You all have probably heard of the Trail of Tears, when the Cherokee Indians were sent from North Carolina and Georgia to Oklahoma by force in the 1800's.
You may also know, especially if you are from the South, of the great
devastation and death caused by the Civil War, and how people's homes
were burned or they were forced out of them so that they could be occupied
by the Union army.
But very few people know the story of another forced exile and a different
kind of devastation caused by the Civil War in Roswell, Georgia and the former
town of New Manchester.
In 1864, at least 400 and possibly as many as 700 mill workers, nearly all women,
black and white and their children, were arrested as traitors and shipped North by force, and very few of them ever made their way back home. Those husbands and sons who made it through the war returned home to Roswell to find their families gone, and no way of knowing where.
It was July, and the Atlanta Campaign was in full swing, General Sherman burning
and slashing his way to Atlanta and his March to the Sea. Seeking a way to
cross the Chattahoochee, General Kenner Garrard began his twelve-day occupation of
Roswell, which was completely undefended. Everyone except the mill-workers had fled
the city. The mills, two cotton mills and a woolen mill, remained in operation, making
cloth for uniforms and other military needs, like rope and canvas.
The day after Garrard arrived, he sent a message to Sherman that he had discovered the mills and was in the process of destroying them. Sherman messaged back that the destruction of the mills met his "entire approval." He then added,
"I repeat my orders that you arrest all people, male and female, connected with those factories, no matter what the clamor, and let them foot it, under guard, to Marietta, whence I will send them by [railroad] cars, to the North. . . . Let them [the women] take along their children and clothing, providing they have a means of hauling or you can spare them."
Then, a day later, he added, ""Whenever the people are in the way, ship them to a new country north and west."
The women and a few men who were too old or too young too fight and all the children were rounded up and marched, under guard, the ten or so miles to Marietta and brought to the abandoned Georgia Military Institute. Along the way, Garrard added more people who seemed to be "in the way."
General George H. Thomas wrote to Gen. Sherman, "The Roswell factory hands, 400 or 500 hundred in number, have arrived in Marietta. The most of them are women. I can only order them transportation to Nashville where it seems hard to turn them adrift. What had best be done with them?"
Sherman replied, "I have ordered General Webster at Nashville to dispose of them. They will be sent to Indiana."
There was another factory in the town of New Manchester on Sweet Water Creek due west of Atlanta where the women were also transported. But that city was burned to the ground and never rebuilt, so the women never returned and their fates have been lost.
From Marietta, they were loaded into boxcars, given several days' rations, and taken,not knowing where they were going or what their fate was to be, to Louisville, Kentucky, where many were unloaded, while some others were taken across the Ohio River into Indiana.
One woman who worked in the Mill was transported along with her mother and her grandmother, who were also mill workers. On the journey, her mother and her grandmother both died. The grandmother had been so feeble that
she had been transported aboard the steamship to be shipped across the Ohio in a rocking chair.
In the beginning, the women in Kentucky were fed and housed by a Louisville refugee hospital, but then they were left to find living quarters and employment on their own. The ones in Indiana struggled from the beginning, taking whatever work they could find. They were uneducated and knew nothing but mill work, and most eventually found employment in the Kentucky and Indiana mills. There was very little possibility that they would get home, and most were illiterate and could not write to anyone to let them know where they were.
These women were "the enemy," and, especially in Indiana, the towns along the river were overrun. Many of
the women died from disease, which reached epidemic proportions, and others of starvation or exposure.
Eventually, not knowing if their husbands were alive or dead, many of the women who survived remarried in the North. In the South, men came home from the war to find their wives and families missing, and presumed them dead, and remarried.
In at least one case, that of Adeline Bagley Buice, she did make it back to Georgia. She had been pregnant when she was shipped away, and it took her five years to get back to Roswell with her daughter, only to discover that her husband had given her up for dead and remarried.
It was not until 1998 that the Roswell Mills Camp No. 1547, Sons of the Confederate Veterans, began a project to try to identify the victims and locate their descendents. Intensive advertising and research led to many of the descendents being located, mostly in the North, and most of the mill workers were identified. In 2000, the city of Roswell erected a monument to the women who were exiled from there.
How does one justify making war on women and children? How does one ever justify it?
"War is Hell," Sherman said.
"The women of the south kept the war alive--and it is only by making them suffer that we can subdue the men," said Jeremiah Jenkins, a Union Lt. Colonel.
The sad thing is that the howl of the women, loud as it must have been, resounded for so short of time through the years. How can a lesson be learned, if the stories are not told?


Comments: 24
Wow - war stories are just so awful !!!
wow, a disturbing piece of this country's history.
