From August 14, 1975 until February 7, 1998, I resided in Israel. When I arrived in the country, health care was organized in the form of four health funds that most Americans might have termed "socialized" medicine. However, behind that label were some realities that were surprising. In the health fund that I joined, I could choose my own doctor. I could go to most specialists without a referral. In the event that I went to a hospital, I had to obtain a form, Form 17 it was called, to ensure that the health fund would pay for the care in the hospital, but that was a simple procedure. Years later, I learned that two of the other funds had similar structures, and eventually, even the fourth one developed into the same structure. Payments for the membership in each fund were based upon a person's salary; a member would have to submit a payment stub to have membership dues calculated.
In 1995, Israel adopted Universal Health Care, a national law that made health care available to all residents of the country. At that point, membership in a health fund became mandatory and dues were collected in the form of a health tax. Salaried individuals paid for it out of their salaries. Self-employed individuals paid for it together with their tax payments. Persons receiving government benefits had the tax deducted from their benefits, and unemployed persons had the tax deducted from their unemployment payments.
That explains the payment part of the health care system, but the real question relates to the quality of the system. From my own viewpoint, I would say that the quality of the system was excellent, and I never feared insolvency as a result of having to partake of health care of any sort; I could focus in on getting well exclusively.
I had surgeries without any significant problems. I was in hospitals ahd received prompt, efficient care. I also tell the true story of my father-in-law who had a stroke and spent a week in the hospital and then afterward spent 2 1/2 months in a live-in rehab center; for the entire period, he paid only $80, and he came out functioning very well.
To see a doctor, I would go to the clinic, where a receptionist would pass my magnetic membership card through a reader to determine if I had paid my quarterly copay -- one payment for unlimited quarterly visits. The amount was very small. When I went into the doctor in the next room, he had all my records online and was ready to treat me. It was the same with a specialist. If a doctor wanted the vital signs, he took them himself; there was no staff employed to do that. Nor were there stacks of folders; all the information was kept online.
Insofar as prescription medications went, I would receive scripts from my doctor that were written on forms from the health fund. I would present them to a pharmacy, where I received the medications at a subsidized price.
When I returned to the United States in 1998, the first thing my father and stepmother hit me with was the hysterical warning, "Get yourself some health insurance - now." I was able to do that soon enough, thanks to some very supportive people that I met. As time has gone by, I could not help but remember how I had lived in a system that worked. It wasn't free; there were taxes, much like the premiums we pay here. Yet everyone had coverage, something we can't say here. All it takes for me to feel nostalgia is to receive a medical bill that insurance hasn't covered, for whatever reason there may be. Having worked in a managed health care company for a short period, I know how the industry works, and it's all pure business; that only makes me yearn more for a system that places health at a higher priority than a profit margin.




Comments: 21
That's really encouraging.
Thanks!
Excellent, informative article. I am all for a National health Care System!!
Please post this to ! Healthcare for EVERYBODY !
I did. Now it's running twice.
About time we had an extensive and reasoned description and explication of an actual National Health system. WAY too much hysteria around this subject.
That's all we're asking for, Maurice. A system like you described that assures a person the ability to pay for his/her own health care and not have to go without treatment or worry about accruing serious debt when seeking medical assistance.
Yeah, a system that works. Canada and Britain and Sweden's systems work much better than ours, too, but to get a system like that, US residents would have to be charged more in taxes than they're willing to pay, sooooo.....
From day one, when the Mayflower arrived, the American personality was formed: NO ONE IS GOING TO TELL US HOW TO WORSHIP. From Day two, when we threw over the tea, NO ONE IS GOING TO TAX US WITHOUT REPRESENTATION AND WE ARE NOT YOUR COLONY, to Day Three, July 4, 1776, WE ARE NOT GOING TO LET ANY GOVERNMENT TELL US WHAT TO DO....
Yeah, everything in this country is pure business; the religion and politcal party of the US is capitalism. The delivery of health care here is poor, because delivery, as you point out, is NOT the point, but that profit is, and the profit of the health care system is very profitable for those who are profiting by it, doctors, insurers and hospitals.
That is a very interesting way of running a health system in a country.
Thats too easy a system for the US. The Insurance companies would have to get involved and there would be just as many "funds" as people and most would still be too expensive and wouldn't pay crap, just like we have now.
Thanks for throwing some light on the matter. I have a girlfriend that lived in Israel where she received her nurses training. When she came to the US to live and work she is blow away about how horrible the management and organization is in the hospitals for the nurse.
For example, the nurses are graded according to their customer feedback. Meaning that if some nurse gets a terminal patient, or someone in a lot of pain, or someone prejudiced against them for whatever reason they get graded down, and it has nothing to do with their performance at all. In America we screw the workers, so this kind of random review process is just the think to be able to downgrade anyone's performance and keep a lid on their wages - at the expense of a competent and dedicated staff.
Our medical system is - in my opinion - inhuman, as are most of our major industries now. Go see the movie "Food Inc" for an idea how this affects our food industry.
The US is in deep sick trouble way down in its soul ... if we still have one.
Thank you for showing a system that works. So many people are so afraid of new programs that could help everyone. I think that we would be well served by a program such as this. Now if only we can reach that goal. We shall see. Peace
It's encouraging to hear about a working health care system. Some of them don't work this well.
Thanks Maurice!
Thanks Maurice. My friend in England receives excellent care, though there it can be a little slow.
thanks
I oh so hope to have that kind of system here in the US. I can't afford insurance right now and have medical assistance that I will be losing as soon as they receive my notification of my recent marriage. What you described sounds perfect in my book.
Thank you for a well description of what I been saying for years. I can Not get insurance because of my past medical problems (cancer)...I am considered too high risk. I can Not get state help because I work. I go without meds and doc. appointments because I can barely pay rent and bills at times...plus I am the soul supporter in my family. My husband is tempted to move out of the country just so he could gt his much needed back surgery...which no doctor will touch him because he has no insurance, so instead he is living with four crushed vertabrates and in constant pain.
If you listen to the right - pre-existing conditions are our fault.
I am neither Democrat or Republican - but an Independent who gave Obama a chance to enact the change he promised. I fully support Bernie Sander's single payer health plan.
The Democrats have a super majority in the house 60 votes in the Senate and no more excuses. If they screw this up - they deserve to lose the next election
I think we should call ALL member of congress with a simple message:
No single payer
No public option
No re-election
I would also like to add - I have heard the right put down the single payer as "socialized" medicine. I have asked on several occasions what was their plan - so far I haven't heard anything except being called a commie (as if I gave a sh*t what they call me).
I have said it before and I'll say it again - your Democratic leaders have got to grow a set tell the Republicans to STFU (Shut The F*ck UP) and get the health care plan done - let the Grossly Obstructionist Party fillibuster - it'll be their funeral.
The United States National Health Care Act, H.R. 676
Introduced by Rep. John Conyers.
Read the full bill.
Read an annotated version of the bill.
Brief Summary of the Legislation
The United States National Health Care Act establishes a unique American national universal health insurance program. The bill would create a publicly financed, privately delivered healthcare system that uses the already existing Medicare program by expanding and improving it to all U.S. residents, and all residents living in U.S. territories. The goal of the legislation is to ensure that all Americans will have access, guaranteed by law, to the highest quality and most cost effective healthcare services regardless of their employment, income, or healthcare status. With over 45-75 million uninsured Americans, and another 50 million who are under- insured, the time has come to change our inefficient and costly fragmented non-healthcare system.