The underdog of Britain's Got Talent, whom viewers across the world came to love, didn't win as many expected. Instead, Susan Boyle's finale performance came in second to the much younger and cooler act, Diversity.
Did Britain get it right? Do you think the dance troupe Diversity was more talented than Susan Boyle? Is it possible that all this time Susan Boyle was just overrated and only got so far ahead based on her looks? Vote on who you think deserved to win below.
See Susan Boyle's final performance here.
This is the performance that made Diversity a winner:
In my opinion, Diversity's routine took more time and effort. They created new choreography for the finale, while Susan Boyle sang a tune she had already performed. But who is more likely to have a more successful career? A dance troupe can only go so far, but a singer's career can be so much more. In my opinion, the two different acts shouldn't even be compared or judged next to one another. Also, while Susan Boyle didn't win, she can brag that she inspired more people than Diversity did. Thoughts?