points, Sci-tech for writers, Middle Ground, Expand Your Mind, Intelligent politics, Obama-Biden Watch 2008-2012, Friends on Gather, Northern Virginians Unite!, It's all good, Orange Juice, Take Care of Your Share, politics and international news, Vote 2008!, This & That, Affairs of the State, Posting Frenzy, All Things Politics, This, That and the Other, 2008 Resolutions, Midwest Skeptic Society, Free Thinking, Gather it All and Share it with Your Friends, Media Bytes, The News Cafe, Science on the Edge, Now where did I put those points?, Any article, picture or comment...Oh My!, Saving Our Environment, Earth Day, !Point it Out!, Gather Explorers, We the People, Political, Social, and Religious Views Forum, Gather Politics Essential, The Shameless Self-Promoters Group, Science for Everyone, Barack Obama's Presidential Appointments, Bills and Policies, change, Rejected? Never here, post it all!, Prove it!, ! You Read What? on Gather !, News & Commentary Videos, Desperate Gatherwives - Publish Anything, ! Post Office @ Gather Town !, Pilers Anonomous, Ariel's View of Politics, History and News, Political Boxing, Type and post What You want AND dont get Deleted!, Post anything..., !!na na hey hey we want points!!, What Friends Are For, Innovation Futures, Politics Corps, !!!TODAY'S TOP PHOTOS AND ARTICLES!!! (submit your favorite articles and photos), Vivians Various Variable Voluminous oh just Post it all, Monkey Around To 3000, Things You Should Know About, Barack Obama for President, Point me to the Points!, Disagreeing without being disagreeable, Anything BUT Games - NO GAMES, science and mathematics, Think Globally Act Locally, A Pathway to Points... post it all, A new beginning to a new year, A place for all you point gatherers to connect!, The Nonconformist, Debating Politics, Points Maximizer, @ to Z - Post everything from A-Z (minus the X stuff), The Conservative Club, **Let's Get Together~ Post anything!**, aworldgroup4all, Intelligent Thought, You Gotta Love it!!, One Hundred Comments, Nonprofit Nation, 2009: All things created in '09, Tidbits From the Past, Isn't it about TYME?, IT'S ALL ABOUT THE POINTS - POINTS MAXIMIZER - JOIN MY GROUP, Change the World, Inviting-Points, People With Something To Say, Points Extravaganza, The Intellectual Activist, Democratic Vision, Think About This, Arielle's Points Parlor, Gatherites for John McCain, ! Get To The Points, Popular Science Writing, Opinionated Opinions, !!! ViewMasters !!!, Science & Beyond, News, Politics and the Economy, !!! Comment Speedway !!!, THE WHATEVER GROUP, Politics Today
Please provide details below to help Gather review this content. If it is found to be inappropriate and in violation of the Gather Terms of Service, action will be taken.
You have successfully submitted a report for this post.
|
|
More by David K. |
|||||||
About Gather |
Engagement Marketing |
Make New Friends |
Gather Points |
Advertise on Gather |
Gather Press |
Privacy |
Terms of Service |
Community Guidelines
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Version 16961, "Pacino"; Copyright © 2009 Gather Inc. All rights reserved.


Comments: 22
So we need to be more rational, and to do that we need to have the right information (and pay attention to it).
Chemical cleanup is going to affect how companies operate but some agency as the ECHA has to be a watch dog over corporations that cannot be relied on to take the necessary precautions to handle chemicals in a safe way. The ECHA should be fully funded and staffed without having to beg for funds.
PLus, having to register each chemical from each company is an unannounced burden of paperwork for those companies; without compensation..
PLus, having to register each chemical from each company is an unannounced burden of paperwork for those companies; without compensation..
I'm not following your logic.
1) It was announced. In fact, it was being discussed openly for nearly a decade before it was finally passed, and the "entry into force" (when the law starts) was 1 year after enactment and then companies had 3 years to develop the paperwork for the highest volument chemicals (and until 2018 for lower volumes).
2) The paperwork is actually a summary of all of the health and safety information on a particular chemical manufactured or imported by the company. So do you think that companies should not have to demonstrate the safety of chemicals they make, some of which have very widespread use in all sorts of products? Or do you think they just shouldn't have to submit the data to the agency for review? It would seem both options would put companies who practice the best product stewardship at a competitive disadvantage since any of their competitors (including from foreign countries) could simply sell a product without having to prove it was safe, or even that it contained the chemicals they say it does (or do contain some they say it doesn't).
3) I'm not sure I understand the "without compensation" part. The article talks about the fees companies need to pay to get registered. But I suppose the "compensation" is the fact that companies would be able to continue to sell their chemicals, or sell new ones, which is a multi-hundred-billion dollar industry just in Europe. So certainly spending up to $75,000 per registration when you stand to have millions or billions of dollars in sales seems a small price to pay.
I see your point. If I understand right; IF a "bug spray" has 31 chemicals in it, then that spray would be registrable with those 31.
I guess one could say it is a "truth in chemical labeling law."
I can not remember that chemical's name. But it seems to be a common chemical made as a "side product" of many processes.