I'm still trying to figure out how anyone justifies war, period.
That's the whole point. One cannot justify it at all. It doesn't matter which army or which commander. Such actions are vile and immoral.
Now, how do we justify ourselves to the innocents who are killed and injured by our troops abroad? Which of our interests justify the deaths of children?
I know about the Trail of Tears because my folks' farm in Indiana was a campsite along the way. There's a monument on the property to mark it. But the displaced (and misplaced!) mill workers is a chapter in our history I've never heard before. How could such an outrageoous thing be so little known? Thank you for telling their story.
wow. I just printed this off to share with a few co-workers. I had never heard of this. thank you for the article
That's awesome, Chas! I love knowing more people will see the article.
Sherman was a war criminal. He was an effective General, but his image was tarnished, I might say ruined, by this sort of unnecessarily horrific stuff.
Sherman saved the lives of thousands of southerners and their families. He damaged property and saved lives. The South would much rather he fought the way Grant did which killed many thousands and didn't harm the property so much. Sherman was about the best thing that could have happened to the South. He ended a lost war much sooner than expected.
Larry, we can all argue about war in retrospect, but the evidence does not support what you are saying. Sherman caused tremendous death and suffering. People starved, and died of disease and exposure. They were made homeless. They lost their homes, businesses, families. And they were killed by the thousands under Sherman's command. His way may not have been worse than Grant's or anyone else's, but it certainly wasn't better or more humane.
some of our american history isn't too pretty. My great-great grandparents were part of the trail of tears and moved from Georgia to Oklahoma.
How very "Gone With the Wind" of you, Rhetta. (Minus the stomach-churning racism, of course.) Interesting forgotten historical tidbit.
We could probably argue endlessly about whether "Gone With the Wind" is racist, Erin. But, avoiding that issue, there's not much connection between this true event and that story, other than the fact that they both happened in Georgia in the Civil War, is there?
No, there's not.
Interesting history that. I'm glad I chose to come and take a look.
It's true if I've ever heard of it previously, I've forgotten. Sad, if we personalize it and imagine ourselves in place of any one of those women or children or their husbands and fathers. :(
Terribly sad.
But, as notorious and sometimes harsh (or vile if that fits one's own perception) as Sherman's actions were they are past, he was not a war criminal, and war IS hell; as it should be. Think about it; we all at least intellectually know 'war is hell' and yet we (humans) will engage in war. Imagine if war was a walk in the park how many more wars we would have.
And the north had to win else half our pop would still be slaves (although that wasn't the only issue, it was a big one, the beginning-of-the-end-of-which, for the most part was settled in that war).
I agree with your point, in general, Lee, but I don't think that there would still be slavery today, even without the war. The industrial age would have made it unnecessary and impractical. A lot of people in the South abhorred the practice, even the ones who owned slaves. They tried to justify it to themselves, because the entire plantation system required it. Keeping slaves, from a purely financial point of view, was expensive, but hiring workers was even more expensive. So a lot of people would have been very happy to free their slaves once the process was more mechanized. The majority of historians believe that slavery would have entered within a matter of a few years even without the war.
This does in NO way justify slavery, which was evil. It merely means that the war was probably not necessary for that particular reason.
Hi Rhetta,
Hi Rhetta ... But we did have the war. Which is partially my point. I still think it was probably necessary according to the times, the timing, politically, as well as to get things started irt getting rid of slavery. Why leave it entrenched any longer than necessary even if it would end of it's own accord in a matter of a few years? ...
But since it didn't happen how can I or anyone know if maybe waiting might have been better. And we did go to war which, as I started to say above, is one of my points. Humans will go to war. Thank heaven it is hell or we would certainly have more of it.
Which means, I guess, there is another level of importance in bringing these stories out. Not necessarily to place blame or to stop war, the blame is on humanity no doubt and because we live in a fallen world (some don't ascribe to that but one only has to look around to see evidence it's true). No ... and not even to try to end war; that's not gonna happen because we, humans, are involved. We will war.
Seems to me what these kinds of historic accounts do, is (not just this of course) helps blunt er ... temper the natural human tendency toward conflict leading to war. Helps us avoid it better and longer than we might otherwise.
Not disagreeing ... or being oppositional ...
No, I didn't think it was oppositional. I just thought your comment was interesting to discuss. And I agree with you about this. I think maybe we might can help moderate we conduct war, at least. I still hold out hope that, while there will always be war somewhere, America could yet choose to try other means of solving conflict.
Fascinating, Rhetta!
Thank you for a great post!
Thank you, Curt! I thought it was interesting.