Ben Chang, spokesman for president Obama's National Security Adviser, said on February 5, 2009 that Obama's Administration supports "the International Criminal Court in its pursuit of those who've perpetrated war crimes [in Darfur]. We see no reason to support deferral [of the indictment] at this time."
However, when the alleged war criminals are Americans, such as the former president George Bush and the rest of his Administration, as well as the CIA and U.S. army personnel, then Barack Obama wants to prevent any prosecution of the perpetrators.
It's hypocritical that so many Americans, including president Obama, want justice in Darfur, while at the same time pardoning and/or justifying the crimes and torture committed by their own government and military.
Vincent Warren, Executive Director of the American Center for Constitutional Rights, says that "the Obama Administration's stand against impunity for president al-Bashir for serious international crimes and support of his arrest warrant should go hand in hand with the investigation and prosecution in U.S. courts of those American former high level officials, starting with Donald Rumsfeld, who ordered and authorized torture and war crimes. Not doing so would suggest an unacceptable double standard."
A recently declassified report by the US Senate Armed Services Committee noted that the "U.S. government backing for the CIA's harsh interrogation methods set the tone for abuses by U.S. troops towards detainees" in Iraq and elsewhere.
The abuse and torture at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo weren't simply the work of "a few bad apples" in the U.S. military ranks. Instead, the techniques used in the abuse of prisoners have been approved and encouraged by the top officials in the George Bush's Administration.
Of course, some will say that the crimes committed in Darfur are not the same as the ones committed by the Bush Administration and thus cannot be compared.
True. I am not comparing the crimes, but only asking that all alleged war criminals be prosecuted and punished if found guilty, whether they are from Khartoum, Belgrade, Gaza, Tel Aviv, Washington DC, or Texas.
--------------
Savo Heleta is the author of "Not My Turn to Die: Memoirs of a Broken Childhood in Bosnia" (March 2008, AMACOM Books, New York). He holds an M.Phil degree in Conflict Transformation and Management from Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University in Port Elizabeth, South Africa. Visit www.savoheleta.com for more info.


Comments: 16
The law is not hard to understand on torture either in American federal law or international law.
I do not think Bush and his gang should be tried in American courts because America does not have a justice system that would be fair and impartial and Obama would only pardon the criminals anyway. I think they should be tried under the Geneva convention in another country where justice can be served.
These crimes are nor restricted to America but have taken place worldwide by Bush and his gang.
Its to Bad FDR did not have the chimps great grandfather tried for war crimes when he supported Hitler's war machine and death camps because this deranged loony would never have been born.
You could probably rationalize war crimes or torture against any sitting President, or world leader for that matter, that was involved in any conflict.
Bottom line, we're never going to know all the truth here anyway. Most of it will remain classified until our grandchildren can form an opinion.
I guess I have no sympathy for those terrorists anyway; Bush is gone, new policies in place, I'm moving on.... so should President Obama in my mind.
I happen to agree with the premise of this article, and I think the pressure to investigate and where appropriate prosecute should continue. But, the last thing I want to see is an announcement that any specific individual or group is under investigation. I hope that if crimes can be proven, indictments will be announced, and we should be demanding investigations.
In the court of public opinion the previous administration has already been tried and convicted. But here is the rub. If someone knows that an investigation is directed at his wrongdoing, evidence vanishes, sometimes suspects vanish, and in any case prosecution is made far more difficult. Ask the hunters of WW II Nazi war criminals. SOME of that cutthroat gang is still eluding capture and prosecution.
If not, then why opening the can of worms in Iraq, the Balkans, Rwanda, Sudan? Should we just let the criminals go free?
Is it a co-inky-dink that he might be captured by Obama-Joe Biden?
I don't know the effects of sublimination on the people...
But feel that the blinds fall over the eyes of the sheeple...
A war on Drugs...
A War on Terror...
A Stance against peace
A tryranny of Fear...
How ever we see it..
They will make it disappear...
He may have once been black...
Now he wants Bush's darkness clear.
We can't trust our leaders unless we re loud with the disputed...
Every evil s.o.b. that commits a crime in office should be prosecuted...
Maybe Bush and his cronies get away...
But someday...
In hell they all pay!
All I have to say...word
The president did not say he wanted to prevent prosecution. What he said was that he wanted to look forward, not back. It's not that he doesn't want to see criminals punished. It's that he doesn't want to be the lead on such an effort and niether should he be. This is the job of the Judicial branch, not the executive.
Many white collar criminals do not believe that they are doing anything "wrong" when they are committing their actions. I'm sure Kenneth Skilling (Enron) and Martha Stewart still think the only thing they did wrong was to get caught. We know that the previous administration does not believe that it was wrong and is not repentant for its actions.
The groundswell of revulsion should build in the American soul. It is already there in the international community. Recognizing that is not acceding to the rest of the world: it is acknowledging basic moral principles.
//We know that the previous administration does not believe that it was wrong and is not repentant for its actions. // That's because they applied the Nixon Rule: "If the President does it, it's not illegal".
I agree that it's the height of hypocracy to demand that foreign leaders stand trial for "crimes against humanity" and then refuse to hold our own leaders accountable for their actions.
Find the evidence. Try them. Punish those found guilty. End of story.