The death penalty. How do you feel about it?
Did you know that since 1973, 130 people have been released from death rows around the country due to new evidence which proved they were innocent? Some had spent years on death row for crimes they did not commit. Had they been executed during that time, there would have been no bringing them back to life. If this many were released..
How many innocent people may have died?
What are the reasons for the death penalty?
Is it a deterrent?
In September, 2000, The New York Times conducted a survey which found that in the last twenty years, states with the death penalty have had homicide rates 48 to 101 percent higher than states without the death penalty. Other studies have corroborated these results. This makes sense, since most crimes are crimes of passion, done in the heat of the moment or under the influence of drugs or alcohol or during a panic while committing a lesser crime such as a robbery. The only time the death penalty could be a deterrent would be when the murder is pre-meditated, and most of the death row defendents are not there for pre-meditated crimes.
In September, 2000, The New York Times conducted a survey which found that in the last twnety years, states with the death penalty have had homicide rates 48 to 101 percent higher than states without the death penalty.
Does it save taxpayer money?
To execute a prisoner costs about $3 millions dollars
To keep a prisoner in jail for a lifetime without chance of parole costs about $650,000.Recent studies have indicated that the death penalty costs 70% more than life time incarceration, in Tennessee 48% more, and in Maryland, the death penaly costs 3 times as much. In 2008, a California Commisson found that a system without the death penalty would cost 11.5 millions dollars, compared to 137 million with the death penalty. Even with no appeals, the death penalty is still more expensive.
Is it fair?
According to the US General Accounting Office, persons accused of murdering white victims are three times more likely to get the death penalty than those accused of murdering any other race. 95% of the death row inmates were unable to afford their own attorneys. African-American defendents receive the death penalty three times more often than other defendents when the victim is white. There is clear discrimination due to social status and race.
State legislators, such as those here in Georgia, often try to cut the budget for "indigent defense funds" by saying they don't want to spend taxes to "defend criminals." What happened, then, to innocent until proven guilty? It is much easier to prove innocence with the right lawyers, obviously.
Only 2% of those convicted of a crime which could receive the death penalty are actually given that penalty. It is up to the prosecutor to determine whether the sentence is sought or not, and this may vary according to local politics, plea bargains, or sheer chance.
Since 1976, when the death penalty was reinstated by the Supreme Court, 80% of all executions have taken place in the South.
A current case, that of Troy Anthony Davis, is perfect example of a death row inmate who is not guilty "beyond reasonable doubt." Nearly every one of the witnesses in his case have recanted, most claiming that they were coerced into testifying by the police. There was no physical evidence connecting Troy to the crime, and in fact one expert witness claimed that the crime was committed by a left-handed person. Troy Davis is right-handed. The NAACP, former President Jimmy Carter, Amnesty Internation, Representative Bob Barr, and thousands of other people have spoken up for Troy, asking only that he be given a new trial to hear the new evidence. So far, the appeal has been denied.
If Troy Davis was not a black man in Georgia who was convicted of killing a white policeman, would he be where he is? Looking at the statistics above, what do you think?
It is time for the United States, and the South, to give us this archaic, expensive, ineffective, and ultimately immoral form of punishment. Think about it.
|
by
Rhetta A.
Member since:
July 28, 2006 Assessing the Death Penalty
July 19, 2009 01:52 PM EDT
views: 92
|
rating: 10/10
(5 votes)
|
comments: 39
Please provide details below to help Gather review this content. If it is found to be inappropriate and in violation of the Gather Terms of Service, action will be taken.
You have successfully submitted a report for this post.
|
|
More by Rhetta A. |
||||
About Gather |
Engagement Marketing |
Make New Friends |
Gather Points |
Advertise on Gather |
Gather Press |
Privacy |
Terms of Service |
Community Guidelines
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Version 16865, "Oz"; Copyright © 2009 Gather Inc. All rights reserved.


Comments: 39
exactly !
And DNA testing isn't done enough, anyway. Innocent people are killed just so we can have some revenge.
3Million to execute? Is this because of the legal costs involved or what? That's a lot of dough.
Your examples of prisoners released after evidence being found proving them not guilty is another good reason to not allow the government to kill it's citizens.
The death penalty may be a deterrent but not much of one.
People who sit on the juries in this country are being told that it is their duty to meter out justice as based upon the law, which is a crock, the duty of the jury is to protect the innocent from bad law and bad government period!
Every person who sits on a jury should look at the prosecutors case automatically with extreme skepticism and find a person guilty of the accused crime only if it is proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
And all of the objections and stricken from the records should be done so only if the juror deems it proper and not pertinent, not just because the judge directs you to do so.
Two-thirds of the countries in the world have now abolished the death penalty in law or practice.
Amnesty International's latest information shows that:
88 countries and territories have abolished the death penalty for all crimes
11 countries have abolished the death penalty for all but exceptional crimes such as wartime crimes
29 countries can be considered abolitionist in practice: they retain the death penalty in law but have not carried out any executions for the past 10 years or more making a total of 128 countries which have abolished the death penalty in law or practice.
69 other countries retain and use the death penalty, but the number of countries which actually execute prisoners in any one year is much smaller.
During 2007, 24 countries, 88% in China, Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and the United States alone, executed 1,252 people compared to 1,591 in 2006.
How do you like being in that list?
I think that with all of the modern forenics that we have today, we should know without a doubt if someone is guilty or not... I believe in the death penality...
I still do not see by the stats how it can be cheaper to house someone in prison than to execute...It may very well be, but could it be that whoever did the research on this didnt believe in the death penality.. I believe it is a mixture of 3 solutions that are required to give a lethel injection .. if it is this expensive than someone is ripping off our government... Which is very possible....but should be looked into..
I think that if crime is up and not deterred by this, its because more and more people use drugs and alcohol.. they go on binges and dont think clearly, in order to feed the habit they have to have money... so they commit crimes....
Society, is so greedy now, we have to have bigger and better houses, cars, boats, etc... We need money and we are way over our head... More crime is commited... I dont think people value human lives, they are not afraid of jails...and the death penality is not given out that often....they arent afraid to die either...
THis is a good article and you have raised some good points....
Thanks for this rational and reality-based piece.
Unfortunately, our entire process has, over the many years since the country was founded, become so far removed from the righteous feelings of unjust persecution such as the Framers felt from agents of the Crown, that we have lost all touch with how bad a system that favors some over others can become. We live in a country with a completely disproportionate number of poor and minority persons in prison and on death row... The fact that, due to the wonderful, generous efforts of a few college law students, so many of these poor unfortunates have been found to be COMPLETELY INNOCENT of the crimes for which they were convicted, ought to be to our complete SHAME as a nation and is, in many quarters given only a lackadaisical and begrudging shrug of acknowledgment, is unforgivable.
I would not "pull the switch" on you but I would wonder about your mental health and I would consider cuffing your silly ass in to a classroom.
There are certain individuals that we don't need to keep in jail....like John Wayne Gacy. Gee, 32 bodies were discoved in the basement of his house....
And I look at it by a different prospective....as one who has been stalked by a rapist and killer.
Grow Up!